Re: Chirpy audio in ubitx6.1
#bfo
#ubitxv6
#v6
Hello Praba,
Two possible mods might help:
1 - Add a 10uF capacitor across C75.? If electrolytic, the + goes to pin 1. (see 9.2.2 in the datasheet)
2 - Add the bass boost circuit described in the TI
By
Evan Hand
·
#116290
·
|
Re: Trying to update firmware in ubitx6.1
#v6
Issue fixed...
what i did is just made hex file from arduino IDE after compiling and the upload said hex file via Xloader.
success.
By
Praba Karan
·
#116289
·
|
Re: reviving my sbitx v3
Makes sense. It does seem rather touchy and the effect on signal strength of the received signal is more like an on/off switch than a range, like you might expect. Anyway, it works and I am now
By
Michael Bales
·
#116288
·
|
Chirpy audio in ubitx6.1
#bfo
#ubitxv6
#v6
The attached is Rx audio of my ubitx v6.1. Audio is too chirpy and unpleasant to hear. But Tx audio is good as per other hams reports. I tried several bfo adjustments. Anyone help me to rectify the
By
Praba Karan
·
#116287
·
|
Re: reviving my sbitx v3
To be clear, both the receiver and the transmitter use that mixer.? It translates the signal from the 40MHz IF frequency to the operating frequency in both directions.
73
Evan
AC9TU
By
Evan Hand
·
#116286
·
|
Re: reviving my sbitx v3
I figured it had something to do with the reception, as when I first turned it back on and the receiver appeared to be "deaf", but yes, right around the halfway point it picked up again. I appreciate
By
Michael Bales
·
#116285
·
|
Re: reviving my sbitx v3
Glad you fixed it!? The other pot is used to adjust the "bias" for the mixer:
The adjustment does not seem critical.? I would set it to the midpoint and verify that the receiver is sensitive and
By
Evan Hand
·
#116284
·
|
Re: reviving my sbitx v3
Evan, I finally got it going! My problem was having more than one problem at a time. Once I replaced everything in the circuit, fixed dry or bridged joints, and put a new set of finals in, it now
By
Michael Bales
·
#116283
·
|
Re: uBITX v6 Low Audio - Back at it again - FIXED
Glad you fixed it and that I could be of help.
73
Evan
AC9TU
By
Evan Hand
·
#116282
·
|
Re: uBITX v6 Low Audio - Back at it again - FIXED
Hello all, and thank you for helping me getting my uBITX V6 up and running again. I replaced C30 this morning and I now have audio. Next will be alignment, BFO, and the frequency display is off. So
By
Richard AG5M
·
#116281
·
|
Simple12m TRX QRPp DSB
I built a new trx ...12m DSB ft8.
https://www.qsl.net/py2ohh/trx/12mft8trx/12mft8trx.html
It is a simple TRX using one TA7358 and 7 x 2N2222 ... 800mW .
73 de py2ohh miguel
By
Miguel Angelo Bartie
·
#116280
·
|
Re: RX uBITXv5 from scratch
Thanks for sharing!
Li
By
Li Cao
·
#116279
·
|
Re: RX uBITXv5 from scratch
Looks nice. Congratulations!
73s John N4HNO
By
Tech Guy
·
#116278
·
|
Re: RX uBITXv5 from scratch
By
IU7SUX Antonio
·
#116277
·
|
RX uBITXv5 from scratch
Hello everyone, I realize I'm late to the topic, but after a course by the ARI Parma association on the uBITX V5, I wanted to try my hand at designing a single-sided PCB for the receiver part only
By
IU7SUX Antonio
·
#116276
·
|
Re: sBitx Mic input - assist request
I got this element and stuffed cotton balls in the housing and get GREAT audio reports
PUI Audio, Inc. AOM-5024L-HD-R
By
Doug Backer
·
#116275
·
|
Re: sBitx Mic input - assist request
Was there a mic input modification for the sBtx DE because I am getting reports of bad or distorted audio.
The mic element I am using was the one that came in the uBitx v3 kit.
Was thinking of
By
kc5kwz
·
#116274
·
|
Re: sBitx v3 - problem with nonstandard callsigns
I have cloned https://github.com/gdyuldin/ft8_lib and added my suffixed callsigns to the test: OE/SP5DAA, DE/SP5DAA, SP5DAA/2, SP5DAA/P (in ft8_lib/test/test.c)
Only SP5DAA/P is encoded and decoded
By
WZab - SP5DAA
·
#116273
·
|
Re: zbitz changes
I agree with most of Ken and Lee's points.? What is not mentioned is the enormous amount of software that Ashhar Farhan used that is open source and may not be available for the "lower cost/higher
By
Evan Hand
·
#116272
·
|
Re: zbitz changes
" If he had been much earlier in the design process, a more powerful CPU may have been a better answer, but it is not practical at this point"
Not to pick nits, but I was under the impression that
By
Ken N2VIP
·
#116271
·
|