开云体育

I have a sbitx dev that was working. I updated to 3.021. I rebooted and everything is working except for the FT8 decode. I thought it may be because of the time being off but I ntp update and it is

Hi, I am selling my sBitX V3 in mint condition only used a couple of times as still use my IC-705 with SDR-Console on my MacBook, just so familiar with them. It is on eBay at ?275 plus postage

Hi! The sBitx is still delivered with a Raspberry Pi 4. There is currently no communication from the producer that this will change since it is fast enough for the intended task. Farhan also stated

There's probably a lack of shading here, because I see such a bright screen at IF above 85. -- Gyula HA3HZ

Update on Pi Zero 2W testing... I *CAN* run 3rd party apps with a remote display without too many issues. For example, I am using WSJTX with it X-11 forwarding via MobaXTerm and it seems to run great.

Pi ZERO 2 W. I don't have access to the older processor.

The 64 Bit Image for the Pi 4 also works fine with the Pi 5. I don't work for HF Signals and cannot answer the question about when they will incorporate the new technology in their product. We've

When will the SD Card image for the Raspberry Pi 5 become a standard as the Pi 5 is the most current Pi with more improvement in the works such as RAM and SSD which will enable even faster processing

Is this for the Pi ZERO or the Pi ZERO 2 W ? 73, Joe W2JEJ [email protected]> wrote:

It works with sBitx hardware via GPIO for TX/RX

Hello JJ Does this also have Rx / TX enable pin via Pi IO ? de Charudatt VU2UPX [email protected]> wrote:

JJ, Really neat, thanks for sharing. 73.. “If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.” ― Nikola Tesla

All - I've added a sBitx SD card image for the Raspberry Pi Zero. https://drive.proton.me/urls/Z3DC674WQ0#kLrZVXnzXli6 The same methods apply to writing the SD card image as for the Pi 4

Niels, I agree fully. Unfortunately we have to spend more money but the old saying is "you get what you spend" HI HI I found out early in ham journey that alot of companies ,even reputable ones , will

Thanks N0ywb! That historical insight is fascinating

Thanks, Gary. The difference in the pins is basically only in the CRIMP area. The specification gives only 3 thousandths of an inch variation in the pin mating area. That is just about or slightly

Up to the mid 1970s the center pin diameter was different. IEC 169-8 in 1978 defined interchangeability. The diameter of the center pin in current production BNC plugs is 1.32-1.37mm

Thanks for the information. I will give it a try too. 73 John N4HNO

This tech note is consistent with my understanding about mechanical mating capability (male/female), dielectric differences and center pin diameter difference in the coax crimp