Has anybody managed to integrate the modified gdyulfdin/ft8_lib with sBit or zBitx firmware?

WZab - SP5DAA All Messages By This Member #117659 The modified ft8_lib available at , and it offers a better handling of nonstandard callsigns . However, I wasn't able to simply use it as a replacement of the original ft8_lib sources in the or firmwares. It looks like certain non-trivial integration work is needed. Unfortunately, I won't be able to take a look at that before the half of July. Has somebody else succeeded to replace the original ft8_lib in [s/z]Bitx with that improved version? ? 73, Wojtek SP5DAA
Shawn Rutledge K7IHZ / LB2JK All Messages By This Member #117662 开云体育 Yes, that’s one thing I’ve been doing in my fork: I also have a fork of ft8_lib, and my sbitx fork has it as a submodule. ?So I would suggest cloning the sbitx repo into a different directory first, then?git submodule update --recursive —init, then make. toggle quoted message Show quoted text On Apr 23, 2025, at 22:32, WZab - SP5DAA via groups.io <wzab01@...> wrote: The modified ft8_lib available at , and it offers a better handling of nonstandard callsigns . However, I wasn't able to simply use it as a replacement of the original ft8_lib sources in the or firmwares. It looks like certain non-trivial integration work is needed. Unfortunately, I won't be able to take a look at that before the half of July. Has somebody else succeeded to replace the original ft8_lib in [s/z]Bitx with that improved version? ? 73, Wojtek SP5DAA

开云体育