开云体育

I should correct that - you can set DTR high in WSJTX but I haven't had as much luck with that.? I think it times out during the Arduino reset - but it still works fine after using HRD.? I am

I probably should defer to Shirley. But instead I'll just say "yes, it would work", except that the pins are soldered to the wrong side of the board for plugging into the Raduino. You want a board

That's the authentic official Arduino Nano. It will certainly work. But clones from China are much cheaper, if you care. wrote:

Curious. The reason I gave the "better" link is because the original link didn't work for me. I refreshed to my "better" link and it seemed to work.? But now it doesn't. I assume it has to do with

Would this one work?? According to their site, it's the 'classic' version: https://store.arduino.cc/usa/arduino-nano Again, I am so clueless about Arduino products but am learning through this group.

I’m glad I asked about the Nano before I placed an order. Thanks to all for the input and comments. Scot WB7AVU Sent: Sunday, January 3, 2021 4:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] Ideas

Thanks for that Jerry.? I usually remove the extra stuff from URLs before sharing/posting but Mouser seems to want it there.? The link as shown doesn't work for me. Will - AF7EC

Shirley and Jerry, thanks so much for educating me.? I'm enjoying the discussions here and learning more every day! :-) Will B - AF7EC

Ah, you are correct. I did a quick read of the datasheet for the Nano Every and saw mention of an ARM processor, but it is not what our code runs on. Seemed weird that they could get the Nano module

The issue with resonators and such is that they tend to wander. This can sometimes on a few radios put a birdie right in the middle of an IF passband. The uBitx IF got moved from 12 to 11mhz because

TL:DR version: don't buy a Nano Every to use in your Raduino right now unless you are prepared to do some software development. The ATMega 4809 is not an ARM processor. It's still an 8 bit AVR. It

Not having to insulate the RD's tab from ground is definitely a win. Are you saying the RD is significantly more efficient? Do you have numbers? Or perhaps this is your way of pointing out that heat

Reliable operation of an asynchronous serial link does not require a highly accurate clock; it only needs to be within 1% or so. That's easily met by a ceramic resonator. The CH340C is probably not

Hmm,? that's a genuine "Arduino Nano Every". Has anyone tried that on a Raduino yet? I think it could be made to work, but may require some changes to the source code. This might be a better web

There are the new Nano Every and Nano 33 from Arduino. Those are different, and are not 100% compatible with the earlier Nano. You don't want either of those unless you are prepared to make changes to

That's a Nano Every. Not suitable as a direct replacement. It uses a different microcontroller and requires some code changes. wrote:

Seems for continuous digital operation the RD might be preferred just for the fact that you can bolt it's tab directly to an aluminum radio's case,, giving a very large heat sink, add to that , the RD

In HRD? - make sure you check the DTR box. That will reset the Arduino in the uBitx and it should connect and communicate ok. Other programs (WSJTX, and FLDIGI) don't expose this setting.? I find

Greetings! This is my first post to this group, and I'm more of a Raspberry Pi guy myself, so please be gentle. :-) Would this work as a replacement?

Banggood claims their Nano Clones to be "improved", though I doubt this matters to us. Banggood gives this rather cryptic comment regarding the CH340 USB chip that is used: #################### Chip: