Re: sBITX
Thanks a lot!
Reading the names of Farhan and Phil Karn makes me shiver! Wow!!
You are the ones!!!
Rafael
By
Rafael Diniz
·
#88936
·
|
Re: sBITX
I should add that it's a transceiver design, not just a receiver. The DSP
is done by a Raspberry Pi 4. The talk first presents a modification of the
uBITX, then goes on to show a new design that
By
Shirley Dulcey KE1L
·
#88935
·
|
Re: sBITX
The sBITX is a simple hybrid SDR; it uses a conversion to 27 MHz, a crystal
filter there, and then downconversion to a near-zero IF where the signal
goes into an audio ADC.
Here's a link to Farhan's
By
Shirley Dulcey KE1L
·
#88934
·
|
Re: sBITX
Hi everybody,
I'm sorry, but after many messages, I also wanna know what sBITX is.
This link does not give any clue. Any link with the actual video of
Farhan speech?
Thanks,
Rafael
By
Rafael Diniz
·
#88933
·
|
Re: sBITX
See /g/BITX20/topic/82011726
By
Jerry Gaffke
·
#88932
·
|
Re: sBITX
I guess I have not been following as closely as I should. But what is this sBITX? When I joined this group it was for the BITX 20, 40 or the uBITX.
THANKS, AL
KB4RA
By
allen west
·
#88931
·
|
Re: sBITX
I would like to get the boards for constructing a sBITX, too.
-Paul? K9MV
By
Paul k9mv
·
#88930
·
|
Re: uSDX
A Pico Pi is a big step up in capability from the current ATMEGA328.
IMHO the uSDX is more of an exploration of what can be done that any sort of product like the uBITX or QCX. Guido, PE1NNZ,
By
Bob Benedict, KD8CGH
·
#88929
·
|
Re: uSDX
Hi there,
I'll buy a PCB Board, $5.00 plus whatever shipping will be..
Let me know, Paypal OK
73 Ron? W4RWU
By
R. Urbaytis
·
#88928
·
|
Re: uSDX
I thought hard about current consumption. "We are no longer in Kansas". The
modern LiPo battery with 3400 mA hours is cheap. At 14.4 volt battery will
run sbitx for 5 hours. You can switch off the
By
Ashhar Farhan
·
#88927
·
|
Re: uSDX
So,
Here are the figures :
1. Raspberry Pi4, with 4.3 inch waveshare screen (800 x 480 pixels, veru
readable, like a smartphone), running sbitx = 540 mA. With wsjtx, 650 mA.
2. Rpi 4, with 7 inch
By
Ashhar Farhan
·
#88926
·
|
Re: uSDX
Mornin' Ken:
Yep, and I get that if you're hiking 10 miles up a vertical cliff to a place where you have to carry in your own antenna mast to get the EFHW off the ground. That's their "thing" and
By
Jack, W8TEE <jjpurdum@...>
·
#88925
·
|
Re: uSDX
Jack,
You should go spend some time on the FT-817/818 mail list - they obsess down to the smallest detail for saving power, to the point where it is considered "wasteful" to use a particular antenna
By
Ken N2VIP
·
#88924
·
|
Re: uSDX
I get the "green" emphasis, but part of me wonders "why" when it comes to a transceiver. Yes, I do understand SOTA, POTA, IOTA, and the other OTA's and I indeed hope to be a part of that this summer,
By
Jack, W8TEE <jjpurdum@...>
·
#88923
·
|
Re: uSDX
The capabilities and included functions of an RPi PICO are so drastically reduced compared to an RPi 3 or 4 that there is almost no comparison. That said, for its original design, an RPi at the heart
By
Ken N2VIP
·
#88922
·
|
Re: uSDX
There is an effort to port the code to a Pico Pi which has dual cores and much better capabilities, but is still a controller and much less power hungry than other Pi
By
Bob Benedict, KD8CGH
·
#88921
·
|
Re: uSDX
Raspberry Pi power consumption figures:
https://www.raspberrypi.org/documentation/hardware/raspberrypi/power/README.md
RPi 4 consumes about 600 ma, or about 3 watts at 5 volts
Raspberry Pi Official
By
Ken N2VIP
·
#88920
·
|
Re: Hot Pot!
Hello Richard,
You are correct in the assumption that it is not needed for the Nextion display implementation, nor anything else on the ?BITX.
I would check that you have not connected the power
By
Evan Hand
·
#88919
·
|
Re: Cheap Chinese Linear LPF
Arv,
Thanks so much for the links.
I've been improving my vacuum plumbing and have been able to into the high single digit micron range. May try electrically heating and evaporating titanium wire to
By
Tom, wb6b
·
#88918
·
|
Re: uSDX
I too would be interested in actual performance data, most importantly the efficiency data.? Efficient portable SSB operation was the original goal of the ?SDX, gaining the Class E power efficiency
By
Evan Hand
·
#88917
·
|