¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

BITX in 2m band


 

Greetings to fellows BITX'ers.

The other day I was testing a VCO for the range of 144MHz with the
interest of making work the BITX in 2m. The VCO oscillates from 125
to 145MHz approximately with a air coil. I use 2N2222 transistors,
but I soon realized that the BFR90 worked quite better.

It is mounted using the "manhathan style", with a copper panel like
ground and "ugly" assembly.

Then, the PLL oscillator works perfectly without no modification to
this frequency, what doesn't stop surprising me. But, the stability
is poor due to the precarious assembly, however it is working
without problem.

The following step was to inject the 134MHz signal (I use a FI of
10MHz original) to the amplifier of the original VFO made of two
2N2222, the amplifier works and the circuit was able to transmit and
receive. However a output tank syntonized to 144MHz didn't exist in
this test, the signal was very weak.

Once installed a tank of 3 coils and an amplifier with a BFR90 I
succeeded in extracting the 144MHz signal, not without an adjustment
very critical and delicate. The BITX transmitted and received in 2m
USB!!

I could not have made more tests, neither place a front end
syntonized to 144MHz :-( . If the time permits me I follow
investigating, because the topic seems very promising.

I ham working in a multiband/multimode design
(80m/40m/20m/15m/10m/6m/2m) (AM/FM/SSB/CW). The idea is to carry out
three PCBs: SSB GENERATOR; PA, LPF, BPF; Microcontroller, PLL and
VCOs. The work possibly is never concluded for time problems, but at
least it could remain like contribution to whom he or she cheer up
to finish it. I put these schematics in the files section as soon I
can.

I like to ear coments to this developement.
Greetings
EA7ARX, ex EB7HPM/EC7ALV


Paolo Cravero as2594
 

Hi
Great to read about your BITX developments!

I have one concern, though: will it be possibile to efficiently filter out unwanted harmonics +-n*10MHz at 144 MHz?

I think VHF&up transceivers use higher modulation IF or a different generation method.

Just my thoughts,
Paolo IK1ZYW

--
| QRPp-I #707 + www.paolocravero.tk + I QRP #476 |
| SpamAssassin-based email antispam/antivirus solutions |
\ Italian/English-to/from-Croatian translations /
\ Skype: pcravero /


 

--- In BITX20@..., Paolo Cravero as2594 <pcravero@a...>
wrote:
Hi
Great to read about your BITX developments!

I have one concern, though: will it be possibile to efficiently
filter
out unwanted harmonics +-n*10MHz at 144 MHz?

I think VHF&up transceivers use higher modulation IF or a
different
generation method.
Good... good question. ;-)
The Yaesu FT-290R have 4 passaband filters sintonized at 144MHz with
the aid of varicaps as output of mixer (it has also a ring diodes
mixer), it has a 11MHz FI, then I suposse this is not problem,
having some narrow passaband filters (four etapes minimun). The
consecuence of this is that the sintonization range will be narrow
also, but this is not a problem. I want to use only at 144.300 +-
50KHz. ;-) I do not use varicaps for sintonizing..

I make a tranverter for 28MHz to 144MHz a year ago and it also have
a 4 coil passaband filter little trickly to adjust. But no much
problem afterthat.

Howhever I not have made yet the tests. The 4 coil passaband filter
must be enclosed in a box, and the coupling must be soft. A coil
near the other coil assures soft coupling. It woks, as work for my
transverter a year ago.

Thank You for your coments.
Greetings
Manuel
EA7ARX


Just my thoughts,
Paolo IK1ZYW

--
| QRPp-I #707 + www.paolocravero.tk + I QRP #476 |
| SpamAssassin-based email antispam/antivirus solutions |
&#92; Italian/English-to/from-Croatian translations /
&#92; Skype: pcravero /


ajparent1
 

Hello,

Harmonics resulting from mixer operation are not a problem if
circuits are run linear with attention to correct signal levels.
Attention to filtering is a requirement and at 2M leads must be
short and use of shielding can be helpful.

I have a old and still very good Icom IC245 (nearly 30 years old)
2M CW/SSB/FM that the IF is 10.7mhz for SSB and CW.

However if the builder can use a 16 or 20mhz IF that is helpful.
It is possible to build a good SSB filter at 20mhz.


Allison
KB1GMX

--- In BITX20@..., Paolo Cravero as2594 <pcravero@a...> wrote:
Hi
Great to read about your BITX developments!

I have one concern, though: will it be possibile to efficiently filter
out unwanted harmonics +-n*10MHz at 144 MHz?

I think VHF&up transceivers use higher modulation IF or a different
generation method.

Just my thoughts,
Paolo IK1ZYW

--
| QRPp-I #707 + www.paolocravero.tk + I QRP #476 |
| SpamAssassin-based email antispam/antivirus solutions |
&#92; Italian/English-to/from-Croatian translations /
&#92; Skype: pcravero /


ajparent1
 

Hello,

I have also done transverter for 2M in the past as well as 2m
RX designs.

A good filter for 2m can be done with 3 coils of helix design
using aperture (window) coupling. Constuction is a 3 cell box
using 2 sided copper clad board material.

I have also found it convenient to develope for VHF/UHF using
modular construction. For BITx this would be the audio,
modulator, carrier osilarot and IF stages on one board and
encased then later stages in boxed. Connections between boxes
is with coaxial cable for RF. The whole radio becomes a box
of boxes. This appears difficult but allows good shielding
and makes stage by stage testing easier.

Good luck with 2M.

FYI: I have tested early stages of the BITx for 6M without power
amplifers. With only 1mW (.001w) the range was only a few miles
but the signals sounded good at the other end and recieve performance
is as expected. More work is to build the power amplifier chain
and enclose it.

Allison
KB1GMX [FN42hh]

--- In BITX20@..., "eb7hpm" <msraya@t...> wrote:
--- In BITX20@..., Paolo Cravero as2594 <pcravero@a...>
wrote:
Hi
Great to read about your BITX developments!

I have one concern, though: will it be possibile to efficiently
filter
out unwanted harmonics +-n*10MHz at 144 MHz?

I think VHF&up transceivers use higher modulation IF or a
different
generation method.
Good... good question. ;-)
The Yaesu FT-290R have 4 passaband filters sintonized at 144MHz with
the aid of varicaps as output of mixer (it has also a ring diodes
mixer), it has a 11MHz FI, then I suposse this is not problem,
having some narrow passaband filters (four etapes minimun). The
consecuence of this is that the sintonization range will be narrow
also, but this is not a problem. I want to use only at 144.300 +-
50KHz. ;-) I do not use varicaps for sintonizing..

I make a tranverter for 28MHz to 144MHz a year ago and it also have
a 4 coil passaband filter little trickly to adjust. But no much
problem afterthat.

Howhever I not have made yet the tests. The 4 coil passaband filter
must be enclosed in a box, and the coupling must be soft. A coil
near the other coil assures soft coupling. It woks, as work for my
transverter a year ago.

Thank You for your coments.
Greetings
Manuel
EA7ARX


Just my thoughts,
Paolo IK1ZYW

--
| QRPp-I #707 + www.paolocravero.tk + I QRP #476 |
| SpamAssassin-based email antispam/antivirus solutions |
&#92; Italian/English-to/from-Croatian translations /
&#92; Skype: pcravero /