Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
2.8 Mhz parasitic signal on 15 and 20m
#ubitx
When I use SSB on 20, 18 and 15m, I get a strong signal (20db below the main signal) 2.8Mhz left and right of the tx frequency, as if the carrier is being amplitude modulated with 2.8 Mhz.
I already tried disabling the PA power and measuring the signal at different points before the PA, but this signal isn't there, not even directly at the power MOSFETs. When I enable the PA, I can't measure low power signals on the PCB anymore. On all other bands, this singnal isn't present. In CW mode, the signal isn't there on any band. Has anyone observed something similar? I'm completely at a loss. Spectrum analyzer screenshots will follow as soon as I get everything set up again. |
Which version of ubitx do you use? On Sat 22 Jun, 2019, 12:34 PM , <fr.beckenbauer@...> wrote: When I use SSB on 20, 18 and 15m, I get a strong signal (20db below the main signal) 2.8Mhz left and right of the tx frequency, as if the carrier is being amplitude modulated with 2.8 Mhz. |
Questions!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
1: Which uBitx model is this ? 2: Is the carrier to spur frequency difference constant in separation or does it increase and decrease as you tune ? Raj At 22/06/2019, you wrote:
When I use SSB on 20, 18 and 15m, I get a strong signal (20db below the main signal) 2.8Mhz left and right of the tx frequency, as if the carrier is being amplitude modulated with 2.8 Mhz. |
Haha, Raj, He hasnt read our emails? On Sun 23 Jun, 2019, 9:59 AM , <fr.beckenbauer@...> wrote: the difference is constant, both when tuning and when changing band |
Very strange issue. Final may be oscillating ?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
At 23-06-19, you wrote: Haha, Raj, He hasnt read our emails? |
Please edit and leave in parts of the message you are referring to in your reply. In my case
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
when I dont see trailing message content I dont bother to read or reply as I cant be bothered to figure it out who anyone is talking to. Your problem is interesting, please show us a spectrum of it. I have not encountered any such fixed spacing spurs, they always move closer and farther from carier as I tune. Raj At 23-06-19, you wrote:
any tips on how to test or mitigate? I have access to a very well equipped HF lab tomorrow. |
Please edit and leave in parts of the message you are referring to in your reply. In my caseI'm not used to this mailing list stuff, I tried to treat it like reddit, sorry. Back to the topic: I feel so stupid. The Spurs *do* change when I tune. On 20m, the 3rd harmonic of the VFO (59 MHz * 3 = 177 MHz) is mixed with the 4th harmonic of the 1st IF (45 MHz * 4 = 180 MHz), resulting in spurs 3 MHz (180 - 177 = 3) left and right of the signal when I tune to 14.0 MHz. When I tune to 14.05 MHz, the spurs are 2.85 MHz from the carrier, when I tune to 14.10 MHz they are 2.7 MHz away, and so on. On 15m, the 2nd harmonic of the VFO (66 MHz *2 = 132 MHz) is mixed with the 3rd harmonic of the 1st IF (45 MHz * 3 = 135 MHz), resulting in spurs 3 MHz (135 - 132 = 3) left and right of the signal when I tune to 21.0 MHz. When I tune to 21.05 Mhz, the spurs are 2.90 MHz from the carrier, when I tune to 21.1 MHz they're at 2.80 MHz, and so on.? These mixing products are generated in the final mixer. This also explains why the products aren't there in CW mode, since the IF isn't used at all in CW mode, and the frequency is directly generated by the VFO. Maybe add a note to the block diagram, currently it says the VFO tunes from 45-75 MHz, which only is the case in SSB mode. I modded the PA to RD16HHF1s following DF3FY's instructions, checked the output afterwards, but except for the known harmonics issues it was clean. I replaced the LPF relays with name brand parts to fix that, checked the harmonics afterwards (now at -45dB, nice), and this weird signal still wasn't there. Then I took everything apart to put the bitx into a metal case, and this signal appeared, now I can't get it to go away. The problem is that I don't remember if I tested everything using SSB mode with a 1khz signal from my computer (tune button in WSJT-X is convenient for this, also for finding the sweet spot for NF gain and so on), or if I got lazy at some point and used CW mode, or at which stage I used which. I don't know how the unmodified design prevents these signals from getting strong enough to matter, do the IRF510s just not have enough gain at these high frequencies? BPFs at the output would completely remove them, of course. On 15m the signal was weak enough to be within legal limits (around -45dB), but still very noticeable. On 10m, I saw some spurs at similar distance to the carrier, but they were at like -60dB, so nothing to worry about at all. DD2TH |
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýDD2TH If you found the DF3FY reworked PA through ubitx.net there is also the following which apply to Version 3 &4. A higher B/W flatter response PA will amplify what ever is on it's input, both in band and out that much better. There were many threads prior to the release of the V5 revision around October last year, perhaps search this forum for the posts Understanding Spurious Emissions si5351a CLK drive levels in uBITX #ubitx Spurs for Dummies? #ubitx-help or made by Alison, KB1GMX Henning, DK5LV Warren, WA8TOD I don't hold a German licence, I would verify your countries requirements for spurious emissions is similar to?? FCC @ -43dBc spec as not all countries are. Alan On 29/06/2019 15:40, fr.beckenbauer@...
wrote:
Please edit and leave in parts of the message you are referring to in your reply. In my caseI'm not used to this mailing list stuff, I tried to treat it like reddit, sorry. |
The whole problem is that the final tx > BiDi amp picks up signal from the finals/relays and remixes
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
them with carrier and creates a mess. Your problem could come from a not properly grounded case or unshielded output wire to connector. Make sure no output RF wires come near the BiDi stage Q20/21/22 . At 29-06-19, you wrote:
I modded the PA to RD16HHF1s following DF3FY's instructions, checked the output afterwards, but except for the known harmonics issues it was clean. I replaced the LPF relays with name brand parts to fix that, checked the harmonics afterwards (now at -45dB, nice), and this weird signal still wasn't there. Then I took everything apart to put the bitx into a metal case, and this signal appeared, now I can't get it to go away. |
The legal requirement for in Germany is -40dB below carrier for the total power of all unwanted emissions added up. I've already done the L5, L7 mod, although I used w¨¹rth inductors we had in the lab instead. It helped the overall situation, with fewer spurs appearing, but these two characteristic spurs, which are generated in the way I calculated earlier, stay, since they are generated after the roofing filter. I'll try adding the v5 LPF after the 45Mhz preamp next. There looks to be enough space on the board for the mod to be simple. I don't know how I missed that option. I didn't think the spurs would be generated in the preamp, since when I reduced the drive by doubling R22, all that changed was the output power, the spurs stayed at the same level relative to the carrier. I'll report back tomorrow if the LPF helped. DD2TH, 73 On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 12:07 AM, Alan de G1FXB wrote:
|
jim
Just out of idle curiosity, do you have access to another 12 volt supply..apply separate power to ubitx and the FET finals Just to see.... Jim On Monday, July 1, 2019, 10:25:55 AM PDT, Thomas DD2TH <fr.beckenbauer@...> wrote: So, I just installed a LPF after the amplifier to the final mixer as exists on the v5 bitx, and it didn't change my spurs whatsoever. |
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 01:24 AM, jim wrote:
?I've been running off a lead acid battery to eliminate power supply noise for these tests |
That red wire touching that toroid could be picking up rf and coupling it to the toroid and generating the spurii On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 9:54 AM Thomas DD2TH <fr.beckenbauer@...> wrote: On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 01:24 AM, jim wrote: |
Some thoughts... If the 2.8 MHz spurious is rough sounding and drifts a bit then it could be some sort of parasitic oscillation.? If it is stable and a pure note then it is probably related to internal or external mixing between VFO, BFO, or external stable frequency sources.? If the 2.8 frequency changes with tuning then the rigs VFO is somehow involved, but it may be multiples of the VFO that is mixing with something else to arrive at that frequency.? Scope probing of mixer inputs and outputs might show if a mixer is balanced or unbalanced. Mixer imbalance usually results from one side of the transformer having a bad connection or a defective diode in one side.? Improper biasing of an amplifier stage could be causing it to act as a mixer.? DC voltage levels could isolate such a situation.? An open or wrong value RF bypass capacitor can also lead to increased mixing products from a supposedly linear amplifier stage.? Arv? K7HKL _._ On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 3:04 AM Lawrence Galea <9h1avlaw@...> wrote:
|