开云体育

Arv: An if (DEBUG statement block will not cause scaffolding code to be excluded from a compile. I think what you mean is something like: #define

Dennis, thanks for the sketch to use the encoder. In the library, RotoryEncoder, I found a bit of info on these 100ppr encoders available from Matthias, the Arthur. It is very interesting how he took

Jerry I strongly agree with you. Code organization and functions that contain blocking code are important and a PITA. At present I am working on code for some test equipment (Arduino based) which

Jim, Sorry that I miss represented the original Raduino adapter. I definitely want one of those to put in one of my v4 uBITX. ?I will go back to the site and order one. Thank you for the

OOPS sorry Evan, The pre V6 stuff has run out of stock and not available right now, but has not been discontinued. Major problem is with the Si5351a VFO/Clock chip. I have around 100 on hand and now

Excuse me Evan! That adapter board used the Teensy 4.0 (smaller MPU unit) and it has NOT been discontinued. Don't post things you know nothing about please. Jim, W0EB

Arv, Here is a link to a company that produces the hardware and software to replace the v6 Raduino with one that is designed for the Teensy 4.1. http://www.w0eb.com/ They sold an adapter board for

I had that wrong. PARIS is 50 "dot elements", the spaces between the dots count as separate dot elements. So 20wpm is a rising or falling edge every 1/16.66 = 60 milliseconds, not 30. With properly

Jerry: The key to a solution is the last sentence: The feature set of the ?BITX has outgrown the processor and it's time to leave the ATMega328 behind. While I have my own preferences, I think we

Part of the CW problem is that there are already many uBITX out there in use which could use an upgrade. This involves replacing the whole Raduino if we want to upgrade to a larger processor.

Absolutely right, the Nano is overloaded, and i2c writes to a display slow it down further. However, sending CW is reasonably slow, even for a Nano clocked at 16mhz. Lets assume we are shooting for

I haven't gotten around to powering up my V6 yet, but I think my solution will likely work the best:? rework the Nano's program to remove the keyer portion, then use a Hamcrafters K44 external

Hi, I went back to using an external keyer just because of the clumsy operation of the built-in keyer in my V3. The uBitX then sees straight key operation regardless of what is outside the radio or

If we were all the same, would it not be a VERY?dull world?

Jerry KF6VB, What is your WPM setting when doing the tests?? Does the error rate change with the WPM speed setting? The reason I am asking is to see if it is related to the increased load on the

Because with you doing all the real trail-blazing development for us Farhan, the rest of us have far more time to devote to the more trivial aspects of life, including spell-checking, calculation

Yes, using various voltage levels into an ADC was done because of no remaining pins on the Nano. Best to choose a processor with enough pins for the job such as the RPi-Pico that Farhan has been

I am not a "CW Op"...barely able to walk and talk sometimes. 8-) I must admit that using voltage based switching via an ADC would not be my first choice for generating CW. The ADC in an AVR328 has

Hi Arv, It's the factory uBITXv6 software. Slightly modified as to tuning rate, but nothing that would affect CW. Apparently, the paddle input is an *analog* one. Three possible voltages are

Which software are we talking about? Is this an RF interference problem, or possibly a race condition in software? Arv _-_