Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
Any info about making air variable capacitors, and magnetic loops?
I have some plans and ideas, but thought I should consult with the smartest group of people I know. Can I use zinc plated hardware with aluminum roof flashing? How to attach a arduino stepper motor to caps rotor shaft? Cheat on the loop by covering a hula hoop with aluminum foil? And I still need a antenna tuner after tuning the cap for resonance, Right?
Have any mag loop calculators, or instruction sites. Hopefully I will find more than I've seen so far. ?Good instructional homebrew videos on youtube are great too Thanks in advance de KG5KYJ |
M Garza
When I built my 10M loop, I used this calculator: I liked this calculator, since it provides approximate voltages the cap will see and I could play with the figures to see the outcome. Depending on the rf power, you could see several thousand volts at the cap.? They also have a capacitor calculator, you could use that to design a cap. You could use coax capacitors, high voltage caps, air variables, trombone style, or vacuum variables, just to name a few.? Search you tube, there are a ton of examples. I am feeding the loop with a toroid and 3 turns of #12 wire.? Similar to VK6CS in these videos: To connect a motor to the cap, use some kind of insulated shaft coupler to keep the high voltage off the motor.? Make sure to bypass the motor terminals with a 0.1uf cap to try and keep the rf out of the motor.? I would suggest a geared motor, ?something with a low RPM.? You could vary the voltage to the motor, to control tuning speed. Hope that helped some. Marco - KG5PRT? On Jun 21, 2017 1:17 AM, "John Smith via Groups.Io" <johnlinux77=[email protected]> wrote: I have some plans and ideas, but thought I should consult with the smartest group of people I know. Can I use zinc plated hardware with aluminum roof flashing? How to attach a arduino stepper motor to caps rotor shaft? Cheat on the loop by covering a hula hoop with aluminum foil? And I still need a antenna tuner after tuning the cap for resonance, Right? |
M Garza
I forgot to mention: I do not need a tuner, the antenna matches perfectly, 1:1.? The variable cap is the tuner.? I get about 200 kHz bandwidth before I have to retune. You would not want to use aluminum and galvanized metal.? You need to bond the metals, ie. solder or weld.? I do not know of a way to do that with those two metals.? The connection needs to have the lowest resistance possible or it could greatly impact efficiency. You could try copper or silver tape and brass bolts.? Maybe copper flashing. 73s Marco - KG5PRT? On Jun 21, 2017 2:09 AM, "M Garza" <mgarza896@...> wrote:
|
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI have never heard an outside signal on my bit40.? Testing with a signal generator I get signals down to or below 10uV? I have no antenna, but a wire out the door brings in nothing but a little more noise. To make others happy, I could hide the loop when not experimenting.? No one I know nowadays knows what a Ham is!
I am gathering parts for a loop.? I got 8 3/4" 45 Degree "El".? I am going to get 2 10' sticks of the thinner 3/4" copper pipe. If I cut to 8 pieces, there will be 2 1/2 ft. per section.? So the loop should be 6 ft or so. I found an online store an got the copper fitting a lot cheaper
than the Home Depots around here.? About 1$ a fitting. There is an L and M designation.?? For the drive loop, the
hardware stores sell rolls of 1/4" copper tubing. I have seen people put big wire or coax in Hula Hoops. But not Tin Foil?? To maintain High Q, you might need less resistance? If I have any results that warrant the expense, I will buy a vacuum variable.? But the $3 AM radio variable is used everywhere and in a lot of low power Ham projects. Mike, WA6ISP On 6/21/2017 12:08 AM, M Garza wrote:
|
M Garza
Here are a couple of pdf articles that might help. Marco - KG5PRT? On Jun 21, 2017 8:34 AM, "Michael Hagen" <motdog@...> wrote:
40m-high-power-mag-loop-tuner-iss-1-3.pdf
40m-high-power-mag-loop-tuner-iss-1-3.pdf
The-Underestimated-Magnetic-Loop-HF-Antenna-version-1.1.pdf
The-Underestimated-Magnetic-Loop-HF-Antenna-version-1.1.pdf
|
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThanks! That calculator like my 2 10' sticks of 3/4'' copper pipe.? Only
a little copper wasted to get the Cap in there. I have most the fittings.? I read you can put the control wires inside!? Sure why not? I have seen designs with the Cap on top and bottom? It is my understanding that under the matching loop top or bottom is where you could actually connect ground together if you want. If the most RF is at the Cap,? should it be at the top, farthest from earth ground? I have seen both ways, for now I guess CAP at top?
Mike, WA6ISP On 6/21/2017 6:59 AM, M Garza wrote:
|
I have seen both ways too, but at least one youtuber showed that with the feed loop at the bottom and the tuner cap at the top, the radiated pattern goes up and out mostly at 45 degree angle.
I am loving att this info. Next question is how do I know how much capacitance I need for the tuning cap? I would like a 40 meter band mag loop. but the calculators indicate 40 is impractical, and will suffer too much inefficiency. Much worse than my dipole.? And must the homemade butterfly cap be made with brass rods and nuts? Or will standard hardware do the trick without a significant problem? |
M Garza
If the efficiency is too low, increase the diameter of the loop or the diameter of the conductor. I am using a 7' square and a 30pf variable cap for 10M.? It is made of 3/4" copper. The calculator link I provided has a check in it, it will tell you if the loop is too big or small for the frequency you are working with. Keep experimenting! Marco - KG5PRT On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:54 AM, John Smith via Groups.Io <johnlinux77@...> wrote: I have seen both ways too, but at least one youtuber showed that with the feed loop at the bottom and the tuner cap at the top, the radiated pattern goes up and out mostly at 45 degree angle. |
M Garza
The cap would be best made of something you can solder or weld.? Same as the actual loop. If you use bare sheet metal and non galvanized bolts and nuts, you could solder it. If you build it, let us know. 73s Marco - KG5PRT On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:11 PM, M Garza <mgarza896@...> wrote:
|
I like the calculator, i've seen it before but lost it and have been using a software version by KI6GD. I have it bookmarked now, thanks.
What I am seeing is a 40M band loop with 90+% efficiency, needs 30 feet of 2" copper tubing. I currently have RG8X coax on a VHF ground plane antenna which gives me about 30% loss. It's a different system than BITX'ers and HF ops use, but comparatively speaking, if a mag loop has that much loss on 40, I wouldn't bother making it. I am really getting the impression that mag loops are better suited for 20 and above. Does anyone concur? |
Simon Thompson
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThe size of loop required above 20 m for any kind of transmission efficiency makes their use highly inefficient. I think they are neat antennas, and interesting in many ways, and I have made and used them myself, but I think of them, literally, as a last resort. Almost anything is better than a mag-loop; I know some people have success making qsos with them, but operators also make qsos with dummy loads. Even a short wire and counterpoise attached to some coax and a balun will work much better than a tuned loop. I know there will be people who reflexively respond to this with their own tales of amazing results, but a larger, more efficient antenna will almost always outperform a smaller, less efficient antenna.
|
I think that was well said all the way around. What do you think of them as receive only antennas, both as a two antenna system, and just for receivers only? If anyone is wondering what I mean by two antenna system, think about the Beverage antenna as receive only, and something else for transmit. This comes to mind because of the loops directivity and high Q, aka, less noise and QRM reception. So, is it equally inefficient at reception??
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:24 pm, Simon Thompson wrote: The size of loop required above 20 m for any kind of transmission efficiency makes their use highly inefficient. I think they are neat antennas, and interesting in many ways, and I have made and used them myself, but I think of them, literally, as a last resort. Almost anything is better than a mag-loop; I know some people have success making qsos with them, but operators also make qsos with dummy loads. Even a short wire and counterpoise attached to some coax and a balun will work much better than a tuned loop. I know there will be people who reflexively respond to this with their own tales of amazing results, but a larger, more efficient antenna will almost always outperform a smaller, less efficient antenna. |
Michael Luft
4X1LM 2017-06-21 20:33 GMT+00:00 John Smith via Groups.Io <johnlinux77@...>: I think that was well said all the way around. What do you think of them as receive only antennas, both as a two antenna system, and just for receivers only? If anyone is wondering what I mean by two antenna system, think about the Beverage antenna as receive only, and something else for transmit. This comes to mind because of the loops directivity and high Q, aka, less noise and QRM reception. So, is it equally inefficient at reception?? |