Re: Attachment bloat!
Considering some of the men I've worked with over the years, it's understandable you come across as a bit gruff at times. Puts them off balance before they can suggest you aren't going to be part of
By
Jerry Gaffke
·
#98163
·
|
Re: Attachment bloat!
Or I can just do snark and leave. -- Allison ------------------ Please use the forum, offline and private will go to bit bucket.
By
ajparent1/kb1gmx
·
#98162
·
|
Re: Attachment bloat!
Cuz she's peevish.? ;-) But when it comes to RF design, tends to know more than the rest of us put together. So we mostly put up with it. Jerry, KE7ER
By
Jerry Gaffke
·
#98161
·
|
Re: Attachment bloat!
Mark, Not at all. Its just traffic, and it was? the original complaint too much traffic and larger stuff was harder to take... Well, why did you reply to something long dead?? FIrst the assumption
By
ajparent1/kb1gmx
·
#98160
·
|
Re: Attachment bloat!
Is it wrong to reply to older threads now? I was looking at the group's space and attachments and saw this post about attachment size.? One option for sure is no email, but I think the OP needed to
By
Mark - N7EKU <n7eku@...>
·
#98159
·
|
Re: Linear amplifiers for UBITX6 and other QRP transceivers...
...in push-pull amps. This isn't likely to be a good option for, for example, the MRF101 amp. Thankfully there two LPF options for that project.
By
AndyH
·
#98158
·
|
Re: Attachment bloat!
This string was moribund since june and suddenly its a thing? FYI I chose the most aggressive stance, no email at all. I use the web and I get to see it all.... even that the message before this is
By
ajparent1/kb1gmx
·
#98157
·
|
Re: What's New? NANO every
If using flash, put what has been EEPROM data into RAM, make any changes there for current operating mode. Have an explicit "SAVE" command to store from RAM to flash, establishing how it boots up.
By
Jerry Gaffke
·
#98156
·
|
Re: Attachment bloat!
Hi Hylton, Each user may control their own email/attachment preferences.? Just click the "Subscription" link on the left menu, then click on the drop-down arrow for "Advanced Preferences".? In this
By
Mark - N7EKU <n7eku@...>
·
#98155
·
|
Re: sBitx #sBitx PA MOD Plan
#sBitx
Mark, Generally space is not the issue, though its just being courteous. I've seen way too many fuzzy and other marginally useful pictures.? That prompted my comment. Allison ------------------
By
ajparent1/kb1gmx
·
#98154
·
|
Re: sBitx #sBitx PA MOD Plan
#sBitx
And a side note, JPEG has excellent compression methods; a file compressed at a quality level of 60 will still look excellent but will save 3-4x the space and download faster. 73,? Mark
By
Mark - N7EKU <n7eku@...>
·
#98153
·
|
Re: What's New? NANO every
Size as the mega is only the older uno size board... Price is not the issue usually as people are hanging expensive displays and what not. For a lot of stuff the Nano EVery was a solver for me as it
By
ajparent1/kb1gmx
·
#98152
·
|
Re: What's New? NANO every
Allison, I had wondered that too. Must be one or more of price/size/heat/power issue? 73 Mark AJ6CU
By
Mark Hatch
·
#98151
·
|
Re: sBitx #sBitx PA MOD Plan
#sBitx
I will combine two comments. Since the mod manual will be likely electronic, the size of the images relative to the page is not as important as resolution.? ?That makes it easy to bring up the page
By
ajparent1/kb1gmx
·
#98150
·
|
Re: What's New? NANO every
What's interesting is the Arduino mega was passed over completely. With more IO and 250K of flash,more ram and EEprom yet for work that otherwise fits the 8bit realm it was passed. Not knocking the
By
ajparent1/kb1gmx
·
#98149
·
|
Re: sBitx #sBitx PA MOD Plan
#sBitx
In the final MOD doc would you please make the photos full page. John
By
John
·
#98148
·
|
Re: What's New? NANO every
Dean will give the encoder software a try in the Pico version. Will let you know how it works. I get why Dr Lee pushed so much functionality off onto the Nextion. He was trying to squeeze as much as
By
Mark Hatch
·
#98147
·
|
Re: Arduino Nano RP2040 Connect
Addendum¡ This one has been tested in a v6 and it fits (best not to include the lcd socket).
By
Mark Hatch
·
#98146
·
|
Re: Arduino Nano RP2040 Connect
Yes, the software and voltage are the real issues. You might also worry about the pull-up voltage on the i2c bus. I have actually designed a Raduino board that could take nano,nano every, nano IoT,
By
Mark Hatch
·
#98145
·
|
Re: Arduino Nano RP2040 Connect
Looking at the pinout diagrams, I don't see any conflicts there. But watch out for the voltage; the Nano is usually operated at 5V, while the RP2040 is a 3V3 chip and its inputs are not 5V tolerant.
By
Shirley Dulcey KE1L
·
#98144
·
|