Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
need help for IRF540
kumar gautam
HI,
HERE IN?MARKET IRF510 IS NOT AVAILABLE, ONLY IRF540 IS AVAILABLE. ANY ONE HELP ME THAT IRF540 IS EQUIVALENT OF IRF510 OR I CAN SUBSTITUTE THIS FET.
WITH 73'S
DE KUMAR GAUTAM
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your friends n family photos for FREE with Yahoo! Photos. http://in.photos.yahoo.com |
Heinz Schnait
Hi Kumar,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The datasheets give the following parameters: IRF510: RDS = 0.54 Ohms; ID(continous) = 5.6 A; maxPower = 43W; Input capacitance = 180 pF IRF540: RDS = 0.077 Ohms; ID(continous) = 28A; max Power = 150W; Input capacitance = 1700 pF The IRF540 is a more robust version than the IRF510. It looks to me as if the 540 has more junctions wired internally in parallel. This is also reflected in the input capacitance, which is much higher for the 540. I am afraid this might cause problems for the gate driving circuit, especially at higher frequencies. Is anybody out there with a working IRF510 amp who would like to do some experiments with a IRF540 replacement? Please share your results! 73 Heinz, OE5EEP Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2005 07:33 schrieb kumar gautam: HI, |
ajparent1
Hello,
That IRF540 will be very difficult to drive with increasing frequency. The input will be very reactive and will require a more complex network to get the needed RF power (and voltage) impressed across that gate capacitance. That takes greater power and the driver may not be up to the task. A first order calculation says driving impedence will be 1/10th (.1) times that of the IRF510. None of the input or output networks used will perfom as well with the irf540 due to it's differences. At 80m this will not be as bad as 20 or 10m. I'd try it but do not be surprized if the results require redesign to achive adaquate gain. If you are successful you may be rewarded with greater power than the IRF510. A scratch evaluation suggests if accomodated the IRF540 could be capable of 60-80w output with about 4-5W drive at the lower HF frequencies aassuming it's not bandwidth limited. There are several parameters to look at besides those quoted. Gate turn on voltage (lower the better). Output capacitance as well as Drain to Gate capacitance are also functional parameters of importance. The drain to gate capacitance is can be thought of as a negative feedback capacitor from Drain to gate and limits gain with increasing frquency. The result is that you need to feed both the gate and extract power from the drain at low impedences or the implied feedback will reduce gain to below zero (less out that in). At 20m these will look like around 7 and 2 ohms for the IRF540 where the IRF510 they are around 65 and 10-12 ohms. Accomodating these new conditions were not anticipated in the original design. I hope this gives a starting point to a successful design. Allison --- In BITX20@..., Heinz Schnait <oe5eep@q...> wrote: Hi Kumar,as if the 540 has more junctions wired internally in parallel. This is also540. I am afraid this might cause problems for the gate driving circuit,especially at higher frequencies.some experiments with a IRF540 replacement? Please share your results!SUBSTITUTE THIS FET. WITH 73'S |
Rahul Srivastava
Hi!
?
Go ahead with 540. Let me know someone coming this side 510 is available at Lucknow.
?
73
?
Rahul VU3WJM
?
kumar gautam wrote:
NEW - crystal clear PC to PC |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss