¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: uBITX v3 programming #arduino #ubitx

 

Try cycling the PTT line and see if it switches to LSB or USB...

Virus-free.


On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 5:47 PM Chris Cancilla <Chriscancilla@...> wrote:
Well, I got the uBITX v3 assembled.? Put power to it, and it worked.
But, I am not a CW kinda guy.
It comes up on the display with ONLY CW: 7.150.000
I cannot find any manual or guide for programming.

HELP!!

--

__________________________
Chris Cancilla, W4CEC
Raleigh, NC


Re: uBITX v3 programming #arduino #ubitx

 

I do not know of a v3 manual.? Here is a v4 which should be close:


73
Evan
AC9TU


uBITX v3 programming #arduino #ubitx

Chris Cancilla
 

Well, I got the uBITX v3 assembled.? Put power to it, and it worked.
But, I am not a CW kinda guy.
It comes up on the display with ONLY CW: 7.150.000
I cannot find any manual or guide for programming.

HELP!!

--

__________________________
Chris Cancilla, W4CEC
Raleigh, NC


Re: Test equipment recommendations

 

Even a 20 mhz scope is good enough. The old analog, crt scopes dont shutter down beyond their operating frequency, they remain usable to almost twice the frequency.?
These can be picked up for a few dollars. The other really useful test instrument is a general coverage superher receiver. You can build one quickly. Keep no front end filter so that it tunes a wide range with a wide range vfo. This becomes your manual spectrum analyzer.

On Mon 18 May, 2020, 1:34 AM Gigabyte, <steven.b.hoff@...> wrote:
The speed of most of those little scopes is not fast enough for a lot of stuff.??

I got one of these used for $60?

It's 72MS/s and it's awesome.? There is third party opens source firmware for it.? With the open source firmware it can even be hooked to serial lines and display the data on the lines.??

I was originally going to get one of those cheaper little DSOs but discovered this one and just happens across one online.? It was used but still in the original box.? ?I've been real happy with it for what I do.? ?

On Sun, May 17, 2020, 10:00 <ponton.leo@...> wrote:

Very off topic. My mind is wandering since passing my foundation, getting my call sign and now waiting for a radio. The Baofeng I ordered at the beginning of April didn¡¯t arrive (woop!) and I got a refund. The next day delivery FT-65 to replace it which I ordered on Thursday is coming on Monday. My uBitx is awaiting a despatch window. My CW isn¡¯t good enough to use my Forty-9er yet. I can¡¯t afford a FT-817.


So, I¡¯m tinkering with circuits, arduino and so on. Of course whenever I google something there¡¯s an oscilloscope in the article. Since I was a kid I thought I needed one but they¡¯re pricey. Does anybody know....are those twenty-odd quid digital things any good? e.g.?JYE Tech DSO138 Mini Digital Oscilloscope. I¡¯ve heard good things about the NanoVNA and I wondered if these little ¡®scopes are reasonable in the same way.

Or maybe I¡¯d be better getting and old style big box scope from eBay and hope it works (¡°Spares only, turns on, but no way to test it¡± is the standard disclaimer)

Better still, what do people recommend for basic test equipment?

?

?


Re: Test equipment recommendations

James Lynes
 

I like GQRX as well. It has a TCP/IP interface that lets you modify settings via another program(I use Perl).

I have several frequency scanner programs set up. One has a table of frequencies for the Sun N Fun airshow.

James


Re: Test equipment recommendations

 

The speed of most of those little scopes is not fast enough for a lot of stuff.??

I got one of these used for $60?

It's 72MS/s and it's awesome.? There is third party opens source firmware for it.? With the open source firmware it can even be hooked to serial lines and display the data on the lines.??

I was originally going to get one of those cheaper little DSOs but discovered this one and just happens across one online.? It was used but still in the original box.? ?I've been real happy with it for what I do.? ?

On Sun, May 17, 2020, 10:00 <ponton.leo@...> wrote:

Very off topic. My mind is wandering since passing my foundation, getting my call sign and now waiting for a radio. The Baofeng I ordered at the beginning of April didn¡¯t arrive (woop!) and I got a refund. The next day delivery FT-65 to replace it which I ordered on Thursday is coming on Monday. My uBitx is awaiting a despatch window. My CW isn¡¯t good enough to use my Forty-9er yet. I can¡¯t afford a FT-817.


So, I¡¯m tinkering with circuits, arduino and so on. Of course whenever I google something there¡¯s an oscilloscope in the article. Since I was a kid I thought I needed one but they¡¯re pricey. Does anybody know....are those twenty-odd quid digital things any good? e.g.?JYE Tech DSO138 Mini Digital Oscilloscope. I¡¯ve heard good things about the NanoVNA and I wondered if these little ¡®scopes are reasonable in the same way.

Or maybe I¡¯d be better getting and old style big box scope from eBay and hope it works (¡°Spares only, turns on, but no way to test it¡± is the standard disclaimer)

Better still, what do people recommend for basic test equipment?

?

?


Re: Test equipment recommendations

 

Hi,

A tale of my first purchase of a used scope. In my early 20s I saw an ad in the paper (remember those?) for used trade school scope, very reasonably priced. I made arrangements to goto fellow's house around sunrise the next day. He was waiting for me in his kitchen while the rest of his family slept. We plugged the scope in and turned it on. He looked dismayed and insisted had worked only a half hour earlier.

I removed the covers and I found a bad connection. I borrowed his soldering iron and repaired it. I reassembled it and then...
I bought it -shrug- I used it for several years.

Don't give up any possibilities.

73,

Bill KU8H

On 5/17/20 12:35 PM, Robert D. Bowers wrote:
Digital scopes have some limitations - and to really use them effectively, you do need to know a little about how they work and operate.? That being said, they can be valuable too - even a 5mhz digital scope can work with audio (and to a lesser degree with RF - low frequency stuff).? A 20mhz would work for older radios (with a lower IF), but a 20mhz _analog_ is far easier to use near the top end of its bandwidth than most digital scopes - and have a more accurate representation of the waveform at the upper end.? I'd suggest something at least 30mhz... if digital, go higher than that (better representation of the waveform).? For digital, a good rule of thumb is the bandwidth at least twice the signal you might want to check.
I've got a used analog (bought at a hamfest) which works good - yeah, there's a chance of a lemon but often they're quite rugged (and if they look good inside and out, you've got a pretty fair chance of getting a good one).? Usually a few simple tests can show if there are problems or not.? If it comes on, shows traces, and the seller can show a waveform (square wave is good), usually they're adequate for troubleshooting.? I think that there are lists on the internet that show what tests to do - and what sort of problems you're likely to find based on the make and model of the scope. IME, the usual failure is dried-out power supply caps.
Here is a list of suggested test equipment:
1. A very good DVM - be prepared to spend a fair amount on this. A
cheapo model will work, but the better the model, the more useful
you'll find it in the future.? (The one I have now - I've had for
almost 10 years, and if someone hadn't torched my shop, I'd still be
using models I'd had for years before that.)
2. Make a RF sniffer probe for it.? VERY useful for troubleshooting
radios.? You can use on-the-air signals or some other source
(mentioned later).
3. A directional wattmeter (aka SWR meter) - you can make one of these
if need be - even make one that works with the DVM.? This is
important - because a poor match puts transmitters in jeopardy. It's not about "Maximum signal out!!!", it protects the finals from
being overstressed!!!
4. The next on the list: a 50 ohm dummy load.? VERY important - you can
make one (just don't use wirewound resistors!).? I'd encourage
looking at kits, by the way - if you have any experience at all with
soldering (start with simple kits and you can develop adequate skill
rather fast).
Less critical but worth having.? Kits, by the way, do work... and you might know someone who has an old scope lying around that they don't have a use for.? I've got a couple of pieces of equipment I built from kits - and have considered others.
1. Here is where I'd put a scope - they may not be essential, but if
you have any experience at all with them, they're that useful (make
sure you have bandwidth in excess of the signal you expect to check).
2. Almost as important - a signal source.? There are DDO kits available
that are inexpensive and they do an adequate job (although the
signal isn't that clean/pure).
3. Make or buy a step attenuator (for the signal source) - if you don't
luck out and find one.
4. Here is where I'd put something like a VNA or other antenna checker.
5. It goes on from there.? I'd even suggest something like a "grid
dipper" or similar - they are VERY useful, especially when checking
things like toroids and caps.? I used to have one - and miss it.
6. Here's another good one - for checking many components.? It's called
a "zener Sweeper" - and I used to have one.? There may be other
little things like that.
7. I thought I'd mention a RF bridge.? I bought a wide-band bare-bones
one from China, and I'd previously built a dBm meter (combined chip
and components with an arduino).? You can combine these with a DDO
signal generator and do all sorts of neat stuff - even synthesize
something resembling a dipper!
8. The rest is per personal preference.? One more thing - don't stint
on the soldering iron.? Get a good one (you don't have to break the
bank to find a good one... temperature controlled and grounded). Ditto for small tools - a good wire nipper is very important
(especially for kits).
_VERY important - do your best to get manuals (including service if available) for everything_!!!? They can save tons of headache and heartache!
Good luck... and I hope this helps.
Bob
N4FBZ (First licensed 1980, General Radiotelephone {commercial radios} 1981.)
On 5/17/20 10:59 AM, ponton.leo@... wrote:

Very off topic. My mind is wandering since passing my foundation, getting my call sign and now waiting for a radio. The Baofeng I ordered at the beginning of April didn¡¯t arrive (woop!) and I got a refund. The next day delivery FT-65 to replace it which I ordered on Thursday is coming on Monday. My uBitx is awaiting a despatch window. My CW isn¡¯t good enough to use my Forty-9er yet. I can¡¯t afford a FT-817.


So, I¡¯m tinkering with circuits, arduino and so on. Of course whenever I google something there¡¯s an oscilloscope in the article. Since I was a kid I thought I needed one but they¡¯re pricey. Does anybody know....are those twenty-odd quid digital things any good? e.g. JYE Tech DSO138 Mini Digital Oscilloscope. I¡¯ve heard good things about the NanoVNA and I wondered if these little ¡®scopes are reasonable in the same way.

Or maybe I¡¯d be better getting and old style big box scope from eBay and hope it works (¡°Spares only, turns on, but no way to test it¡± is the standard disclaimer)

Better still, what do people recommend for basic test equipment?
--
bark less - wag more


Re: Slowing down Tx to Rx

 

Hi Evan,

Thanks again I will give that a try . It's the delay in going back from Tx to Rx that I am after altering. It's just to stop the relay changing when using very slow CW.

Reg,????????? G4NFR

"The value delays the change from transmitting back to receive. As I stated in the prior message, it is in milliseconds, so you would need to enter a value that is large to note a difference. Try 2000 for a 2-second delay.

I am not aware of a way to delay the start of transmission (from RX to TX) if that is what you want.? You could add it to the Nano program.
Reg,

The value delays the change from transmitting back to receive. As I stated in the prior message, it is in milliseconds, so you would need to enter a value that is large to note a difference. Try 2000 for a 2-second delay.

I am not aware of a way to delay the start of transmission (from RX to TX) if that is what you want.? You could add it to the Nano program."


Re: LIVE icon added to bitxmap.com

 

I have been on for the last hour and no one has shown up as "live".? Going off line now.

73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: Getting enough power to check SWR with BITx40

jim
 

Try a "two-tone tester" ..more consistant results than the "ahhhhj" method

Jim

On Sunday, May 17, 2020, 9:27:08 AM PDT, Scott <sskroch@...> wrote:


Thanks to every one that replied to my question.? I now understand that for single side band the power should be very low (or zero) with no microphone input (which is consistent with my observations).? My son and I can work out the details of how to get a signal into the radio for making the measurements.? I will take a look at implementing a CW mod for the BITx40, I have seen instructions for this online. Introducing a tone into the mic might get my son up and running the fastest.

Thanks,
Scott


Re: Test equipment recommendations

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

You'll encounter all sorts at hamfests, and find some really decent people there (as well as monsters).? My good scope (needed for my research) - the guy sold it to me for a price I could afford, but with extracting a promise I wouldn't try to turn around and sell it for a profit - that I was going to use it!? (Ditto for my BitX20 which I plan to convert to 10 meters.)? I've lucked out on a few other items - and look forward to hamfests starting up again (I've got a bunch of 'junque' I want to trade off - clear out storage a bit and have some fun!)

I'd add to your comments:

For someone seeking 'start-out' test equipment, see if you can find a local experienced ham in your area who'd be willing to go with you (maybe even a group - it's been known to happen).? Someone who is really knowledgeable and experienced can often spot the ugly-as-h*ll-but-a-real-deal items, and know what to avoid.? As you wrote, you might even find someone who enjoys helping out 'newbies' and would be willing to give someone equipment (I've been known to do that - and I've known hams who did).? Indeed, one of the people on this server gave me a BitX40!? (It's a prized piece, set up for portable/emergency comm use - doubly so as it reminds me of a kindness I experienced).?

The more people work together and help each other out, the more fun it can be!

Bob

On 5/17/20 12:54 PM, Randy.AB9GO wrote:

Go to a hamfest in your local area when they return ??.? It may be hit-or-miss if you find an oscilloscope but if you ask around I'm sure someone will have one that they will sell for a reasonable price or since you're starting out sometimes a freebie comes along that works.? It can be a great source for other test equipment also.? If you buy an oscilloscope locally at least you can try it out and make sure it works. I have found eBay to be really hit or miss and usually much too expensive for test equipment.? To get started a 20 megahertz analog scope is just fine and usually they're quite inexpensive.? Most of us didn't have anything better than that until the rash of cheaper Chinese scopes became available a few years ago.? They just cost too much for the experimenter back in the day.? If you can find a used? Rigol Ds1102E scope they make an excellent entry-level scope. Just don't pay too much for it. $100-$150 would be about the max for it since the newer?DS1054Z?is out and commonly available for $350. And for that money it must have all the probes included!??

Hopefully you'll be able to find what you need. One thing to remember at hamfests some people price their stuff realistically and it always is a good idea to offer less for the item than the asking price. Most people come down somewhat.? Do a little research and see what things are selling for on websites like eham or qrz.? You always run into the seller though that will not come down in price and their asking price is just ridiculous ie eBay prices and higher.? Just move on to the next table.? Not everyone is trying to find a sucker.? ?

randy.ab9go@....



This message sent to you from my mobile device via speech-to-text technology.


Re: LIVE icon added to bitxmap.com

 

Checked again and no one is listed as live EXCEPT for the Icon that I changed.

73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: LIVE icon added to bitxmap.com

 

JohnR
Here are the instructions from Doug W:
/g/BITX20/message/78958

FYI:
There are links at the bottom of the email that you receive:
Groups.io Links:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#79011)?|?Reply To Group?|?Reply To Sender?|?Mute This Topic?|?New Topic


?The original BITX
?BITX40 by HFSignals
?uBITX by HFSignals
?BITX Store by Sunil
?BITX Web Site of Mike ZL1AXG
/g/BITX20/wiki/home?Wiki
Your Subscription?|?Contact Group Owner?|?Unsubscribe?[elhandjr@...]
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

You can click on the?View/Reply Online (#79011) This will open the message on the Groups.io web site.? If you click on that and then on the "View All Messages in Topic" you can see the full history of the thread.? That is where I got the link to the instructions.

This is the same for all Groups.io threads that you subscribe to.

73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: Test equipment recommendations

 

I forgot all about this!

One more (really inexpensive) thing to add to the list - a decent SDR dongle.? I spent less than $30 for mine - and I've used it rather like a spectrum analyzer (1mhz window on frequency - maximum, but any frequency center from below 28 mhz to 1400), it also can be used to check deviation in a FM rig, and when connected to the if of a rig (through a buffer amp) - a VERY sensitive band scope (I've also used it to really clean up signals I couldn't understand).? I use mine with GQRX - quite pleased with it.

A computer (or even tablet/phone) can be used for other tests as well - with decent audio in/out (adequate bandwidth/low distortion).

Bob


Re: Test equipment recommendations

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I've thought about a decent SA, but have never had the money (or the luck to find one).? Thanks for the reminder about the RSP1A.

I've been using my SDR dongle for checking spectra - it's limited to 1 mhz of the spectrum at a time, but it CAN be used to check FM deviation and so on - plus purity of signal (and even give indications of how far down spurs and so on are).? That's pretty good for something less than $20 - and I forgot to add that to the list I put up!

Bob


On 5/17/20 11:52 AM, Evan Hand wrote:

For me, the basic is:
1 - DMM
2 - An SWR/Power meter
3 - A 100Mhz or better oscilloscope
4 - A PC

Nice to have if you are going to do surgery, PA mods, or antenna experiments:
1 - An SDR Play RSP1A with a -50 DB tap and step attenuator to use as a Spectrum Analyzer (SA)?
2 - NanoVNA or Antuino (from HF Signals)
3 - 50MHz signal generator

Really nice to have:
1 - 2 GHz spectrum analyzer (Sigelent or Rigol)

All of the DSO Oscilloscopes that I have seen are only good to 1 MHz or so.? You really need the 100 MHz to do testing on a superheterodyne transceiver like the uBITX.

I have been pleasantly surprised by the flexibility and usefulness of the SDR Play RSP1A as a SA.? Of course, I would really like a Sigelent or Rigol SA, just not ready to spend $1,000+.

Above are my thoughts, others may be different, and YMMV.
Good Luck
73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: Test equipment recommendations

 

Go to a hamfest in your local area when they return ??.? It may be hit-or-miss if you find an oscilloscope but if you ask around I'm sure someone will have one that they will sell for a reasonable price or since you're starting out sometimes a freebie comes along that works.? It can be a great source for other test equipment also.? If you buy an oscilloscope locally at least you can try it out and make sure it works. I have found eBay to be really hit or miss and usually much too expensive for test equipment.? To get started a 20 megahertz analog scope is just fine and usually they're quite inexpensive.? Most of us didn't have anything better than that until the rash of cheaper Chinese scopes became available a few years ago.? They just cost too much for the experimenter back in the day.? If you can find a used? Rigol Ds1102E scope they make an excellent entry-level scope. Just don't pay too much for it. $100-$150 would be about the max for it since the newer?DS1054Z?is out and commonly available for $350. And for that money it must have all the probes included!??

Hopefully you'll be able to find what you need. One thing to remember at hamfests some people price their stuff realistically and it always is a good idea to offer less for the item than the asking price. Most people come down somewhat.? Do a little research and see what things are selling for on websites like eham or qrz.? You always run into the seller though that will not come down in price and their asking price is just ridiculous ie eBay prices and higher.? Just move on to the next table.? Not everyone is trying to find a sucker.? ?

randy.ab9go@....



This message sent to you from my mobile device via speech-to-text technology.


Re: Test equipment recommendations

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Digital scopes have some limitations - and to really use them effectively, you do need to know a little about how they work and operate.? That being said, they can be valuable too - even a 5mhz digital scope can work with audio (and to a lesser degree with RF - low frequency stuff).? A 20mhz would work for older radios (with a lower IF), but a 20mhz analog is far easier to use near the top end of its bandwidth than most digital scopes - and have a more accurate representation of the waveform at the upper end.? I'd suggest something at least 30mhz... if digital, go higher than that (better representation of the waveform).? For digital, a good rule of thumb is the bandwidth at least twice the signal you might want to check.

I've got a used analog (bought at a hamfest) which works good - yeah, there's a chance of a lemon but often they're quite rugged (and if they look good inside and out, you've got a pretty fair chance of getting a good one).? Usually a few simple tests can show if there are problems or not.? If it comes on, shows traces, and the seller can show a waveform (square wave is good), usually they're adequate for troubleshooting.? I think that there are lists on the internet that show what tests to do - and what sort of problems you're likely to find based on the make and model of the scope.? IME, the usual failure is dried-out power supply caps.?

Here is a list of suggested test equipment:
  1. A very good DVM - be prepared to spend a fair amount on this.? A cheapo model will work, but the better the model, the more useful you'll find it in the future.? (The one I have now - I've had for almost 10 years, and if someone hadn't torched my shop, I'd still be using models I'd had for years before that.)
  2. Make a RF sniffer probe for it.? VERY useful for troubleshooting radios.? You can use on-the-air signals or some other source (mentioned later).
  3. A directional wattmeter (aka SWR meter) - you can make one of these if need be - even make one that works with the DVM.? This is important - because a poor match puts transmitters in jeopardy.? It's not about "Maximum signal out!!!", it protects the finals from being overstressed!!!
  4. The next on the list: a 50 ohm dummy load.? VERY important - you can make one (just don't use wirewound resistors!).? I'd encourage looking at kits, by the way - if you have any experience at all with soldering (start with simple kits and you can develop adequate skill rather fast).

Less critical but worth having.? Kits, by the way, do work... and you might know someone who has an old scope lying around that they don't have a use for.? I've got a couple of pieces of equipment I built from kits - and have considered others.

  1. Here is where I'd put a scope - they may not be essential, but if you have any experience at all with them, they're that useful (make sure you have bandwidth in excess of the signal you expect to check).
  2. Almost as important - a signal source.? There are DDO kits available that are inexpensive and they do an adequate job (although the signal isn't that clean/pure).
  3. Make or buy a step attenuator (for the signal source) - if you don't luck out and find one.
  4. Here is where I'd put something like a VNA or other antenna checker.
  5. It goes on from there.? I'd even suggest something like a "grid dipper" or similar - they are VERY useful, especially when checking things like toroids and caps.? I used to have one - and miss it.
  6. Here's another good one - for checking many components.? It's called a "zener Sweeper" - and I used to have one.? There may be other little things like that.
  7. I thought I'd mention a RF bridge.? I bought a wide-band bare-bones one from China, and I'd previously built a dBm meter (combined chip and components with an arduino).? You can combine these with a DDO signal generator and do all sorts of neat stuff - even synthesize something resembling a dipper!
  8. The rest is per personal preference.? One more thing - don't stint on the soldering iron.? Get a good one (you don't have to break the bank to find a good one... temperature controlled and grounded).? Ditto for small tools - a good wire nipper is very important (especially for kits).

VERY important - do your best to get manuals (including service if available) for everything!!!? They can save tons of headache and heartache!

Good luck... and I hope this helps.

Bob

N4FBZ (First licensed 1980, General Radiotelephone {commercial radios} 1981.)


On 5/17/20 10:59 AM, ponton.leo@... wrote:

Very off topic. My mind is wandering since passing my foundation, getting my call sign and now waiting for a radio. The Baofeng I ordered at the beginning of April didn¡¯t arrive (woop!) and I got a refund. The next day delivery FT-65 to replace it which I ordered on Thursday is coming on Monday. My uBitx is awaiting a despatch window. My CW isn¡¯t good enough to use my Forty-9er yet. I can¡¯t afford a FT-817.


So, I¡¯m tinkering with circuits, arduino and so on. Of course whenever I google something there¡¯s an oscilloscope in the article. Since I was a kid I thought I needed one but they¡¯re pricey. Does anybody know....are those twenty-odd quid digital things any good? e.g.?JYE Tech DSO138 Mini Digital Oscilloscope. I¡¯ve heard good things about the NanoVNA and I wondered if these little ¡®scopes are reasonable in the same way.

Or maybe I¡¯d be better getting and old style big box scope from eBay and hope it works (¡°Spares only, turns on, but no way to test it¡± is the standard disclaimer)

Better still, what do people recommend for basic test equipment?

?

?



Re: Getting enough power to check SWR with BITx40

 

Scott,

For years I've been using a free app for my iPhone called Tone Generator, it comes up outputting a 1000hz sine wave tone, I just put it by the mic and key up then make my tuner adjustments. It's been working great for a long time.

Joel
N6ALT


Re: LIVE icon added to bitxmap.com

 

I am sorry I may have missed something or just can't figure it out. How do we go "live" on the map or change an icon or what do each icon mean. Is there a legend?or instructions I am missing? I made it on the least.
KG4VHV
john

--

¡°A single light can banish the darkness¡±

Lux e tenebris?

"A fool stares?at the finger that points at the moon"
I Ching




Re: #calibration #v5 #calibration #v5

 

All of you are giving me more credit than is due.? If you would read as many of the posts here as I do, you would gain the same or more knowledge.? It is the advantage of being retired (lots of free time).

There are others on this board that are more knowledgable than I, they have other jobs or commitments such that I get in the first post.? I would head anyone that does provide another point of view, as they may have the first-hand experience that I do not.? I do try to point out my limits so that if another does provide input you can judge for yourself.

Again, Thank you for the kind words.
73
Evan
AC9TU