开云体育

KE0KKM, SE Minnesota. About 30 miles East of Rochester. I'm in the process of moving so it's been a few weeks (and probably will be a few more) since I've been on the air. [email protected]> wrote:

Should be easy enough to make Pavel's library interface identical to that from Etherkit, perhaps just a wrapper around what Pavel already has.? Then each of us can decide which library to use when we

Tayda has good connectors, but I would not buy their pins if they look like their picture! Beware of the pins that look like this! You have to cut them flush on the sides where they slide in. I have

Once the Nano is -almost- full, you can spend 90% of your time fooling around trying to make another feature fit. Best to just go with one larger processor, if you add a second processor you then have

Did you try the CH340 driver installer software for these cheap chinese clones that use the cheaper USB interface chip? If you have only used expensive name brand ARDUINO products before, then you

As Pavel mentioned I have indeed tried his modified library a few days ago and the initial results were quite promising (except that tuning was not yet working on a standard raduino, but I trust that

Hello, I have two lambda/4 verticals, 10 meters apart. Each vertical have 30-40 buried radials. Basic description of similar system you can find here: http://www.eham.net/articles/19842 Yes, they have

Here are some on ebay: http://m.ebay.com/itm/10-sets-KF2510-2P-3P-4P-2-54mm-Pin-Header-Terminal-Housing-Connector-Kits-/221938959365?nav=WATCHING_ACTIVE Marco - KG5PRT

I was hoping to see more people here since we are the other two quarters of the country. I know it's a small sampling right now, but this is what I hear on BITX QSO Night. We midwesterners must be

Hello all, My BITX40 have following modifications: DDS (VFO+BFO) with QRP labs si5351, I2C display, RF RX attenuator 16dB, RF gain control, CW and AGC. Not so happy with AGC circuit (original with

You save 25% of the firmware and about 7% of sram, not much in deed, but every byte counts: see the data below. After the patch is applied (depending on Allard, it's his play) I will try to apply some

http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Molex/08-50-0113-Cut-Strip/?qs=sGAEpiMZZMs%252bGHln7q6pm3P%2fiRtn6jyg2vFu%2ft3OPPc%3d The pins vary is cost how they come packaged. These at Mouser seem to be the

Is that the same as these? (note: they use the same pic for all of them) http://www.taydaelectronics.com/connectors-sockets/wafer-housing-crimp-terminal/serie-2500-2-54mm.html Vince. -- Michigan VHF

Jack, That's for Allard's code. I created a Si5351 lib a while ago that it's smaller (firware & SRAM) than the Jason one (https://github.com/pavelmc/si5351mcu) and I was playing with Allard code and

Mouser Crimp Term 22-30 Ga. by Molex # 538-08-50-0114

Hi Raj. ?Thanks for the reply. ?I've already tried adjusting the bias pot with no change. ?If I wanted to check the final, how would I do that? ?Can it be fixed? ?Thanks!

I would like to obtain a few female pins for the connector bodies used with the bitx40. ?But I do not recognize these connectors. ?It would be useful to make up shielded cables for some of the

I have just uploaded a corrected version v.1.14.1 to Github at https://github.com/amunters/bitx40 ( https://github.com/amunters/bitx40 ) The only difference with the previous version 1.14 is that the

PTT connection straight onto the PTT as normal, and the mic element is an electret, have tried the supplied Bitx element and can tell no difference. am using a standard 8 pin plug/socket so may decide

OK...I misunderstood when you said "no clicks". The statement "...the RF noise is almost gone" makes more sense. I was wondering how you could?completely removed it in code. I have a battery voltage