¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Re: cannot trust any version or any mod.
How much do you want for all that stuff?
By Brutus Laurentius · #66106 ·
Re: New V5 with poor carrier suppression.
Adjusting the BFO did the trick. For my v5 the BFO is set at 11.055.3
By bill richardson · #66104 ·
Re: New V5 with poor carrier suppression.
I too had this problem and yes it¡¯s all in the BFO adjustment. I was able to get mine down.
By bill richardson · #66103 ·
Re: New V5 with poor carrier suppression.
Normally in brand rigs the carrier is down around 40db, in your case seems barely 20db. The question is if there is a legal limit to this. If this is legal anyway and sounds good in both TX and RX
By iz oos · #66102 ·
cannot trust any version or any mod.
I am almost finished with my uBitx version 4. It has the following: Nextion 2.8 SDR receiver/panadapter (switch selectable with input grounding relay when transmitting.) Built in antenna switch for
By Michael Mitchell <mitchellmichaelh@...> · #66101 ·
Re: New V5 with poor carrier suppression.
I should also note that I have turned the power down on the Ubitx to make sure I am not driving the amp with more than .5 watts... Thanks Mike WA3O
By Mike · #66100 ·
New V5 with poor carrier suppression.
Group, ?I noticed that my New version 5 has poor carrier suppression. I noticed this when I ran my UbitX into my LDMOS amp and I seen about 10 watts out of carrier. I was wondering if it is due to a
By Mike · #66099 ·
Re: ubitx ver 4 for sale
Hi Peter, Further to my earlier e-mail requesting pictures I can see there is a lot of interest in the uBitX, perhaps you could kindly advise your payment details. Kind Regards M0IDR Sent from
By Ian Reeve <ian.radioworkshop@...> · #66098 ·
Re: ubitx ver 4 for sale
hello peter, Iwould like to buy your u bitx do you accept paypal as famiy and friends or bank transfer..is it running KD8 CEC firmware. regards Dave.. wrote:
By Dave Dixon <wylyeguy2@...> · #66097 ·
Re: Bitx40 dosen't receive and ticks #bitx40help
Thank you for your response. I do not have a second receiver?to check it with. The relays do click when the PTT is pushed. -William
By wlampley@... · #66096 ·
Re: Calibrating the Version 5.1
Thanks much Vic, That makes sense....I saw it went to 10mhz and that the receiver went dead, now I know why....Should be able to get it on the money now....Mike
By Michael Hagans · #66095 ·
Re: ubitx ver 4 for sale
Hello Peter, I would appreciate some pictures please. I am interested. Thankyou 73 Ian M0IDR Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
By Ian Reeve <ian.radioworkshop@...> · #66094 ·
ubitx ver 4 for sale
After serious deliberation, I have decided to sell my ubitx transceiver. I have done Raj's mods - the 45 Mhz filter inductors replaced by smd's, the new filter in front of the second mixer and the 2
By Peter Russell <peter.russell@...> · #66093 ·
Re: TX vs received frequency tweak help... #calibration #ubitx-help
I am afraid it is correct, although bothering. On 'USB bands' is the other way around, it shows 700hz above. So be careful especially during contests not to transmit outside the ham bands otherwise
By iz oos · #66092 ·
Re: separate CAT jack, without using the USB cable #ubitx #cat #raduino #arduino
Hi Sascha, Sorry to hear about the dead Teensies...ouch. Fascinating problem. After reading you email a few times and to make sure I didn't jump to conclusions: 1. your "spy" connection towards the
By John (vk2eta) · #66091 ·
Re: Bitix 40 5 Pin #bitx40
Mark, The 0.1 uF capacitor goes on the tuning pot between wiper and GND. you can add a 100 pF capacitor in parallel with L7 to reduce the second harmonic. -- Ion VA3NOI
By Ion Petroianu, VA3NOI · #66090 ·
Re: Spectrum test on the second V5 build SURPRISING results #ubitx
Thanks I am replacing the v4 today with my v5 and will start with the cw test into the dummy load on all bands. My v4 on cw 20m band still has the issue with spurs which may be the relays I have not
By Laurence Oberman <oberman.l@...> · #66089 ·
Re: How to connect ubitx microphone jack to soundcard output
You will have to remove R60 then you don't need another blocking cap. If you don't remove R60 then you need another cap. Raj
By Raj vu2zap · #66088 ·
Re: Spectrum test on the second V5 build SURPRISING results #ubitx
Jim and all, I found this board as it came from hfsignals not passing my tests. Even at lowered power out. Howerver when I reduced the drive by RV1 and increased the modulation level (mic) the Po
By Raj vu2zap · #66087 ·
Re: Calibrating the Version 5.1
I know the calibration method changed from what is posted on the HFSignals website for the v.4 boards, so perhaps the new method applies to the v.5 boards. In the version 4 when you select calibration
By Vic WA4THR · #66086 ·