Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
level and wave shape after balans mixer?
Hi,
I build some parts of the transceiver and tested every part individualy. The LF parts works fine (a pitty the schematic is not corrected with the voltage/output of the lm386). If I add a sinus LF wave to the microphone terminal, the shape looks simular on the colector. However, as soon as I connect the coil of the balans mixer to it, it becomes a-symetrical (one side is going to be clipped). If I put a lot of LF signal in it (looks heavily distorted, then I get a maximum output(after the attenuater) of about 0.2 mw. (in 50 ohm). After reducing the LF signal to a point it looks normal, the output power is very very less.... Did anyone look at the osciloscoop the way I did? Anyone measured the output? The distortion I can imagine can be caused by one of the diodes, but such low output at that moment? After the next amp (before the x-tal filter, the maximum output is about 1 mw (in 50 ohm). The reason is that I measure in 50 ohm is that the load is in the mw. meter. Thanks in advance for your comments, Chris PA3CRX |
Ashhar Farhan
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, vdberghak wrote:
The LF parts works fine (a pitty the schematic is not corrected withthe correct schmatics are now at www.phonestack.com/farhan. i have run out of bandwidth on . ther is no way i can access those files now. just before i ran out of bandwidth, i did manage to put a redirect on the home page. yo probably have te BITX20 page directly bookmarked. which is why you are not being redirected to the new site. If I add a sinus LF wave to theyou need a 10mV signal at the base of the mic. this is usually too low to be measured with an oscilloscope. your best bet is to actually connect a mic and speak into it. if you can whistle (keeping your breath away from the mic), it is a single tone-test. an extended 'aaaa' looks like a three-tone test to me. the other side is clipeed, because you note, the diodes in the mixer will clamp the output through the attentuator. this is an expected behaviour. If I put a lot of LF signal in it (looks heavily distorted, then Iit is best to check the balanced modulator on its own first, without the mic connected. you should be able to null the carrier at mid setting of the preset and the 22pf trimmer. if that works, then you can move to the audio stage. typically, keeping the audio output of the mic amp connected to diode modulator, you should see similar waveforms at the modulator input (where the two transformer windings are shorted) and the output (the attentuator pad) when using the oscilloscope at audio frequencies (keeping the time base to about 10mSec per div). as you have pointed out, the distortion is due to the non-linear nature of the diodes. To measure the RF component alone, you should measure the output through a hihg pass filter. for quick and dirty measurement, connecte an RFC across the output of the attenuator and then connected the oscilloscope. if you have already made the crystal fitler, it is best that you measure and check the signal at the output Q12 (without the RF mixer connected). there is little that can go wrong in the Q12 and Q11. the only caveat is that depending upon the exact frequency of the BFO, you might or might not get SSB. If you are sitting in the middle of the filter's passband, you will get DSB with audio roll-off at 1-2khz. but the enveolope will be there to see. have you tested the receiver yet? it is usually the recevier that comes alive first. it gives you a good idea of how things are working. i am convinced that we need to add detailed test measurements for the transceiver on the site. i have most of them in my log book. i will post them soon. - farhan The distortion I can imagine can be caused by one of the diodes, but |
Thanks for the additional information.
the correct schmatics are now at www.phonestack.com/farhan.I checked again and found out that point 5 and 6 are stil wrong (not in accordance with the data sheet, as noticed and posted by someone else). I connected it correctly but an other person that follows the schematic can have serious problems. (if you make adjustments to your site, may be you can also add a link to this yahoo group?). The point is that I expected more output after the mixer. I am always suspicious with that kind of coils (did I take the right one, did I make the correct connections, is it really working the way it should be) so I like to check something. if you have already made the crystal filter, it is best that youmeasure and check the signal at the output Q12 (without the RF mixerconnected). I will work on it today and add directly the next stages to terminate the filter as good as possible. I hope the output will then be incresed some more otherwise I do not end up with enough power at the end (or am I pessimistic ;-) ). have you tested the receiver yet? it is usually the recevier thatcomes alive first.The receiver works, while connecting a wire to Q3 I hear a lot more then with the wire connected to the mixer. i am convinced that we need to add detailed test measurements forthe transceiver on the site. i have most of them in my log book. iwill post them soon.In general, voltages can be checked easily to find out roughly that the connections are correct and the correct values resistors are mounted. Some general clues about what can be expected while connecting a wire to a point or what voltage can be measured with simple test gear would make it more complete indeed. May be current with and without oscilator on (for every stage) will avoid the need for more test equipment? Adding too many measurement possibilities may be prevents a lot of people building the design because they think it is all needed. Doing the way you do now makes it important for everyone to understand the circuit resulting in a higher level of radio amateurs ;-) Other builders comments? Best regards, Chris, PA3CRX |
Mark
- farhan wrote:
i am convinced that we need to add detailed test measurements for the transceiver on the site. i have most of them in my log book. i will post them soon. I would welcome test measurements - two days of head scratching so far! The RX is alive in my rig but not yet kicking! I have a lot of BFO audible in the output also I have had to bypass the xtal filter and the band pass filter to get any signal strength. I'll tell you all this story just for fun. I had no joy with the band pass filter and nearly threw the rig out of the window. Then I realised that when I had "made" 2.2 pm out of 5 x 10pf caps I had them in parralel and not series! Oh boy, the basic mistakes! I try some more tomorrow. Mark G0MGX --- In BITX20@..., "vdberghak" <vdberghak@z...> wrote: Thanks for the additional information.foundthe correct schmatics are now at www.phonestack.com/farhan.I checked again and out that point 5 and 6 are stil wrong (not in accordance with theone, did I make the correct connections, is it really working the wayit should be) so I like to check something.thatif you have already made the crystal filter, it is best that youmeasureand check the signal at the output Q12 (without the RF mixerconnected). comesmorealive first.The receiver works, while connecting a wire to Q3 I hear a lot then with the wire connected to the mixer.fori am convinced that we need to add detailed test measurements thethattransceiver on the site. i have most of them in my log book. iwill postthem soon.In general, voltages can be checked easily to find out roughly the connections are correct and the correct values resistors arecurrent with and without oscilator on (for every stage) will avoid theneed for more test equipment? |
开云体育Hi All
?
I rather agree with Mark - I have done a lot
of construction in the past and the absence of such info takes a long time of
searching for a fault.? AND It will make great testing and fault finding
practice for my club members whilst I am building the project.
?
the question is how best to show it
...
?
I suggest a second schematic so that the
first is used during construction and then the second during testing.? At
the point where? a value wants to be put annotate with an arrow and letter
and then list the information separately ..
?
Mark if you give me the info then I would
happily try to do a suitable sheet and post it to the group fro
discussion
?
Regards
Charles
?
? -----Original Message----- - farhan wrote:From: Mark [mailto:Mark@...] Sent: 01 July 2004 12:19 To: BITX20@... Subject: [BITX20] Re: level and wave shape after balans mixer? i am convinced that we need to add detailed test measurements for the transceiver on the site. i have most of them in my log book. i will post them soon. I would welcome test measurements - two days of head scratching so far! The RX is alive in my rig but not yet kicking! I have a lot of BFO audible in the output also I have had to bypass the xtal filter and the band pass filter to get any signal strength. I'll tell you all this story just for fun. I had no joy with the band pass filter and nearly threw the rig out of the window. Then I realised that when I had "made" 2.2 pm out of 5 x 10pf caps I had them in parralel and not series! Oh boy, the basic mistakes! I try some more tomorrow. Mark G0MGX --- In BITX20@..., "vdberghak" wrote: > Thanks for the additional information. > > > the correct schmatics are now at www.phonestack.com/farhan. > I checked again and found > out that point 5 and 6 are stil wrong (not in accordance with the > data sheet, as noticed and posted by someone else). > I connected it correctly but an other person that follows the > schematic can have serious problems. > (if you make adjustments to your site, may be you can also add a > link to this yahoo group?). > > The point is that I expected more output after the mixer. I am > always suspicious with that kind of coils (did I take the right one, > did I make the correct connections, is it really working the way it > should be) so I like to check something. > > > if you have already made the crystal filter, it is best that you > measure > > and check the signal at the output Q12 (without the RF mixer > connected). > I will work on it today and add directly the next stages to > terminate the filter as good as possible. I hope the output will > then be incresed some more otherwise I do not end up with enough > power at the end (or am I pessimistic ;-)? ). > > > have you tested the receiver? yet? it is usually the recevier that > comes > > alive first. > The receiver works, while connecting a wire to Q3 I hear a lot more > then with the wire connected to the mixer. > > > i am convinced that we need to add detailed test measurements for > the > > transceiver on the site. i have most of them in my log book. i > will post > > them soon. > > In general, voltages can be checked easily to find out roughly that > the connections are correct and the correct values resistors are > mounted. Some general clues about what can be expected while > connecting a wire to a point or what voltage can be measured with > simple test gear would make it more complete indeed. May be current > with and without oscilator on (for every stage) will avoid the need > for more test equipment? > Adding too many measurement possibilities may be prevents a lot of > people building the design because they think it is all needed. > Doing the way you do now makes it important for everyone to > understand the circuit resulting in a higher level of radio > amateurs ;-) > > Other builders comments? > Best regards, > Chris, PA3CRX |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss