¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: [BITxV6] BRICKED recovery help needed

 

Hi Andy,

I'm not sure what specific zip file you're referring to, but it may be that the zip file just has the source code, and you would have to use the Arduino IDE in order to compile and load it onto your nano.

I've attached a .hex file that I just built from my pdq_gfx_update branch. Maybe you can load it?


Reed


Re: ubitx #v6 Screen Speed Mod #v6

 

Hi Ashhar,

I had noticed that you inlined the other stuff, so I added the files to the project, but put them into their own folder within the ubitx project. That way, newbies don't have to know how to install libraries (since the important files from the library are in the ./PDQ_MinLib/ folder), but it still makes it clear that those files came from "elsewhere". Would you prefer that I "flatten" the structure, and put the PDQ library files directly in the main directory?


Reed


Re: Help with troubleshooting Bitx40 - no transmit. #bitx40help

 

No but they are in parallel with junctions?of the transistor so if it is shorted internally they will read zero...

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 8:29 PM <Hetzal@...> wrote:
Would Q13 cause those resisters to fry?


Re: [BITxV6] BRICKED recovery help needed

 

Andy,

As I understand it, the uBitx worked fine when it arrived.
You did some stuff and now it does not.

> I am hoping they will just replace the whole daughter board combination of TFT display and nano board.?

Good luck with that.

Jerry



On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 07:29 PM, Andy_501 wrote:

I am hoping they will just replace the whole daughter board combination of TFT display and nano board. If I upload Blink the status message says it transferred properly but on a power cycle restart the display comes up blank anyway. The USB comm portion seems like it is working with a valid transfer status message on the upload there is just no display. With no detailed tech info on programs or processes of diagnostic nature or configuration software to run from the laptop the only logical conclusion is that the display itself is what is defective It appears.

If I was familiar and experienced enough to be able to run some sort of other program modules like settings manager or memory manager or any other types I might be better able to come up with better half-split diagnosis. Like if I could load up a program and run it in say something like a single step or debug mode and get some feedback on statuses of what components were working and what wasn't that would be helpful. The only thing the Arduino GUI tool does is upload, which is apparently working to get hex code into memory but no associated GUI on the laptop to get any feedback.


Re: [BITxV6] BRICKED recovery help needed

Andy_501
 

The V6 hex code file is missing when I unzip it. It shows up if I download the V5 zip file and extract it.

via my shoephone

Sent from
On Jan 7, 2020, at 21:47, Reed N <greenkid336600+groupsio@...> wrote:

Hi Andy,

The default "Blink" sketch built into the Arduino IDE blinks the LED on pin 13 of the Arduino Nano, not the TFT screen. I'll take a stab and figuring out the white screen stuff tonight and will report back if I figure out a software-based fix.

In the mean time, since you can upload code, can you try uploading either Ashhar's master branch, or my pdq_gfx_update branch? In my experience, after uploading new code, the arduino resets and then the screen works.


Reed


Re: [BITxV6] BRICKED recovery help needed

 

Hi Andy,

The default "Blink" sketch built into the Arduino IDE blinks the LED on pin 13 of the Arduino Nano, not the TFT screen. I'll take a stab and figuring out the white screen stuff tonight and will report back if I figure out a software-based fix.

In the mean time, since you can upload code, can you try uploading either Ashhar's master branch, or my pdq_gfx_update branch? In my experience, after uploading new code, the arduino resets and then the screen works.


Reed


Re: ubitx #v6 Screen Speed Mod #v6

 

Reed,
I am keeping ubitx code free of any libraries that don't ship with standard arduino. Life is already tough for a newbie ubitx owner.
Can you back port the assembler code directly into the routines of nano-gui.cpp? I imagine that rewriting displayHline, displayVline and displayPixel are the only routines that need be fixed?
I can them pull them in.
- f


On Wed 8 Jan, 2020, 8:38 AM W2CTX, <w2ctx@...> wrote:
Hope this is taken in a friendly way:
A post about interrupt driven encoder code should not have
a subject of ubitx #v6 Screen Speed Mod!? This happens
all the time and it confuses people!? Try starting a new
subject line.


> On January 7, 2020 at 9:58 PM Reed N <greenkid336600+groupsio@...> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I'm reluctant to accept PRs into the pdq_gfx_update branch until Ashhar gets it merged into his master, since it's usually best practice to keep each PR focused on a single change, but I'd be very interested in seeing your interrupt-based encoder branch, and definitely would recommend you create a PR for it to be merged into Ashhar's master after the pdq_gfx_update is merged in.
>
> Reed
>
>
>




Re: [BITxV6] BRICKED recovery help needed

Andy_501
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I am hoping they will just replace the whole daughter board combination of TFT display and nano board. If I upload Blink the status message says it transferred properly but on a power cycle restart the display comes up blank anyway. The USB comm portion seems like it is working with a valid transfer status message on the upload there is just no display. With no detailed tech info on programs or processes of diagnostic nature or configuration software to run from the laptop the only logical conclusion is that the display itself is what is defective It appears.

If I was familiar and experienced enough to be able to run some sort of other program modules like settings manager or memory manager or any other types I might be better able to come up with better half-split diagnosis. Like if I could load up a program and run it in say something like a single step or debug mode and get some feedback on statuses of what components were working and what wasn't that would be helpful. The only thing the Arduino GUI tool does is upload, which is apparently working to get hex code into memory but no associated GUI on the laptop to get any feedback.

On 2020-01-07 9:16 p.m., Reed N wrote:

Andy,

Are you sure that your nano is broken? On my bench setup,? my screen comes up all white fairly often, but not every time. In fact, whenever I reset the nano, the screen works, so I don't think it's a broken nano at this point, but rather a power sequencing issue of some sort. If this is the case, then it may not matter how many nanos you try.


Reed


Re: [BITxV6] BRICKED recovery help needed

 

Andy,

Are you sure that your nano is broken? On my bench setup,? my screen comes up all white fairly often, but not every time. In fact, whenever I reset the nano, the screen works, so I don't think it's a broken nano at this point, but rather a power sequencing issue of some sort. If this is the case, then it may not matter how many nanos you try.


Reed


Re: [BITxV6] BRICKED recovery help needed

Andy_501
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I will look into that as a future possibility if they give me a replacement unit due to this one failing in less than 30 days. If at the price you say they decide to OK me just discarding the faulty one instead of paying shipping to return it maybe I can tinker with it a bit rather than trying to learn on the replacement one. Doesn't bode well for recommending students buy a unit as part of a ham license upgrade course if these are that sketchy in reliability department.


On 2020-01-07 8:24 p.m., Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io wrote:

Andy,

If downloading firmware to the uBitx, not a bad idea to have a few spare Nano's handy:
? ??
Do buy a Nano without pins yet soldered in place as per that Elegoo product,
since to mount it into the socket provided on the Raduino, the Nano pins must be soldered on the?
top side of the Nano, not the bottom where normal people put them.

Having spare Nano's, you can practice downloading firmware without even touching the uBitx.
Once it is downloaded, can power everything off and with proper anti-static precautions,
move the new Nano into the socket on the Raduino to try the firmware out.
If the uBitx doesn't work, you can go back to the original Nano, see if that fixes it.

Having spare Nano's also means you can play with them on other projects.
They are very useful and fun.? You might get a few of the cheap 16x2 displays also.

Many have noticed that the uBitx receiver works with the uBitx power switch off
when a USB connection from a host computer to the Raduino is made.?
The power from the USB connection goes "backwards"
through the LM7805 regulator up into the main 12v rail of the uBitx.
Though that 12v rail only has something less than 5v on it, the receiver
behaves more or less normally.? It is possible that this could blow some 5v connection
on a Nano due to too heavy a current, though I'm not sure anybody has experienced this.
Might be best to add a 1n400x diode between the main uBItx 12v rail and the LM7805
regulator on the Raduino to prevent the backward flow of current from the USB connection.?

I don't know why your uBitx failed.
At $3, the Nano clones are of variable quality, perhaps it simply died for no particular reason.
With any luck, replacing the $3 Nano (after first burning appropriate firmware) will fix your uBitx.

Jerry, KE7ER

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:28 AM, Andy_501 wrote:

I have a dedicated 12 VDC @ 6 Amps supply for the uBITx transceiver with no other load on it.? The only thing I noticed in past sessions after connecting to laptop via USB port was that if I shut off the ON/OFF Vol control it stays powered up if the USB connection to laptop is live.

Everything was working fine as I indicated and I just powered it down for the night, as I had done many times before, and it did not start when I returned today. That is why I thought maybe the experimenting with the Xloader and or arduino uploading had somehow done a bad load just blanking all previous code. I don't have a h/w reset button on his one; I would need some sort of diagnostic program to run on laptop that could comm with USB port and do a reset via comm port I think but that would have to be a different program as well.

Something like this isn't great for teaching students in a course especially when cost is as high as it is.

?


Re: Who can I call?

 

Neil

Wow you are quite accomplished, and that vertical antenna you designed may deserve being published.

The bfo calibration I found quite challenging. When it is set close enough it can be adjusted by ear. It gives maybe 99 percent of us some challenge.

First, someone here who has done this for v6 can describe it. I am honestly thinking best to work with a ham assistant there in Kalamazoo.?

73 Curt wb8yyy


Re: ubitx #v6 Screen Speed Mod #v6

 

Hope this is taken in a friendly way:
A post about interrupt driven encoder code should not have
a subject of ubitx #v6 Screen Speed Mod! This happens
all the time and it confuses people! Try starting a new
subject line.

On January 7, 2020 at 9:58 PM Reed N <greenkid336600+groupsio@...> wrote:


Hi Mark,

I'm reluctant to accept PRs into the pdq_gfx_update branch until Ashhar gets it merged into his master, since it's usually best practice to keep each PR focused on a single change, but I'd be very interested in seeing your interrupt-based encoder branch, and definitely would recommend you create a PR for it to be merged into Ashhar's master after the pdq_gfx_update is merged in.

Reed



Re: ubitx #v6 Screen Speed Mod #v6

 

Hi Mark,

I'm reluctant to accept PRs into the pdq_gfx_update branch until Ashhar gets it merged into his master, since it's usually best practice to keep each PR focused on a single change, but I'd be very interested in seeing your interrupt-based encoder branch, and definitely would recommend you create a PR for it to be merged into Ashhar's master after the pdq_gfx_update is merged in.


Reed


S-meter in 20X4 display #smeter #ubitx

 

OK, so I have two functioning V5 radio's wit Nextion screens and dueling Nanos just bouncing around with RX signals.? Now, I'd like to go retro [read: almost original] for the display on a third build. I picked up a blue-screen, 20 by 4 display that works fine with CEC V1.1 firmware (...20P_S..), other than the S-meter.? I thought wiring from the added AGC board's "s- meter" spot to the Pin 7 wire on the Nano header was sufficient.?

What did I not read???

Tnx,

Ted
K3RTA


Re: Hashtags!

Vince Vielhaber
 

Well that's fine if they don't have a bunch of messages to see before it, or leave before they see it. If they don't end up seeing that server response for 3 or 4 hours or maybe even longer, they may very well not bother.

Vince - K8ZW.

On 01/07/2020 09:49 PM, Reed N wrote:
Vince,

That's a valid concern. I would expect that anybody who sent a
hashtag-less email would get an immediate reply from the server telling
them they need to re-send their email with a hashtag in the subject
line, but if the server drops the message silently, that would be a real
problem. I don't know which of these scenarios is the real one, but it
would definitely be good to find out before turning that feature on.


Reed
--
K8ZW


Hashtags!

 

I agree that it¡¯s not going to help. Everyone has options of receiving a digest or to unfollow threads. Why create more rules when this is working?

KF4FTR

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 7:49 PM Reed N <greenkid336600+groupsio@...> wrote:
Vince,

That's a valid concern. I would expect that anybody who sent a hashtag-less email would get an immediate reply from the server telling them they need to re-send their email with a hashtag in the subject line, but if the server drops the message silently, that would be a real problem. I don't know which of these scenarios is the real one, but it would definitely be good to find out before turning that feature on.


Reed


Re: Hashtags!

 

Vince,

That's a valid concern. I would expect that anybody who sent a hashtag-less email would get an immediate reply from the server telling them they need to re-send their email with a hashtag in the subject line, but if the server drops the message silently, that would be a real problem. I don't know which of these scenarios is the real one, but it would definitely be good to find out before turning that feature on.


Reed


Re: [BITxV6] BRICKED recovery help needed

 

?I'll agree that having a spare Nano is a good idea. I bought 2 or 3 myself, pins not soldered that way I can experiment with the raduinos for other project ideas, I have a coupe of Unit's, and another bigger arduino that I bought to experiment with.
?BTW, I don't care for the green screen that come with the raduinos, so I changed one to a blue screen.
Pin for pin compatible, just had to solder
?Pins to the blue, and popped it in, so nice.
?Anyway, always a god idea to have spares when you experiment.

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020, 8:24 PM Jerry Gaffke via Groups.Io <jgaffke=[email protected]> wrote:
Andy,

If downloading firmware to the uBitx, not a bad idea to have a few spare Nano's handy:
? ??
Do buy a Nano without pins yet soldered in place as per that Elegoo product,
since to mount it into the socket provided on the Raduino, the Nano pins must be soldered on the?
top side of the Nano, not the bottom where normal people put them.

Having spare Nano's, you can practice downloading firmware without even touching the uBitx.
Once it is downloaded, can power everything off and with proper anti-static precautions,
move the new Nano into the socket on the Raduino to try the firmware out.
If the uBitx doesn't work, you can go back to the original Nano, see if that fixes it.

Having spare Nano's also means you can play with them on other projects.
They are very useful and fun.? You might get a few of the cheap 16x2 displays also.

Many have noticed that the uBitx receiver works with the uBitx power switch off
when a USB connection from a host computer to the Raduino is made.?
The power from the USB connection goes "backwards"
through the LM7805 regulator up into the main 12v rail of the uBitx.
Though that 12v rail only has something less than 5v on it, the receiver
behaves more or less normally.? It is possible that this could blow some 5v connection
on a Nano due to too heavy a current, though I'm not sure anybody has experienced this.
Might be best to add a 1n400x diode between the main uBItx 12v rail and the LM7805
regulator on the Raduino to prevent the backward flow of current from the USB connection.?

I don't know why your uBitx failed.
At $3, the Nano clones are of variable quality, perhaps it simply died for no particular reason.
With any luck, replacing the $3 Nano (after first burning appropriate firmware) will fix your uBitx.

Jerry, KE7ER

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 11:28 AM, Andy_501 wrote:

I have a dedicated 12 VDC @ 6 Amps supply for the uBITx transceiver with no other load on it.? The only thing I noticed in past sessions after connecting to laptop via USB port was that if I shut off the ON/OFF Vol control it stays powered up if the USB connection to laptop is live.

Everything was working fine as I indicated and I just powered it down for the night, as I had done many times before, and it did not start when I returned today. That is why I thought maybe the experimenting with the Xloader and or arduino uploading had somehow done a bad load just blanking all previous code. I don't have a h/w reset button on his one; I would need some sort of diagnostic program to run on laptop that could comm with USB port and do a reset via comm port I think but that would have to be a different program as well.

Something like this isn't great for teaching students in a course especially when cost is as high as it is.

?


Re: mbitx V5 versus V6

 

Phillip,
We have discovered that the Indian customs have opened quite a few of our boxes and packed them back badly. HF Signals is committed to replacing all of them. Write to hfsignals@... with pictures.
- f

On Wed 8 Jan, 2020, 2:52 AM Philip, <philip.g7jur@...> wrote:
Mine turned up with damage. The volume pot broken off the the board, marks on the touch screen, and damage to the corners of the case. Also chipped paint work.
Philip G7JUR


Re: Hashtags!

Vince Vielhaber
 

And as soon as those who use email, rather than the web interface, start getting their messages rejected for lack of hashtag, you will see a lack of messages, not an increase of hashtags.

Vince - K8ZW.

On 01/07/2020 09:18 PM, Reed N wrote:
Perhaps requiring at least one hashtag could improve people's
experience, since it would inspire people to at least choose something
relevant to their topic, and thus give others the opportunity to filter
somewhat? Currently there are lots of threads with NO tag, and since we
can't add them after they're made, there's no way to filter those
threads at all.

From /static/help:

Requiring hashtags: In a group set to Hashtags Required, all
messages sent to a group must be tagged with at least one hashtag.


Reed
--
K8ZW