开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
Date
Re: Yeah! No!
I received some parts in the mail tonight. A package of (25) T37-6 toroid cores and 32AWG wire. I wound up 45 turns on the coil, soldered it in, and it now seems to pass inspection according to the
By Kent Vanderploeg · #19451 ·
Re: A more stable Bitx40 (fun with ceramic resonators)
You'd have to pull it pretty far to get it into the US 40m phone band 12.000 - 4.915 = 7.085 MHz. ---In BITX20@..., <cruisenewsnet@...> wrote : Would this one work?
By Jerry Gaffke · #19450 ·
Re: BPF's
Awww...MEK ain't so bad. Smellzzz nizzzeee tooo... glurfle meep grp ding... huh? wazzat? RichKC8MWG
By Richard Andrew Knack · #19449 ·
Re: BPF's
Thanks Thomas. What about dipping the toroid in candle wax? 73 Ken BITX20@...> wrote:
By Ken · #19448 ·
Re: BPF's
MEK will rot your liver in short order without good ventilation. I like a fine drizzle of hot-melt glue, followed by judicious use of a hot air resolder nozzle to melt and spread the glue. Look for
By Thomas Noel <tnoel@...> · #19447 ·
Re: A more stable Bitx40 (fun with ceramic resonators)
Would this one work? CSTLS4M91G53-A0 Murata Electronics North America | Crystals, Oscillators, Resonators | DigiKey
By KC8WBK · #19446 ·
Re: A more stable Bitx40 (fun with ceramic resonators)
Looks like Mouser has a 4.8mhz Ceramic Resonator, which would put it at 7200khz. CSTLS4M80G53-B0 Murata Electronics | Mouser
By Ryan Flowers · #19445 ·
Re: BPF's
Clear coat is what I have handy. Wanted something quick and easy to use. 73 Ken VA3ABN [BITX20] <BITX20@...> wrote:
By Ken · #19444 ·
Re: BPF's
Why not use coil dope? The commercial stuff isn't cheap, but it's just polystyrene dissolved in MEK, so not hard to make. RichKC8MWG
By Richard Andrew Knack · #19443 ·
BPF's
I am building up my own external BPF's for 80/40/20. I need to coat the windings to hold them in place. Can I use a spray clear coat? Will it affect the inductance? 73 Ken VA3ABN
By Ken · #19442 ·
Re: A more stable Bitx40 (fun with ceramic resonators)
This is where i get mine, http://www.thepartsplace.k5nwa.com/index.php?route=product/category&path=68 Joel KB6QVI
By Joel Caulkins/N6ALT · #19441 ·
Re: A more stable Bitx40 (fun with ceramic resonators)
The usual suspects: Mouser, Digikey, Farnell, and Jameco. Todd K7TFC BITX20@...> wrote:
By Todd K7TFC · #19440 ·
Re: A more stable Bitx40 (fun with ceramic resonators)
What is a good source in the US for a ceramic resonator?
By KC8WBK · #19439 ·
Ashhar Farhan CNN Intervew (08-May-05, 20:00 UTC)
Hi Colleagues Please, can someone have available this interview? -Ashhar Farhan was interviewed for a CNN report (08-May-05, 20:00 UTC) on the Amateur Radio contribution to the Asian Tsunami
By co6bg@... · #19438 ·
Re: troubleshooting the bitx40 receiver
Microwave that tap washer alongside a glass of water. A microwave oven needs something to absorb all that energy. I once tried microwaving half the recommended amount of popcorn. The magnetron
By Jerry Gaffke · #19437 ·
Re: tuning step size for the SI5351 / Radunio version
VU2DEV was also trying as to use a carbon Pot with link below, a couple of weeks ago. http://hamrmipl.blogspot.in/p/ddsdirect-digital-synthesizer-using.html?m=1 Also got codes for 20 Meter for above
By Sandeep Lohia · #19436 ·
Re: tuning step size for the SI5351 / Radunio version
It could definitely be annoying if the tuning rate isn't set to your preferences. I used symbolic constants (e.g., #define INCREMENT) to set the increment and the time delay in the code before the
By Jack Purdum <econjack@...> · #19435 ·
Re: tuning step size for the SI5351 / Radunio version
Ha haa, that's true Todd :D Pardon, bit off topic ;) Jerry, I used kind of this
By Sandeep Lohia · #19434 ·
Re: tuning step size for the SI5351 / Radunio version
The encoder with variable increment step could be made to work well. On the other hand, I have a Tecsun consumer radio that does that and it annoys me no end how it more or less arbitrarily flips
By Jerry Gaffke · #19433 ·
Re: tuning step size for the SI5351 / Radunio version
Jerry: See my earlier post (19785Re: [BITX20] tuning step size) on the 26th about using the spin rate of the encoder?shaft to automatically change the increment step. Jack, W8TEE To:
By Jack Purdum <econjack@...> · #19431 ·