Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: uBITX40 : audio is meowing and not understandable.
Newer members sometimes ask questions that have been answered years earlier because they have not read over all the archives, or they have not performed an adequate search on the topic.? Topic creep is a contributor because it makes it nearly impossible to search for topics that have been posted "off-topic" and thus can not be located in the search process.? Arv _._ On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 8:53 AM Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell@...> wrote: Thanks John, |
Re: First time startup
John Collins
Make sure your raduino is not one pin out on the main board. There are 16 pins and 17 holes. As you face the radio, the furthest left-hand pin goes into the furthest left-hand hole. If together with your other problems, you can¡¯t transmit, this might be the cause.
-- G0KFM |
Re: uBITX40 : audio is meowing and not understandable.
Thanks John,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
..for your patient response. It is sometimes tempting to berate people who re-ask the same question that has already been answered here dozens (hundreds?) of times. This list is particularly bad about subject creep and searching here is almost useless. We can hardly blame new people if they can't find the previous replies. Having a wide, international membership with language barriers can also contribute. The VFO (actually the calibration to the crystal master clock) and the BFO were both off on my V3. It took a little effort but when it's right everything works well. 73, Bill KU8H On 10/16/2018 10:38 AM, John Collins wrote:
If the audio is ¡°meowing¡± it sounds like the CAT control.....only joking! --
bark less - wag more |
Re: Radrino for the bitx40 - Spare needed
Hi Gary,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
When you say "incorrectly wiring it" do you mean you plugged it in shifted over so that the pins and socket were incorrectly aligned? Or did you have to rewire everything for the new enclosure? I have been very concerned about plugging it in right when I have to unplug it. I cannot remove my uBitx from my homebrewed steel enclosure without unplugging the Raduino and extracting it first. I made the box *small* for portable operation :) Reassembly of course requires plugging it back in those tight confines. 73, Bill KU8H On 10/16/2018 09:56 AM, Gary.ingle via Groups.Io wrote:
I have sucessfully managed to "Blow" the radrino by incorrectly wiring --
bark less - wag more |
Re: uBITX40 : audio is meowing and not understandable.
John Collins
If the audio is ¡°meowing¡± it sounds like the CAT control.....only joking!
I also have a 3 series UbitX and found it necessary to spend some time in setting up the BFO before I could get a really intelligible ssb conversation. Do a search on the Group for ¡°setting up the BFO¡±, I¡¯ m sure that will help. As regards the smoking sound chip issue, I took the precaution of soldering in a 9V regulator into the 12v line just before the chip. There is little reduction in sound volume in doing this, and it takes the strain off the chip. A search of the Group will also provide info on how to do this if you want to. The 9V regulator is VERY small. -- G0KFM |
Re: Radrino for the bitx40 - Spare needed
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýDennis Yancey KD4EPG has one for sale.
On 10/16/2018 9:56 AM, Gary.ingle via Groups.Io wrote: I have sucessfully managed to "Blow" the radrino by incorrectly wiring it when transfering to a new enclosure.
|
Re: First time startup
It appears to me that your rig is coming up in transmit. I would take a look at the line for the CW key. Maybe something is not right with the 4.7k resistor that is supposed to be connected, or maybe that line is open. I was able to duplicate your problem by holding down the CW key and powering on.?
|
Re: Simpler spur fix
Hi,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Those toroids are said to be "self-shielding". It is difficult to get signals coupled into or out of them except by the windings that are actually on the core. But not impossible. Was it Raj who told us that he already tried shielding and it didn't make much difference. The fact it made a little difference (non zero) says that maybe the toroidal inductors are subjected to intense fields. The small inductors might be reducing the exposure and thus the bad consequences. On my bench I have had to resort to placing a turn or two through a donut core to couple enough signal into test/measurement gear to get a reading. Sometimes holding a tertiary inductor in just the right position and angle worked - and sometimes not. So position might be important to this success. The self shielding feature of the toroids is a very large factor. 73, Bill KU8H On 10/15/2018 06:45 PM, Sascha Bohnet | DL5SMB via Groups.Io wrote:
Maybe this is a stupid question but wouldn't it be possible to just --
bark less - wag more |
Re: Simple spur fix
Raj, indeed I did not reply to anything. Acknowledged you have two boards with stock 560nH L5 and L7 and there was no significant change. I will see to find at a local store both values (560 and 680) in SMD format. According to the circuit description the filter is around 500 ohm Il 16/ott/2018 13:10, "Raj vu2zap" <rajendrakumargg@...> ha scritto:
> > Oos, > > You replied to some other issues, so no idea what you replied to. > > L5 and & on two board stock values was around 560nH.. they needed two more turns and that did not > help much. These filters are 650 Ohms IMHO. > > The sample book had no 720uH so the nearest I took 680nH. Make do! > > Still no enlightenment of why SMDs worked.. probably shielding and being close to the ground plane > below. > > At 16/10/2018, you wrote: > >> Are the values of L5 and L7 well calculated? The stock are 720nH, the Raj's are 680nH, but I get on software something like 530nH if the network has a 50 ohm input and a 500 ohm output. Another question is whether or not a different topology of toroids would give better results. >> >> Il 16/ott/2018 05:59, "Raj vu2zap" < rajendrakumargg@...> ha scritto: >> A close up sharp photo will help to check. >> >> V3 or V4 ? >> >> Raj >> >> At 16/10/2018, you wrote: >> >Hello All, >> > >> >I just finished implementing the 45 Mhz crystal filter fix with the 7:2 impedance matching transformer on the output of the crystal. Now I am hearing myself in the speaker when I transmit and I am seeing the carrier wave on the SA when I push the PTT on the mic. >> > >> >I not sure why the crystal filter mod would be related to these two issues. Anyone experience anything similar? >> > >> >Ripley > |
Re: Simple spur fix
Oos,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
You replied to some other issues, so no idea what you replied to. L5 and & on two board stock values was around 560nH.. they needed two more turns and that did not help much. These filters are 650 Ohms IMHO. The sample book had no 720uH so the nearest I took 680nH. Make do! Still no enlightenment of why SMDs worked.. probably shielding and being close to the ground plane below. At 16/10/2018, you wrote: Are the values of L5 and L7 well calculated? The stock are 720nH, the Raj's are 680nH, but I get on software something like 530nH if the network has a 50 ohm input and a 500 ohm output. Another question is whether or not a different topology of toroids would give better results. |
Re: Simple spur fix
Are the values of L5 and L7 well calculated? The stock are 720nH, the Raj's are 680nH, but I get on software something like 530nH if the network has a 50 ohm input and a 500 ohm output. Another question is whether or not a different topology of toroids would give better results. Il 16/ott/2018 05:59, "Raj vu2zap" <rajendrakumargg@...> ha scritto: A close up sharp photo will help to check. |
Re: I HAVE 2 AGC AND POP FIX BOARDS COMPLETE WITH DIAGRAMS FOR SALE.MAKE ME AN OFFER DAVE G0AYD
Dave Dixon
Hello Art Boelke, ???????????????? Thanks for your offer,the amount is okay for the agc board plus all componants and cicuit diagram I will weigh the jiffy bag and get back to you with a complete price.Regards Dave G0 AYD YOU CAN VIEW MY QRZ PAGE. On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 23:03, Art Boelke <art.boelke@...> wrote:
|
Re: I HAVE 2 AGC AND POP FIX BOARDS COMPLETE WITH DIAGRAMS FOR SALE.MAKE ME AN OFFER DAVE G0AYD
Dave Dixon
Hello Nigel, ???????????????? I still have one for sale at ?11.00 plus post ive been inundated with offers so seems ?11.00 is the going rate.You can contact me via G0 AYD paypal is dixontribe@... post will be say ?3.00 first class post.Let me know asap please.Regards Dave G0 AYD. On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 23:03, Art Boelke <art.boelke@...> wrote:
|
Re: uBITX default frequency
All you have to do is tune to the frequency that you want to boot to and the switch between VFO A and B
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
This saves the new freq into A. Switch back to VFA A.. next power up your VFO A choice will be default. Raj At 16/10/2018, you wrote:
As you can tell, I still haven't got my uBITX thrown together yet! A friend has one with the stock firmware from when the uBITX was first released. He commented that when powered on, it always comes up on a frequency on the 40M band. Is it a simple matter of editing a newer version of the software and uploading it to the Raduino to get it to boot up on some other frequency? I'm sure the original firmware "works" but I have been encouraging him to upgrade. |