开云体育

Kees, Thank you for the reassurance. David A Posthuma, WD8PUO 1 (616) 283-7703 Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2018 1:51 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] uBitx Unfiltered David, Everyone's

Chris: I greatly appreciated your offer to 3-D print. I just didn’t want to put you through the trouble of having to order special materials you don’t normally carry. I’m sure I am not alone in

David, Everyone's opinion matters as we're "looking for a pony in the room". I appreciate your input and we'll get there with V3 and V4. 73 Kees K5BCQ

Jerry: If it did come down to requiring a version-5 ubitx, I would hope there would be some discount to those of us who purchased version 3 or 4 with the understanding that it was a 80-10 meter

Jerry, I was talking about an add-on filter board between T11 and K3 with all the existing onboard parts removed to populate the new plug-in filters or just disabled. Dual relay means a relay at each

Of course, the uBitx should be a clean and solid 80-10m 10W rig. Unfortunately, v3 and v4 don't quite do that, and would require extensive mods to achieve it. The high bands in particular are

*Way off topic.* The BITX20 group is not for politics.

Isn’t this like…their third CEO in as many years (or perhaps two years)? Barry Shelley didn’t last too long, did he? What’s going on over there in Newington anyway?! I mean, apart from

Kees & Team: I know my opinion may matter little since I am not an engineer but only a Ham for 44 years. I still have and use projects I built many decades ago. And when the sunspot cycle once again

Kee's Are you talking filters at the output of the rig, for use with current v3 and v4 boards? That's likely the best bet for getting current rigs compliant. Me, I'm ok with dropping the high bands,

Okay! Sounds good, will have a look. I’m afraid the stock firmware is unusable for serious CW transmissions. Thanks, Joop PG4I

Thanks Allison, I have now tried both the recent V4.3 from GitHub and KD8CEC’s version. Ian’s version works a bit better, attack time is improved but I am still missing part of the first dit to

Makes more sense in this thread............. Since most keep talking about the need for BPFs for certain bands, I "guess" the 80m-10m uBITX direction should be a board with 6 filter capability. How

Answer. The comment means- apparently someone is successful in the realm of electronics and ham radio. Another coincidental BITX success? It is simply newsworthy and I wish him well. Just like when

Sean, Its been several days since you posted likely its eben seens and everyone is going "I dunno". ? ?Not enough description of whats going on or not going on. ? ?Not sure of the mods done. ?

Jerry KE7ER, And you have half a radio....? That amp expect about 12-14dbm drive from the radio its attached to. That means for ubitx you still need about 32-34 db of gain hopefully not 3904s from

Dennis Yancey ???#58339?? They are marginal at best... save your Money and get a better tuner... What is marginal at best?? Does it have a name or ? Allison

Timothy, Have you ever looked at the board??? Fixing the driver moved the problem sage back to the predriver and first amp. Pulling bands at the time of its design was not considered as it was

If it is done cleanly it could look quite nice. Specifically small copper lugs can be soldered on the bottoms of the existing control relay pins to attach to braided core Cu wires which are then hot

They are marginal at best... save your Money and get a better tuner... -- 72 and God bless KD4EPG