Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: sBitx, customs and management fees
Ken,
In Spain, then VAT tax is 21%. 270$ x 0.21 is aprox. 53€. DHL management cost could avoid it, but I would have to go to Madrid, do the management, lose a few hours, etc. It is the price of comfort. The online seller should, or could, include VAT in the price (this is how AliExpress does), but that's a minor issue. Public services must be paid. ¸é²¹³¾¨®²Ô? |
Re: sBitx antenna-first warning
Most SWR meters (for the HF frequencies) don't measure SWR. They just measure how far off the antenna/coax load is from 50 ohms (reactive and resistive).
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The only reason they are fixated on 50 ohms is nearly everyone uses 50 ohm coax, and it is a good idea to try to match the 50 ohm coax for minimum loss in the coax. However, the SWR measurement is usually made at the transmitter end of the cable, so the SWR across the length of the coax cable could be high. You could just be at a lucky multiple of a 1/4 wavelength that could make the impedance of the antenna/coax system (where you stuck the SWR meter) look close to 50 ohms.? I agree, the reactance part of the load is what kills the finals. There may be, indeed, "reflected" waves. But, the reflected waves don't somehow have electrons managing to fight their way in the opposite direction to attack, pillage and lay waste to the RF finals. The "mismatch" can be reactive (look too much like an inductive or capacitive load) and cause problems with power dissipation or excessive voltage when the finals try to drive that load.? At HF the only way to measure the actual SWR would be to do what the old timers did. Actually run a measuring device down the length of the cable (if long enough) and records the maximin and minimum readings.? Tom, wb6b On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 07:11 AM, Jerry Gaffke wrote:
|
Re: sBitx, customs and management fees
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Aug 5, 2022, at 11:36, Ian Reeve <ian.radioworkshop@...> wrote:
|
Re: sBitx, customs and management fees
Ian Reeve
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýAs I understand it is for the UK calculated at VAT on cost and postage plus and admin fee for the courier company.The admin fee is to cover collection of and passing to hmrc with appropriate paperwork.If the item is described and marked on the
customs declaration as a kit, I thought it was VAT exempt although there is still a admin fee for the customs declaration.These charges are levied by the customs at point of entry to your country so there is plenty of scope for miscalculation.
Get From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Peter McCracken <peter.mccracken@...>
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2022 5:27:05 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [BITX20] sBitx, customs and management fees ?
I got my sbitx today, additional 95 euro for Irish customs. Welcome to the EU.
On Fri 5 Aug 2022 at 16:42, Ken N2VIP <ken@...> wrote:
|
Re: sBitx, customs and management fees
I got my sbitx today, additional 95 euro for Irish customs. Welcome to the EU. On Fri 5 Aug 2022 at 16:42, Ken N2VIP <ken@...> wrote:
|
Re: sBitx, customs and management fees
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýOuch! As a US Ham I'm curious how the €53 VAT is calculated, since the stated value is, what, about €250-300?Sadly, the €43 for "customs management" is likely a fixed paperwork fee no matter the value of the shipment. I wonder if VAT could be pre-paid to avoid the "customs management" fee? The VAT itself is (apparently) owed & should be paid, but maybe the additional fee can be avoided? Anyway, just curious, Ken, N2VIP On Aug 5, 2022, at 05:55, ramonlh@... wrote:
|
Re: Turn off WiFi on your sBitx
I am beginning to think that the wifi signal is injected into another place than the lm380.
I have built an external board with a lm380 and the noise was there. I have tried placing a grounded screen between the pi and the digital board. Noise. I have moved the pi to "official mounting" on the backside of the display. Noise. 73 de oz9ny, niels |
Re: Sbitx group
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýA large groups.io group can get expensive (in ham radio terms), ranging from free (up to 100 users), to $20/month (up to 500 users), to $200/month (up to 1,000 users):There is an interesting option called "subgroups" that may be worth exploring (if available in our group bitx20, I believe this group is a in a (free) service tier that is no longer offered, so what is and is not included is unclear to me.) And note, the group started out to support the bitx20, then embraced the bitx40, then the uBitx, and now the sBitx. Once the initial flurry of activity dies down, I think the sBitx topics will moderate just like the bitx20, bitx40, and uBitx traffic did previously. Ken, N2VIP On Aug 5, 2022, at 09:07, Lou KI5FTY <lscalpati@...> wrote:
|
SolderSmoke Podcast #239
I thought you all would be interested.? Lots of discussion of Farhan's SDR and HDR rigs.? ?Hammarlunds.? Pete's Wireless Set.? My DX-100.? 40 meter AM.?? Here it is:? Comments welcome.? (Please put them in the box underneath the blog post).? 73? ?Bill N2CQR http://soldersmoke.blogspot.com |
Re: Sbitx group
I agree - add a new group 73 Lou KI5FTY On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 9:05 AM Jim K5KKB Steeb <jimsteeb@...> wrote:
|
Re: Sbitx group
Love this idea!!! Flip side is alot?of us will still be checking in on both Forums anyhow On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 9:02 AM Gerard <kabupos@...> wrote:
|
Sbitx group
Good morning,
I was absent from the forum during my vacation.
The number of topics on the Sbitx is impressive.
For an easier reading for those who are still at the Ubitx, wouldn¡¯t it be better to have a Sbitx group?
The moderator could create it and move all the Sbitx messages on it.
Have a great day. Cdt |
Re: sBitx antenna-first warning
Bob, That's the plan for the weekend. A stockton bridge that is continously read by sbitx. If the swr is too high, it will reduce the power protecting the PA. On Fri, Aug 5, 2022, 5:31 PM Bob Benedict, KD8CGH <rkayakr@...> wrote: Gordon's comments brings me full circle here. For tuning, reducing drive to limit power should be useful. |
Re: sBitx antenna-first warning
Gordon's comments brings me full circle here. For tuning, reducing drive to limit power should be useful.
A "tune" button that lowers power temporarily for tuning, like that in every commercial rig I have ever owned,? could make that easy. A bridge that feeds forward/reverse power info to the Pi would be a great addition and allow for the software to report SWR and protect the RF amp. Pi Picos are readily available for ~$5 which have 12 bit ADC and can do some local processing, then communicate to the Pi 4 by I2C. The Pico could even yank a Pi 4 GPIO? pin down to let an ISR immediately cut RF power if needed. The Pico would be loafing along with this task and could easily do other low level tasks for the radio. Run the coffee maker? -- ? 73 ??? Bob? KD8CGH |
Re: Turn off WiFi on your sBitx
Have we made any progress on this noise?? I received my sBitx yesterday, and with the wifi enabled, its unusable due to the transient noises.? As mentioned earlier, adjusting the volume doesn't affect it, nor does having connected or disconnected to the antenna, or whether it's connected to a battery or a power supply.
|
Re: sBitx antenna-first warning
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýOh! ?I made a judgement with insufficient information. ?My wife says I do that often with her¡.. but she¡¯s been saying the same things for 50 years and I pretty much know where she is going. Someone famous once said ¡°Two ears. One tongue. ?Used best in that order.¡±Dave K8WPE David J. Wilcox¡¯s iPad On Aug 5, 2022, at 6:28 AM, Scott KE8KYP <scott_massey@...> wrote:
|
to navigate to use esc to dismiss