开云体育

Put the spaces[] array definition outside of any function, near the top of the file with the other data definitions, somewhere around line 230. Jack, W8TEE To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday,

I figured that if there were 10000 steps over 5v, and I had a 20mv drop at the wiper, that would equate to 40 steps, so I figured 50 was a good starting point

I'm looking at the uBitx schematic at the bottom of this webpage. If there's something more recent, I haven't heard about it. Jerry

Hi Allard It's at 9950 right now, hopefully I'll get a chance to play around some more later today. I have insalled the fine tune button, and it is a huge help!

which circuit are you looking at? - f jgaffke@...> wrote:

Jack, well poop, that'd didn't compile. Scary thing is I think i understand what you did! I put the #define statements up with the rest of them. tried the code in setup, then in the loop I get this

Greg, The one in the QEX article is obsolete. I have found, and bought, a number of modules on Ebay. Most recently I picked up 3 equipment pulls from the same guy for $6.00 apiece. Any module the puts

Those output low-pass transmit filters are 50 ohms and symetrical. You could just borrow a filter design from some other rig that's suitable for 50 Watts of power. Should be one filter per ham band as

Source code (complete project) for the sample code I posted yesterday may be found here: https://github.com/pilant/N1VQW-HomeSprinkler It is functional and works (I have already built two

Also, adding the Spot/Fine Tune button lets you tune in 1 Hz steps. Even when covering a 300 KHz span, the Fine Tune button makes it easy to tune the BITX.

Zero is probably a good value for now: ? ??/g/BITX20/message/24738 ( /g/BITX20/message/24738 ) You don't want to just copy that uBitx schematic and expect it to

Great! By how much did you have to reduce the value? Was 9999 ok, or did you need to go lower? 73 Allard PE1NWL

I am planning on building a uBITX and as I was going through the schematic I noticed that C241 & C245 are labeled 0. is there a proper value for them? Art KB8HGW

What GPS engine did you use?? Where can I get one for $6.95?? ?The GPS device listed in the QEX article costs a lot more.? Definitely interested in duplicating this.?? Thanks Greg KD4VV

It works! Thanks. Now I just have to determine the optimum value. I guess that is what I get for getting a good deal on ebay. I'm gradually learning how the code works. 73 Brent

Hi Brent, an alternative way to fix your problem is perhaps the following change. Normally, when the pot is at its upper limit, the 'knob' value should read 10000. Fast tuning will normally start when

Thanks a lot! Looks really interesting.

Hi I think you made a mistake in labeling the filter at the input of the receiver section. It is a BPF not an LPF Regards Lawrernce

Would changing the value in line 1943 to something less than 10000 help?

Hi again Allard I tried making those changes, no luck. Changing the values does extend the tuning range, depending on what value I put in (eg? I can get the radio to tune to 7105 instead of 7100),