Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Blew the irf510's up, substituted irfp260's in there place...
#ubitx-help
Well, pushing the limits on the irf510 mosfets, they caved on me. So, digging through my junk I found four irfp260's and soldered them in as an effort to get back on the air. So far, it seems to work, but I noticed the current draw is much lower and a bit more heat is created, however, I have pretty get distance on wspr and about the same reports on ft8.
Does anyone know if there are any changes that should be made to the ubitx to get it to work better (with more output) using these mosfets? The obvious answer is to order some more irf510's from jameco and put them in, and quit limping the radio along on these other mosfets...but..ya know, spare parts bin and all. -- ---------- N5WLF, Greggory (or my nickname, Ghericoan) General Class, Digital Radio Hobbyist |
These HEXFETS are rated for 200V and 50A. They will (sorta) work as you have shown.
But the gate input capacitance is 4000+ pF. That increases your standing wave in the drive circuit and lowers your output considerably. You have 2 choices: Either replace the finals with IRF510s (after you have figured out what blew them up), or figure out how to lower the input capacitance to 180 pF. or so. You can also probably safely use a drain voltage of 48v or so, but there would probably be oscillation which would have to be accounted for. Incidentally, how do you know they are not oscillating now? Since the potential drain amperage is so high, it is probably wise to provide a current limiter if you have not already done so, especially using wspr or another more or less continuous wave function. It's better to replace the finals. john AD5YE |
It seems that just blindly replacing blown IRF510 devices with more IRF510's is an exercise in treating the symptom instead of fixing the problem.? There are many ideas and myths about why the IRF510 devices sometimes fail but only limited definitive information on what actually causes these failures.? We have empirical information indicating that if the SWR is high they will fail, but limited information on exactly why that is the case and what the mechanism of failure really is. These URLs may help, or may not: Arv? K7HKL _._ On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:59 PM, John Backo <jabac@...> wrote: These HEXFETS are rated for 200V and 50A. They will (sorta) work as you have shown. |
I keep seeing that many people seem to be having problems with the IRF510's in their uBITX radios, but that hasn't been my experience here at all. I have 3 uBITX's, one from each of the first 3 batches. ?Of all 3 kits, only the one from the third batch has given me any grief and that was due to the WX branded audio chip. ?Fortunately I had some UTC branded ones on hand and since replacing it have had no problems whatever. I have always operated my uBITX radios into antennas that had less than a 2:1 SWR but I wasn't particularly careful except that I always had an antenna of some sort or a dummy load connected to them when I first powered them up just in case they started transmitting due to a shorted key line or some other problem. ?I did not change the factory settings for PA Bias or the power controls, I just left them where they were set from the factory's final test. Either I was just lucky, or maybe that due diligence (antenna or dummy load connected before powering up) has kept me from having problems with the PA transistors. ?I am getting 10 or more watts out of each of the radios on 80-20 meters and about 7 watts on 10 meters with all three radios which falls in line with statements on the HF Signals web page about the uBITX. ? OH yes, the first thing I did on all three kits was use thermal insulators and insulated bushings to mount the IRF510's to their heat sinks. ?This way if something grounded contacts one or both heat sinks it doesn't blow the transistor. ? Just my 2 cents on the subject.? Jim Sheldon, W0EB?
------ Original Message ------
From: "Arv Evans" <arvid.evans@...>
Sent: 3/16/2018 11:09:57 AM
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Blew the irf510's up, substituted irfp260's in there place... #ubitx-help
|
Greg:
If you are aware of what happened, just get new deices and install them. You probably will need to redo the alignment as IRF510s are notoriously variable. You CAN let the adjustments alone, but you will never be sure of their real value. If you have ever changed them from the factory settings, you must re-do the adjustments. The simplest way is to set RV1, RV2, and RV3 to zero, using a DVM and RF probe. Then, install the new devices. Then check what the RCVR current draw is with the DVM. It should be somewhere around 100 ma. But it doesn't matter much what it is as long as RCV is working. Check the antenna SWR to make sure it is ok (below 2.0:1) Connect the PA drain voltage -- there should be little or no change in current draw. Make sure the antenna is connected. While in transmit, SLOWLY increase RV2 until there is an additional current draw of about 100 ma. SLOWLY increase RV3 until there is an additional current draw of 100 ma. The RX draw should be about the same; the idle TX draw is an additional 200 ma. or so. Then, in TX, speak into the mike with a long "aaahh" while SLOWLY increasing RV1. The current drain should increase another ampere or so. That should be close to your final adjustment. You can tweek RV1 a bit until actual distortion occurs; if that happens back off RV1 a hair until things are clear. (having a QSO to check your audio helps a lot). And there you are. You can check the voltage (carefully!) on the gates in TX. They both should be around 3v, and should match fairly well if the devices you installed were from the same place and time of manufacture. After that, let well enough alone. Incidentally, the same procedure applies for almost any MOSFETS installed as PA finals. Hope this helps. john AD5YE |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss