¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Re: Nano Capability with 2.8" TFT Displays
I updated my blog with a link to my existing sketch utilizing the TFT display. As I am not interested in CW, I have left as much as possible with out any changes. When I get some other projects
By DuWayne Schmidlkofer · #47887 ·
Re: ND6T AGC implementation for uBIT-X
I'd appreciate 2 each of the kits. Thanks for doing this. Aloha, Steve WH6ST
By Steve · #47886 ·
Re: Calibration - my approach #ubitx
Dave, We¡¯re almost there. What are you listening for? A null? A peak? When I tried this before it was not obvious what I was supposed to be listening for¡­ Thanks again John Sent: Tuesday, May 1,
By John Lauber <jlauber@...> · #47885 ·
Re: Calibration - my approach #ubitx
In the "Set the BFO menu", you can directly modify the BFO frequency while listening to the audio output of the radio.? So, you have real-time feedback. You can not however tune the radio as it's in
By David Beal · #47884 ·
Re: Calibration - my approach #ubitx
John should also have asked here is - what do you mean by "tweak BFO setting" - what does that mean and how is it accomplished in the 'Set the BFO' menu?
By PeteWK8S <pmeier@...> · #47883 ·
Re: Nano Capability with 2.8" TFT Displays
Yes, but I doubt that a touch screen is going to work with a Nano plus all of the other tasks it's responsible for in the ?BITX environment. The Protoneer might work because of its increased memory
By Jack Purdum <jjpurdum@...> · #47882 ·
Re: Nano Capability with 2.8" TFT Displays
Hello So is it possible take VFO data to have a external 5 or 7 inch then?? Best Regards, Stein-Roar Brobakken post@... LB3RE K3RAG Skype: lb3re.rag
By LB3RE/LC0X "Rag" Stein-Roar · #47881 ·
Re: Nano Capability with 2.8" TFT Displays
I've experimented with both 5" and 7" displays, but not with a Nano. I've done 3.5" and 3.9" with a Mega 2560. None of those are with a touch screen. However, the two larger displays are are touch
By Jack Purdum <jjpurdum@...> · #47880 ·
Re: ND6T AGC implementation for uBIT-X
Hi, Please add me to the list 1 of each boards (smt) Thanks... Zbigniew L
By Zbigniew L <zlipecki@...> · #47879 ·
Re: ND6T AGC implementation for uBIT-X
Forgot to say, I would like the thru-hole kits, not the SMT kits - Rich Spohn WB2GXM
By Richard Spohn · #47877 ·
Re: ND6T AGC implementation for uBIT-X
Kees, I would like to order one each of the AGC kit and the Pop filter kit. I was waiting to see if you will have a "formal" url/store at which to order the kits. As you direct, will send my info and
By Richard Spohn · #47876 ·
Re: Arduino Projects...
I finally purchased mine and am waiting for free time--
By walt hodges · #47874 ·
Re: ND6T AGC implementation for uBIT-X
Please add my name to that list. John Greusel KC9OJV
By John KC9OJV · #47873 ·
Re: ND6T AGC implementation for uBIT-X
I will certainly purchase a ready made PCB for this design.? I did ND6T's small PCB as he described, and wasn't happy with the result.? My work not his.? I did purchase a small lot of 2N7002 SMDs;
By AA7GW Gary · #47872 ·
Re: VK2AUJ's ?BITX project
That math may look silly. We found that the silicon was just a couple degrees C hotter than the tab. But the math becomes important on something like the IRF510. Many Bitx40's are getting around 20
By Jerry Gaffke · #47871 ·
Re: Nano Capability with 2.8" TFT Displays
Hello Have anyone tried with 5 inch touch display also??? Best Regards, Stein-Roar Brobakken post@... LB3RE K3RAG Skype: lb3re.rag
By LB3RE/LC0X "Rag" Stein-Roar · #47870 ·
Re: ND6T AGC implementation for uBIT-X
Please put me down for two of each. Thanks,? Loren KA5U
By lsgroff@... · #47869 ·
Re: Nano Capability with 2.8" TFT Displays
Yes, Mike, that's a very nice implementation and others have done even more, such as using the Teensy 3.6 and will be presenting the details at FDIM this year..... but I was wondering what could be
By Kees T · #47868 ·
Re: ND6T AGC implementation for uBIT-X
Please put me down for 2 each. Appreciate all the hard work and willingness to share with us all. Thanks, Gene N2IJF ________________________________ Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 9:53 PM To:
By Gene Nitschke <genenitschke@...> · #47867 ·
Re: Calibration - my approach #ubitx
Oh - and I was tuning by ear for lowest audio level on unwanted sideband (LSB) whilst also receiving the wanted USB.? -- Dave Beal AE6RQ
By David Beal · #47866 ·