开云体育

Sorry Owen, Missed your reply. I put the inductors in a convenient place without obliterating the component legends. The seller on eBay had mentioned that they were Murata, the size may be 1210,

I'd like to second this question about the required inductors. Is it that the SMD inductors have a lower Q, or is it the smaller physical size, or the change in position, or a combination of all these

Interesting link by this Italian guy, surely not a macaroni one hihi, he also says to add a capacitor across (?) the coil.

Regarding Filters and axicom realy towards band switching? , i saw an useful link. ?http://www.i1wqrlinkradio.com/antype/ch97/chiave50.htm Perhaps it helps. regards sarma ?vu3zmv

I had an old Panasonic DS2E relay. Here are top and side exploded photos. Sorry for lack of clarity The contacts can be seen mounted on either side of the relay. The armature moves sideways pulling

Turn off 2-Step Verification * Open your Google Account. * In the "Sign in & security" section, select 2-Step Verification. You might need to sign in. * Select Turn off. * A pop-up window will appear

Has anyone tried changing the attenuator from 6db to a 3db one? 73 NIck VK4PP

Mike AI4NS What is this "2-factor authentication with Google" that you mentioned? I just looked at your member profile on the BITX20 site and see nothing like that on Groups.io. You are set for All

I was using 2 factor authentication with Google. It is still set for my groups.io account, and I need to get it turned off. How do I contact a group admin or someone that can help fix my account? Mike

There were a bunch of spurs coming out of that first mixer into the 30mhz LPF on transmit that were below 30mhz. One in particular (first flagged by Allison) was at? (45mhz - Carrier), so

OK, 3 more plots.? Mouser just delivered. The first one is with 680uH and the second is with 1mH. That's about 8dB better at 25MHz and below when compared to a plain uBITX "16 pin" relay. The third

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 01:05 PM, Henning Weddig wrote: Did You make a measurement on the mirror reception which should be attenuated by the input lpf? Or is it another stone to be lifted? A low pass

Thanks Jim that helps. I may have been a bit optimistic about the test lead situation here.73 Scott

Wavelength band Frequencies Emission types authorized Standards see § 97.307(f) , paragraph: LF: 2200 m Entire band RTTY, data (3). 2200 m Entire band Phone, image (1), (2). MF: 160 m Entire band

?[grin] except the ORIGINAL digital mode: CW cheers gordon ________________________________ Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 4:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] digital mode BITX QSO

Digital modes not allowed on 7277. FCC 97.305 Mike K5ESS Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 1:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [BITX20] digital mode BITX QSO Afternoon/Evening, Sunday, October, 14

YEP !? Misstyped.... ------------------------------- --

Allison, concerning the "stuff" coming out of the first mixer passing through the input lpf and reaching Q90: this gives me the hint that the lpf does not problerly do what it should! Did You make a

Henning, If you use Q90 you only need maybe 13-15db with headroom. I'll make a comment.? BANDPASS the output of Q90, there is way too much stuff coming out that can even if it meets -43dbc down

I gave phone/SSB a go last sunday from Northern Virginia, no luck. I have much better luck with PSK31 or JT8.? Does any uBITXer want to try digital modes on 10/15?? If so, I'd vote for staying on