开云体育

I do not suggest it is for net operation. It is suggested as a preferred frequency per band for testing the radios and having QSOs with other users to verify operation of the radio/s. And not

As I remember the discussion and attempts, it was for 7.277 MHz at 3:00 PM "local" time.? Just the fact that the time zone was not specified made for lots of calls and no answers. It was also noted

The Sunday night net was fairly popular for a while.? I don't remember who started it or promoted it but I do remember it took constant reminding on this list to keep up participation.? Much like

Is there one for the uBITX radios...???

I agree. People should quit hassling W8TEE

For ARRL QRP Frequencies see https://www.arrl.org/files/file/conop.pdf Bob WB8BEL

Given the tone of his comments included with "inappropriate" flag, it's very clear that the flagger has some kind of personal animus towards W8TEE. For this reason, the flagger's action is itself

Thank you Curt.

Thomas I used a microphone with a similar connector. I was able to ID the pinout, so I cut the cord and carefully matched wire color to the pins, and soldered to a new connector matching my ubitx

To limit it to a Sunday at a particular time is not a way to attract others. An announced frequency on ARRL, qrz.com and qth.com is a way to get people's attention. If you make it too specific to our

I have to agree, it’s certainly on topic and can’t wait to buy a copy. Chris

This looks like an interesting book. Do you have a list of the projects in the book? I’m interested in putting together a TNC and other digital projects. Chris

I am enthusiastic about V6 and also had a V4 in times past. But I did say "uBITX" without any hint about a version. I believe the concept is a good one: Asimple and affordable transceiver that is what

How has that Sunday evening 7.277 net been going for the rest of you? I have listened & called many times and heard nothing except the net meeting on 7.275 MHz. I vote for using one of the ESTABLISHED

Keeping in mind this is not a ?BITX exclusive list, but based around all of Farhan's BITX variations, several years ago we had a reasonable go at a Sunday evening 40m net on 7.277 in the US. --

Yes, why not? Having our own frequencies would promote OUR radios. It would also encourage some of our users to use the frequencies while they may not want to just go QRPm and talk to Trixies. This is

Simply connecting the radio to a dummy load with a single cable (not going through switches, etc.) may isolate the possibility of it being or not a common-mode problem. Just an idea... Bob — KK5R

Why not use the ALREADY ESTABLISHED QRP frequencies?

This is now just an idea. While there are established frequencies for QRP radios, why don't we have frequencies on 80/40 and 20Meters for our users of the uBITX radios? They could be frequencies where

fantastic! i have read the very early proofs, this book is going to get a number of people off youtube and onto arduino ide! - f [email protected]> wrote: