Re: V6 radino on V5 board?
From Farhan's post of /g/BITX20/message/73708 So the answer is yes, you can update a v5 to have a v6 style display. No need to swap out the entire Raduino, just the display itself.
By
Jerry Gaffke
·
#73830
·
|
Re: ubitx v6, refactored code
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 21:58, Ashhar Farhan <farhanbox@...> wrote: > > There is no problem with the firmware on the shipped units. They wouldn't work at all if the firmware didnt compile. > A
By
Adrian Chadd
·
#73829
·
|
Re: ubitx v6, refactored code
Yes, its frustrating that the simplest problems take so long to track down. That was certainly a DOH! moment (slaps head...). It's on me, not you. I often preach 'Look for the simplest problems
By
Rick Green
·
#73828
·
|
V6 radino on V5 board?
Will it be possible to purchase a V6 Radino only and adapt it to a V5 main board? Could this be a possible future upgrade path? Inquiring minds want to know.
By
A Kiddoo
·
#73827
·
|
Re: For Sale new uBITX kit with additional uBITX board plus display
Hi Jim, Would you be willing to sell the board only? I have a Raduino with a board I messed up... Thanks, Patrick VE9PAX
By
Patrick Pelletier
·
#73826
·
|
For Sale new uBITX kit with additional uBITX board plus display
I have a new uBITX kit and a spare uBITX board for sale. The uBITX board without the Raduino was part of a working system till I blew out the Raduino. The uBITX kit is new in the box and was purchased
By
Jim Sorenson
·
#73825
·
|
Re: Unbuilt Bitx40, uBitx - new, lower prices
Both the Bitx40 and uBitx have been sold, thanks to all that expressed interest. Ken, N2VIP
By
Ken N2VIP
·
#73824
·
|
Re: V4 TX problems and new finals
#ubitx-help
Heat sinks can't touch? what? no body told me that! (haha) I let them be very friendly with each other...I figured they like to work together.? I decided to bolt direct with no insulator, and take
By
Don - KM4UDX
·
#73823
·
|
Re: ubitx v6, refactored code
Expecting more about v.6 [email protected]> wrote:
By
VISWANATHAN R ELAYIDOM
·
#73822
·
|
Re: ubitx v6, refactored code
Antony, I am glad that Ashhar Farhan has indicated that all shipped V6 full kit units will have fully tested and compiled operational firmware when shipped, that makes me a happy camper as I want to
By
Steve Sawicki
·
#73821
·
|
Re: ubitx v6, refactored code
There is no problem with the firmware on the shipped units. They wouldn't work at all if the firmware didnt compile. A bracket was missing on the uploaded firmware as the person cleaned up a commented
By
Ashhar Farhan
·
#73820
·
|
Re: V4 TX problems and new finals
#ubitx-help
Looks cool Dan, If I remember correctly Farhan had the same Tektronix 465 model during his initial "phonestack.com" days, not sure if he is still using it, Raj may be aware of that. Anthony VU3JVX
By
Anthony VU3JVX
·
#73819
·
|
Re: V4 TX problems and new finals
#ubitx-help
And after you all made me feel very inadequate (not really, that is my wife's job) about my lack of "real" test gear, here is a picture of my very good technical guru Dan (W3BU) Techtronics scope,
By
Don - KM4UDX
·
#73818
·
|
Re: V4 TX problems and new finals
#ubitx-help
Harrr! Congrats Don! make mine a Bud ! I nominate you the next script writer for Star Wars. From your pic of IRFs - keep each heat sink from touching the other. If they touch you will not have
By
Raj vu2zap
·
#73817
·
|
Re: V4 TX problems and new finals
#ubitx-help
Great job Don and thanks for sharing, nothing feels better than able to fix something yourself. 73 Anthony VU3JVX
By
Anthony VU3JVX
·
#73816
·
|
Re: V4 TX problems and new finals
#ubitx-help
Evan, Jerry, Mark, Raj, Anthony, & Co.? First a million million thank yous. I'd buy you all a beer or three. If you ever make it to little Vienna VA, I'm good for it. hahaha. I tested the TP7->TP8
By
Don - KM4UDX
·
#73815
·
|
Re: A minor bug in the ubitx circuit
Arv, I have already posted about my scratch build (with pictures) on post /g/BITX20/message/73506? ( /g/BITX20/message/73506 ) That was my first post in this forum.
By
Anthony VU3JVX
·
#73814
·
|
Re: ubitx v6, refactored code
Steve, Looks like Jack has already put those words (what I was trying to write) much better way. I meant it in a positive way, of course you can always settle with a stable version don't need to
By
Anthony VU3JVX
·
#73813
·
|
Re: A minor bug in the ubitx circuit
Thanks Arv, it does make sense to me now. Regards Anthony VU3JVX
By
Anthony VU3JVX
·
#73812
·
|
Re: ubitx v6, refactored code
It's a two-edge sword. If someone finds a hiccup, do you want it fixed now, or 6 months from now. If you don't like doing field upgrades to your software, don't do it. Let the dust settle for 6 months
By
Jack, W8TEE <jjpurdum@...>
·
#73811
·
|