Re: troubleshooting the bitx40 receiver
Dear farahan have u uploaded bitx transmitter troubleshooting? kindly send me link
By
vijai george
·
#19366
·
|
Re: troubleshooting the bitx40 receiver
Kent,
I am pretty sure the speaker you see and hear is connected to the speaker connections on the board. The red wire Farhan is holding is not connected to anything and Farhan is just using it to
By
dvhammer_99
·
#19365
·
|
Re: Raduino code
Probably SI5351 library needs to be 1.1.2 (manage library, filter on SI5351 and select previous version and install. V2 is beta and uses different parameters for several functions).
Ron ¨C
By
ron van doremalen (PA3FAT)
·
#19364
·
|
Re: troubleshooting the bitx40 receiver
I think we're misunderstanding each other. The red wire connects to a
speaker. What does the other end of the speaker connect to? We can't see
the wiring in the video, so perhaps you're using the
By
Kent Vanderploeg
·
#19363
·
|
Re: troubleshooting the bitx40 receiver
it is not connected anywhere. it is hanging off the table
BITX20@...> wrote:
By
Ashhar Farhan
·
#19362
·
|
Re: Raduino code
the version 1.8 of arduino is complaining about const chars. can you fix
that as well? i will pull all of that together and test on the boards.
- f
BITX20@...> wrote:
By
Ashhar Farhan
·
#19361
·
|
Re: troubleshooting the bitx40 receiver
I second KF7RSF's comment. Can you please tell us what the red wire
/speaker connection is you are using? It's not clear on the video.
Kent
W9WB
By
Kent Vanderploeg
·
#19360
·
|
Re: Raduino code
Is the raduino included with the BITX pre-programmed?
By
kf8zn@...
·
#19359
·
|
Re: A more stable Bitx40 (fun with ceramic resonators)
Nice idea Peter!
Increase in value of C96 will give you a little more range. I will try adding a parallel MV209 to D9 to increase the tuning capacitance range. I have a bunch of them in the
By
Raj vu2zap
·
#19358
·
|
Re: Raduino code
I downloaded the repository and installed the Si5351 library. I discovered that the sketch does not compile with the latest version of the Si5351 library, version 2.
I've just submitted a pull
By
Matthew Robinson
·
#19357
·
|
Re: Raduino code
Clear & concise code, compiles fine with Arduino ver 1.6.6
Thank you Ashhar
Alf vk2yac
Ashhar Farhan farhanbox@... [BITX20] wrote:
The Raduino code is available on github
By
alf
·
#19356
·
|
A more stable Bitx40 (fun with ceramic resonators)
If you don't wish to add a DDS to the Bitx40 (eg need low current consumption) I now have an alternative.
A cheap as chips 4.92 MHz ceramic resonator can be substituted for L4 in the VFO and be
By
Peter Parker
·
#19355
·
|
Re: Raduino code
Got it to compile, though I needed to
download the Si5351 libraries using the following from
https://github.com/etherkit/Si5351Arduino :
Library Installation
By
John Sutter
·
#19354
·
|
Raduino code
The Raduino code is available on github now.
https://github.com/afarhan/bitx40
- f
By
Ashhar Farhan
·
#19353
·
|
Re: A few of questions.
and had great results on the last three projects. I'm using a Etherkit
board with a SMA RG-174 pigtail to connect to my BitX40 right now. In all
cases I have not noticed any cross talk, but I always
By
Todd K7TFC
·
#19352
·
|
Re: Replacing toroids
BITX20@...> wrote:
available, one can replace it with air coil.
Did Farhan used toroids? :D
http://www.phonestack.com/farhan/bitx.html
-----------+-----------
Mine is still
By
Sandeep Lohia
·
#19351
·
|
Re: A few of questions.
BITX20@...> wrote:
IRF510 bias, will require higher gain in the preceding stage.
Had both
replaced voltage controlled IRF with transistor 2SC ;)
& 2N3866 @ 24 Volt in preceding
By
Sandeep Lohia
·
#19350
·
|
Re: A few of questions.
Hi Todd,
I have soldered RG-174 directly to both the Adafruit and Etherkit boards and had great results on the last three projects. I'm using a Etherkit board with a SMA RG-174 pigtail to connect to
By
Joel Caulkins/N6ALT
·
#19349
·
|
Ordered mine...
Well, I got some money for Christmas so I decided to use some of that to order my BitX40. Looking forward to receiving it!
RichKC8MWG
By
Richard Andrew Knack
·
#19348
·
|
Re: A few of questions.
You're right, moving to class C is more than a matter of changing the IRF510 bias, will require higher gain in the preceding stage.
Another thing to look into if somebody wants efficiency is class
By
Jerry Gaffke
·
#19347
·
|