¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: ubitix v4

 

The transistor must be running really hot!

Raj

At 03-02-19, you wrote:
I just soldered a third silicon diode between the original ones (the foil cut of course). No distortion anymore.

OH3WE Kai


Re: SMD inductors

 

Please send me Ten as well.? Forever Stamps OK for Payment?? I could also send a Posstal Money Order, I guess....never sent one for so little....

I am Good in the Book

Guy Skeer, KD6RGZ


Re: The sun orbiting the earth, spectrum analyzers and the uBITX

 

Tom

Indeed its a nice enough assemble a radio experience for hams around the world. Its issues are sufficiently addressable. Here I was struggling in installing Gordon's external relay board,? only because I didn't understand its interfaces. Finally it's working,? to address the harmonic spurious. I have the simple v5 version of the 45 MHz filter installed in the transmit path. I may not have it measured for a while, but these should be improved. Moving back to evaluating simple agc solutions,? and supporting those in my local club build.

Curt


Re: VCO and display don't match on UbitX?

 

Bill,?
Confused about the replies to your question.
Is this is factory firmware in CW mode with a sideTone of 1 KHz perhaps?

? if (txMode == TX_CW){
? ? //turn off the second local oscillator and the bfo
? ? si5351bx_setfreq(0, 0);
? ? si5351bx_setfreq(1, 0);
?
? ? //shif the first oscillator to the tx frequency directly
? ? //the key up and key down will toggle the carrier unbalancing
? ? //the exact cw frequency is the tuned frequency + sidetone
? ? if (isUSB)
? ? ? si5351bx_setfreq(2, frequency + sideTone);
? ? else
? ? ? si5351bx_setfreq(2, frequency - sideTone);?

Rgds,
Gary


Re: VCO and display don't match on UbitX?

 

Calibration procedure was described? by Farhan. Pl see the hfsignals website.
All the? best.

On Mon, 4 Feb 2019, 2:24 am wcurlew@... <wcurlew@... wrote:
I just finished a build of the UBitX with the nice blue metal case. I had my first QSO, worked great on 40m from Windsor CT to Winston-Salem NC. I then contacted the same station on my Yaesu FT450d, and the frequency was off by exactly 1khz (UBitX 7.147.000 vs Yaesu 7.148.00) The other station confirmed that 7.148.00 was correct. Is this expected? If not, what would be the process to correct the display vs vco discrepancy?
?
Thanks
Bill
?



Re: VCO and display don't match on UbitX?

 

Bill

enjoy the cool new rig and take some more data.? a bit larger error than my recent uBITX.? yes the usual convention is to display the (missing) carrier frequency for SSB.? see if data is consistent across 40m and check at least one other band.? there is a calibration procedure to adjust it.? [plus others will cite an alternative firmware version if you are so inclined, I am still using stock firmware for now]

meanwhile as long as you stay within the band - enjoy the rig.? I am QRV in blue also.?

Curt WB8YYY


Re: Spurs/Harmonics fixes for v4 based on v5 board design?

 

Hmm The numbers don't seem to add up for this spur.? When at 7.15MHZ it was at 5mhz when at 8.5 it was around 8MHZ spur.
Previously uploaded the pic of the inductors in previous post.

Two pics show two tone at 7.15MHZ and 8.5MHZ? Can see the spur moves from around 5 to around 8 MHZ.

Any ideas the cause and/or how to eliminate it?

Thanks.


toggle quoted message. . .

?

On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 10:14 PM, Raj vu2zap wrote:

What inductors did you use, please share a pic.

There is always a carrier leak at 12Mhz and 12-7 = ~5 Mhz could be what you see.

Most spurs are created by the harmonics of the carrier feeding back to the first BiDi amp. Changing to Axicom relays
eliminates a lot of these dancing dervishes.

Raj



At 02-02-19, you wrote:
Thanks I'll try the two tone test next. Tonight I replaced L5 and L7 Raj's fix to see if I noticed any differences. Using LSB on 7.15 into 40db attenuator get-55db main signal and I see some sort of spur at around 5MHZ that is about -85db, doesn't fluctate with voice it's constant when I key the transmitter. Wonder what could be producing around 5 MHZ.

I wonder if the v5 board redesign changes next might help. Might see if I can figure out where on the board that could be introduced.


Re: ubitx axicom relay question #ubitx

 

Thank you all for the information.??


The sun orbiting the earth, spectrum analyzers and the uBITX

 

Hi,

I was reading something on the history of astronomy and an amusing thought came to mind.?

If it weren't for early astronomers banging their heads against the wall trying to explain the complex cyclic paths of the planets orbiting around the earth we may have not been gifted some amazing math. This provided to foundation for developing?fourier analysis and likely the calculus. (and a way to discover/prove the original assumption was wrong.)

And because of the birthing issues of the uBITX and so many people interested in finding ways to improve it, so many of us are vastly improving our working knowledge of various parts of RF, radios, software and electronics.

Tom, wb6b


Re: uBITX default frequency

 

Hi Keith
I also have the ubitx ver 4 i would love mine to boot @ 1950? in topband
could you help me with this, is it difficult to do this,
when i switch on the rig it starts up in 40 mtrs ,
many thanks
John 2e0eii


VCO and display don't match on UbitX?

 

I just finished a build of the UBitX with the nice blue metal case. I had my first QSO, worked great on 40m from Windsor CT to Winston-Salem NC. I then contacted the same station on my Yaesu FT450d, and the frequency was off by exactly 1khz (UBitX 7.147.000 vs Yaesu 7.148.00) The other station confirmed that 7.148.00 was correct. Is this expected? If not, what would be the process to correct the display vs vco discrepancy?
?
Thanks
Bill
?



Bitx40 USB and Winmor

 

Here's an account of getting the Bitx40 on to Winmor on USB, from a ham who was first licensed in 1963, and who has been completely out of the hobby for decades.? Not much new to report here, just a confirmation of what others have noted, and a tip of the hat to those kind souls who have posted their knowledge here.
?
In Oct 2017, I purchased the board from Farhan at HF Signals, and a case from Sunil at Amateur Radio Kits.In.? Both arrived quickly.??
?
The case saved me the effort of trying to turn my kitchen table into a metal fabricating shop (cutting a square hole for the display would have been an adventure).? The case's pre-drilled holes fit the Raduino assembly (with the included standoffs) perfectly, and the holes in the bottom of the case were perfectly aligned with the circuit board.? A well-made case.? The case came with some parts such as a 10k pot to replace the original with the small shaft, a couple of knobs, antenna and audio jacks, and a fuse holder with 3A fuse.? Nice touch.??
?
I am powering the unit with a large 12 volt AGM battery.
?
After connecting the board, on the "Wire up" webpage on Farhan's website I immediately jumped in with number 1 on the "Alignment" list, not noticing the phrase "pre-aligned out of the box".? My failure to RTFM.? No harm done, as I became better acquainted with the unit's driver and final.??
?
With the PA disconnected, I found my unit draws 150 mA on receive, as expected.? But it seems to draw more current on transmit than expected (280 mA with the PTT pressed, no audio in the mic).? This is mildly troublesome.? Perhaps RF is getting into my VOM on transmit and causing it to deceive me.? Whatever.??
?
With the PA connected, I slowly set the PA current to 100 mA, which put the gate voltage at 4.0.? Speaking into the mic brought the TX current up to about .7A.? My SWR/Power meter reads only 3 watts out when I say "Ah" into the mic (though I'm unsure how accurate the meter is).? Good enough for now.? I have read here that there can be a low drive issue with these units.? The final doesn't get warm, and that's a big plus.
?
Tuning around with a hastily erected dipole, I heard a ton of very loud QRN.? I happened to have recently purchased a $22 SDR dongle that amazingly receives DC to light, and when I attached it to the dipole, it revealed a comb-like pattern of regularly spaced noise spikes throughout the lower HF spectrum.? I immediately started thinking malevolent thoughts towards my neighbors, the power company, and the modern world in general until I noticed that the noise spikes disappeared when I unplugged a certain 12 volt adapter I sometimes use in my house.? I contritely hung my head and carried on.
?
I added a 3 watt diode in series with the Bitx40 +12 supply, to guard against any fat-fingered misapplication of reversed polarity voltage.?
?
I found the tuning clicks a bit much, but they were easily remedied with a series 6 ohm resistor and a couple of caps paralleled on the Raduino +12 line.
?
Using my SDR dongle I was able to listen to my own voice transmitting into a dummy load.? The audio sounded fine.? This SDR dongle is absolutely worthwhile as a piece of test equipment.?
?
I wanted to use the Bitx40 for digital modes, and Winmor in particular, so I modded it to work on USB.? After reading several threads on this forum, I decided on the hardware approach (I am not interested in QRP voice operation, therefore a "permanent" mod to USB-only was OK.? Furthermore, I'm an old guy who understands more about linear circuits than about programming.? Raduino sounds to me like something I'd find at the farmer's market.)? So in order to bend the BFO for USB reception, I replaced the L5 jumper with a 5.6 uH inductor, and inserted a 2-23 pF trimmer into the holes for C103.? I adjusted the trimmer for zero beat audio at 1.5 kHz dial above an AM commercial SW station.
?
Before connecting the unit to a digital interface, I wired a series 470 uF cap into the Mic input line.?
?
The digital interface I chose to use is the Easy Digi by KF5INZ, who supplied me with one that has 3.5mm phone jacks for Mic, Spkr, and PTT.? Instructions were included, and were very clear.
?
The Winlink software works only with Microsoft, and required that I install Net Framework 3.5 on a Win10 laptop.? This mysteriously turned into a rather frustrating flailex which reminded me of why I switched from Microsoft to Linux Mint years ago.? After some heartburn I got Net Framework sorted out, and got Winlink Express installed.
?
A bit of cut and try with audio levels, and I soon made my first Winmor connection.? The RMS gateway I linked with happens to be very close to my QTH, and I suppose calling this "success" is setting the bar low.? I likely still have some tweaking to do.? But at least the Bitx40 works pretty as much as it should.??
?
The pleasure of getting this rig up and running compares with that of the first Novice CW contacts I made long ago as a teenager.??
?
Hats off to the fine contributors to this forum who so generously share their knowledge, especially KE7ER, KK6WUU, YT5AAA, and others.?? And hats off to Farhan and Sunil!

Rick N3ECZ
?
?
???
?
?
?


Re: Efficient Class E generation of SSB Using the EER Method

 

Define successful.? Its also a bit of a jump from EER amp to generating SSB?
using the Khan technique.

Right now most of the AM broadcast market is class D or E but that is far easier and?
extremely successful.? Lot of the local to me hams run that.? They have a really
nice signal and clean spectrum and run the full 1.5Kw 100% modulated signal
(about 400W carrier).

Allison


Re: ubitix v4

 

I just soldered a third silicon diode between the original ones (the foil cut of course). No distortion anymore.

OH3WE Kai


Re: SMD inductors

 

Ill take 10, just tell me pay you prefer


On Sun, Feb 3, 2019, 4:52 AM Playthatbeat Mrdj <playthatbeat303@... wrote:
Hmmm my email address got obscured in that post.. ok, so it's ei4gnb @ yahoo . com
(my call at )


Re: Ashhar Farhan #ubitx

Sudanthiram N
 

Sir let me know after sales any service? in ubitx ?? ?
Sales is only motive ?
Vu2nsk


On Sat, 15 Dec 2018, 10:41 am Raj vu2zap <rajendrakumargg@... wrote:
Sharma,

The SPURS and HARMONICS are two different issues. In my mods and tests of 3 boards, harmonics are
cured with relay change - KT1//2/3 and that reduces the spurs too.

With change of L5/7 with Shielded SMD ONLY or 45MHz LPF ONLY the spurs are fixed but not the
harmonics.

This has been tested on 3 boards here at my lab and also demonstrated to Farhan.

I don't any need for further repeat messages of the same mods ad nauseam.

Raj

At 15-12-18, you wrote:
>Why should we replace relays ?
>I remember Ashar Farhan's findings regarding source of spurs,? and he was trying to treat that section.
>
> The earlier mod was how to remove spurs once created. People had many ways, one being relay replacement. If RF signals even now assemble with old relays, they would have a reason, right.
>
>I suppose, it is better to wait and see the next version board and then adopt the mods with specific reference to that board.
>regards
>sarma
>vu3zmv





Re: Efficient Class E generation of SSB Using the EER Method

Robert McClements
 

On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 09:05 PM, ajparent1/KB1GMX wrote:
The homebrew G2DAF class C?linear amplifier of many years ago was a successful example.
73 Bob GM4CID
?


Re: uBitX PTT cycling

 

I put a ubitx in a plastic vcr case Lined the case with aluminum foil tape. Figuring that overlap in the tape would be sufficient to connect the pieces capacitively to one another.

Vic, do you do anything special to fix the inductors in place in a mobile application? Have you had any problems running mobile. My sedentary bitx radios surely don't have the adventurous lifestyle of yours.
73
Dave
k0mbt


Re: Efficient Class E generation of SSB Using the EER Method

 

I have about 5 papers on this some really old.

Bottom line, it sorta works.

Allison


Re: Efficient Class E generation of SSB Using the EER Method

 

This method is on theory. Hans and O discussed it last time we met. It was also used on a few early OSCAR transponders. a paper to this effect is listed in EMRFD.

- f


On Sat 2 Feb, 2019, 8:00 AM Curt via Groups.Io <wb8yyy=[email protected] wrote:
Jerry

Be careful what you spread. Of course feeding accurate info into a D to A converter can produce the voice, and with some predistortion correct for non linearity in the power stages. But modulating a PLL, that sounds like dreadful analog complexity. I suggest emailing an expert on PA designs, like Paul NA5N versus a debate. Anything that seems real can be tried, but this seems a bit unwieldy to me, but I don't have expertise in modulation.

Curt