¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Sotabeams DSP cw/SSB filter insertion rf in audio

 

Did you use shielded cable to and from the filter?? How close is the filter board to the uBITX board?


Re: mbitx V5 versus V6

Dave Dixon
 

So if they were rushed Thats why theres so much damage and missing parts to my v6, theres a 7 mm scratch in middle of the tft screen thers a badly bent on/off volume control..missing screws which hold the TFT to the front panel missing bnc nut.Theres a 100 mm deep scratch on let hand side of case which goes right through to the metal.theres paint chipped off on the corners of the case.I have emailed hf sigs but have had no reply,I am disgusted with this,im an old age pensioner and $199 is alot of money to me and for $199 for damaged goods this is just not good enough.All this was down to NO PACKING AROUND THE RADIO AT ALL AND ALSO NO PACKING INSIDE THE TFT screen was left to bang around inside The radio was just shoved into a cardboard box.I have sent the compliant to hf sigs via my email address daveg0ayd@...... ?? Dave G0AYD...

On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 11:22, Alan de G1FXB <g1fxb.groups@...> wrote:
Martin,

The version 6 is current and for sale through the HF Signals site.
Farhan has advised delays may occur in dispatch of current orders as the workers were working a full speed in order to fulfil dispatches before in time for our christmas holiday period.
the assembly team are currently on a well earned rest in while they prepare the next batch.
there are the two pricing options shown each taking you to their own order page.

UBITX V6 ¨C BUY THE BASIC KIT



UBITX V6 ¨C BUY THE FULL KIT


I would guess the minimal sales of the bitx40 compared to the ubitx, made the down time and reorganisation required for the assembly for the product un sustainable.
I believe Sunil(?) has advised the group of his intention to update his through hole kits, this could be an alternative learning tool for your JOTA students

Alan

On 06/01/2020 08:17, pd0zz@... wrote:

Hello to All,

I'm rather confused. Just bought the V5 version, got it up and running, including the software-change. Then the V6 started to be offered.

And suddenly the V6, which is far more expensive than the V5, seems to be the only version mentioned (but not sold!) through Farhans webshop... Confusion...First the BitX40 is not offered anymore (which is a bit of a shame, because our team of jota-amateurs wanted to buy a few sets for fresh junior-jota-amateurs) And now the cheaper mBitX V5 is also on the verge of being extinct?

In the links on the emaillist the V5 appears still on sale and available, but the V6 (NOT for sale here!) is the only one promoted in the MENU-list on Farhams website.

Link to V5 ($129 USD) :
Link to V6 (not for sale through Farhans site) :

My question to Farham: Will the V5 be taken off the sale list, as happened to the bitx40?

Thanks for your answers,
With regards, Martin, PD0ZZ from the Netherlands


-- 
Smell Czech corruptions are inevitable


Re: UBitX V6 Flrig rig xml file

 

I have not used external computer digital modes on mine, except to test rig controls. However, I use a Signalink on my big rigs and it should be no issue on any rig that has a mic and ptt input as it has its own VOX circuit to key the rig. In fact the rig I first used it on had no CAT connection to WSJT-X or Fldigi and I still logged many QSOs just manually setting the frequency (it only changes when you change bands, anyway) on the computer for logging. I had the digital frequencies saved in that? rig's memory for each band.

I am not familiar with the TI sound card, but I know others have built in a USB sound card to their uBitX rigs with a USB hub to allow simultaneous CAT control.

=VIc=


Re: uBITX V6 Headphone Jack not Working Correctly

 

Cool ;-)


--
PE3ES - F4VTQ - Erwin
73


Re: UBITX6 Will Not Select 17 Meters

 

@Jim Sheldon, in this case it would be advisable to read and note the original calibration settings before doing the actual install of a new firmware.

Also as far as I understood the findings of KD8CEC a new firmware does not change the stored calibration values.

The KD8CEC Memory Manager software could be used to read the original values before doing any changes.

--
PE3ES - F4VTQ - Erwin
73


Re: uBITX V6 heat sink temperature

 

Failure of the device can be a concern, however in the Raduino the thermal shutdown should kick in before damage to the regulator.? This will cause erratic operation of the Raduino, rather than damage.??

The above is based on the input voltage staying below the maximum value of 18 volts.? Over voltage will damage the device and cause the potential short failure.? Of course more than just the Raduino would likely be damaged in that case.

My recommendation is to add a heatsink to the regulator, especially if your are going to supply more than 12 vdc to the main board (the power amp supply is not relevant).? It is low cost and will help in keeping it below thermal shutdown.

Above are my thoughts based on my experiences.? Yours can be different.
73
Evan
AC9TU


Re: Setup uBITX for mobile and portable operations - final amps / heatsink?

 

Here's a better resoution picture of the radio box.






Re: Setup uBITX for mobile and portable operations - final amps / heatsink?

 

On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 11:18 PM, Rob French (KC4UPR) wrote:
- What's the communication between the uBITX and the remote control head?? What's the distance of that cable?
?

That's what the DVI cable is for. It seems most often used as a computer monitor cable out in the world and not hard to come by on the surplus market.? The first prototype for this was built with the original 2-line LCD display inside the control head using a 25-wire RS-232 shielded cable. There was some electronic crosstalk but it was so light that it was easily ignored.? That run was about 2.5 ft while the current line is a whopping 3', plenty enough to reach back and under the passenger seat to the radio.
?

- Did you have to change any components on the board to up the final voltage to 22V?? e.g. voltage ratings for capacitors, and/or any biasing changes.

The finals have a pair of 25V caps in the line, which are OK by a slim margin. I swapped them out for a pair of 35V caps of roughly equal value that were the same diameter & a little taller, mainly to try higher voltages. I saw no significant rise in power above 20V, though my power supply was maxed out anyway on amperage [3.5A] by the time it got to 24V.? I just called good enough, enough.?? I think I'm running about 120mA bias as a trial.

- I've got both the kit-projects BCI filter and AGC board installed.? What was the primary reason for the RF preamp (i.e. did you have a particular problem to solve for mobile?), and does it simply directly precede the BCI filter?

I found this circuit a bit deaf on compromised, electrically-stubby mobile antennas.? Not bad, mind you, but as I had good success adding the same preamp to a portable setup (see avitar) mainly because i could, it got added for good luck. One could forego that bit at first, though, given the background [cabin] noise of a mobile radio, both this and an additional audio amp helped me hear people better. The LM386 has an extra 2.2k resistor across it's input so that it avoids splatter going into a 15-amp rated amp board with its own input pot; the original vol. ctrl still acts as designed. The output to a Motorola commercial speaker is quite sufficient.?

The BCI filter comes first, and is easily wire-bridge soldered on along the short edge of this particular preamp kit board, for mounting.? The output goes to a new hole in the mainboard to connect with the AGC board on the top side.

Back to antennae:? we know the importance of a well-tuned, full-size antenna for QRP work and also of the difficulty of designing a mobile antenna that works at least a little better than a 50-ohm resistor with a length of wire trailing off of it.? My hope of working 40 meters on 30 watts to a tuned paperclip may be preposterous though there is promise on 20.? I plan to try (parked) digital modes on 40 this weekend, see how that fares as voice responses haven't been happening yet.? As mentioned, an earlier-made & known successful 20-meter antenna (on a magnet mount) showed great promise there at least.


- Do you have any close-up photos of your heatsink arrangement and fans?

No pix yet though I'll find a reason to tear the box open again, soon enough. I could draw it graphically later today....


- I wasn't clear, do you have two displays?? I.e. is there a display on the uBITX main box itself, and then also a separate display head?? Or just one, i.e. the remote display?

Just one display.? The picture of the messy work bench shows all of the sections together, more or less. Note in that shot, the mounting of the Raduino [clone] board. I? soldered a spare row of header pins onto the original pins so as to tilt the Raduino 90 degrees over on its nose to fit within the box height.. Two #8 standoffs were JB-Welded to the mainboard to offer support for the Raduino [clone] which also bears a second Nano for CEC enhancements. As there is no onboard display, the remote view screen cable connections simply attach to the Raduino former display header position. I did add a second 7805 to provide separate juice to the display.?

Next time I remove the radio for work, i.e. add a heat sensor to the fan, I'll take some more descriptive pictures. It may he a few days.? Tnx for the interest and good luck on the project.



73,

Ted
K3RTA


Re: mbitx V5 versus V6

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Martin,

The version 6 is current and for sale through the HF Signals site.
Farhan has advised delays may occur in dispatch of current orders as the workers were working a full speed in order to fulfil dispatches before in time for our christmas holiday period.
the assembly team are currently on a well earned rest in while they prepare the next batch.
there are the two pricing options shown each taking you to their own order page.

UBITX V6 ¨C BUY THE BASIC KIT



UBITX V6 ¨C BUY THE FULL KIT


I would guess the minimal sales of the bitx40 compared to the ubitx, made the down time and reorganisation required for the assembly for the product un sustainable.
I believe Sunil(?) has advised the group of his intention to update his through hole kits, this could be an alternative learning tool for your JOTA students

Alan

On 06/01/2020 08:17, pd0zz@... wrote:

Hello to All,

I'm rather confused. Just bought the V5 version, got it up and running, including the software-change. Then the V6 started to be offered.

And suddenly the V6, which is far more expensive than the V5, seems to be the only version mentioned (but not sold!) through Farhans webshop... Confusion...First the BitX40 is not offered anymore (which is a bit of a shame, because our team of jota-amateurs wanted to buy a few sets for fresh junior-jota-amateurs) And now the cheaper mBitX V5 is also on the verge of being extinct?

In the links on the emaillist the V5 appears still on sale and available, but the V6 (NOT for sale here!) is the only one promoted in the MENU-list on Farhams website.

Link to V5 ($129 USD) :
Link to V6 (not for sale through Farhans site) :

My question to Farham: Will the V5 be taken off the sale list, as happened to the bitx40?

Thanks for your answers,
With regards, Martin, PD0ZZ from the Netherlands


-- 
Smell Czech corruptions are inevitable


Re: uBITX V6 heat sink temperature

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Cheap replacement unless it¡¯s failure mode is to send Vin to Vout, then¡­ ouch.


Clark Martin
KK6ISP

On Jan 5, 2020, at 5:01 PM, Bill <groups191227@...> wrote:

I put thermal paste on mine and the heat sink is running 70 C.? Junction temperature is probably 85-90 C, which is hot.? But as-mentioned it is within spec so it should last a while.? Cheap part so failure would only be an inconvenience.? I am going to reorient the regulator so the heat sink fins are vertical for a little better convection.


mbitx V5 versus V6

 

Hello to All,

I'm rather confused. Just bought the V5 version, got it up and running, including the software-change. Then the V6 started to be offered.

And suddenly the V6, which is far more expensive than the V5, seems to be the only version mentioned (but not sold!) through Farhans webshop... Confusion...First the BitX40 is not offered anymore (which is a bit of a shame, because our team of jota-amateurs wanted to buy a few sets for fresh junior-jota-amateurs) And now the cheaper mBitX V5 is also on the verge of being extinct?

In the links on the emaillist the V5 appears still on sale and available, but the V6 (NOT for sale here!) is the only one promoted in the MENU-list on Farhams website.

Link to V5 ($129 USD) :
Link to V6 (not for sale through Farhans site) :

My question to Farham: Will the V5 be taken off the sale list, as happened to the bitx40?

Thanks for your answers,
With regards, Martin, PD0ZZ from the Netherlands


Re: Fonts used on Reed's code

 

Ashhar,

Did you want me to make these changes, or do you plan to merge the PR as-is?


Reed


Re: Setup uBITX for mobile and portable operations - final amps / heatsink?

 

Hey Ted, lots of good stuff there!? Let me throw back a few questions:

- What's the communication between the uBITX and the remote control head?? What's the distance of that cable?

- Did you have to change any components on the board to up the final voltage to 22V?? e.g. voltage ratings for capacitors, and/or any biasing changes.

- I've got both the kit-projects BCI filter and AGC board installed.? What was the primary reason for the RF preamp (i.e. did you have a particular problem to solve for mobile?), and does it simply directly precede the BCI filter?

- Do you have any close-up photos of your heatsink arrangement and fans?

- I wasn't clear, do you have two displays?? I.e. is there a display on the uBITX main box itself, and then also a separate display head?? Or just one, i.e. the remote display?

Thanks!
-Rob KC4UPR


Re: Help with troubleshooting Bitx40 - no transmit. #bitx40help

 

Your problem seems to the mic connection. Check the wiring polarity if you are using the
supplied condenser mic element. One of the two solder points on the ,ic is visibly connected
to the mic elements body - that is ground (black).

The "swr flash" tells me your TX circuit is fine.

Raj

At 06/01/2020, you wrote:
I am a newbie, with my first build. Completed as documented. Rx works well. Even with minimal indoor antenna, I received station from 500 miles away. However when I attempted Tx on 50 ohm dummy or antenna the speaker mutes and my antenna swr flashes momentarily, but no TX indication on LCD. Please give this rookie some help.


Re: Help with troubleshooting Bitx40 - no transmit. #bitx40help

 

Hi, and welcome to the group.?

Does your SWR meter show any forward power?? Do the heat sinks get the slightest bit warm after 10 seconds of CW or hard audio into the mike??

The uBitx LCD will not show RF power, at least not out-of-the-box stock it won't.?



Ted?
?K3RTA


Re: Help with troubleshooting Bitx40 - no transmit. #bitx40help

 

I am a newbie, with my first build. Completed as documented. Rx works well. Even with minimal indoor antenna, I received station from 500 miles away. However when I attempted Tx on 50 ohm dummy or antenna the speaker mutes and my antenna swr flashes momentarily, but no TX indication on? LCD. Please give this rookie some help.


Re: Setup uBITX for mobile and portable operations - final amps / heatsink?

 

Hey, Rob.

I've currently got a V5 board set up as a mobile rig, separated out by the board & other daughter boards, a display head with Nextion 2.5" screen, and Vol/Channel/Function/Mic control head.?

The Board is mounted inside a former computer external drive case, large enough for a DVD/R device and its own power supply.? This allows room for the main board, a step-up buck converter for the finals, a fan already mounted inside (but run at half speed), and an additional audio amp.? I run the finals at 22V for around 30 watts out from 80 to 20 meters; the board also has 2N5109's in the pre-driver and driver positions (1 each for 2 former 3904's apiece).? There is an mounted underneath the board (as the main board's on standoffs) preceeded by a filter and followed by an . I elected to install a second Nano processor for full TFT screen utilities with the CEC software. There was significant audio interference from the TFT screen refresh, which was reduced to a satisfactory level with small torroids around the screen's output signal path between the two Nano processors. For heat-sinking:? I took two sheets of copper and ended up with an affair that sits between the finals and the outside case, and dropping below the circuit board in the case until the two sheets can fold sideways about 5mm apart as if fins under the board by a bit.? A 5V laptop cooling fan (flat profile rather than muffin-fan profile) blows across these fins while transmitting. This fan cools the heat sink and the enclosure's own fan sucks this heat out.? There are vent inlet holes on the opposite end from the case fan.? I was able to run FT8 and JS8CALL on the bench at full power & the finals (and the side of the case) would get plenty hot but would cool down rather quickly after the rig went back to RX.? Running about half output ("only" 15 watts or so), the radio could transmit digital modes for as long as I wanted into a dummy load.?

I placed the Nextion screen inside a plastic project box and trimmed around my hack-job with cork gasket material, then mounted all of that onto a device originally intended for holding a cell phone from a dash-mounted CD player. This puts the display and touch-controllability within easy view with minimal distraction from driving.? The rest of the functions, vis a vis the manual controls were placed on a mounting on the side of the car's center console at the base of the gearshift.? This panel has the mike socket, an aux socket for digital mode in/out, volume, a function button (separate from the tuning knob), and, the tuning knob.? I added a manual push-button that emulates a CW key that I call "tuning", though I suppose it could be used for CW once the zombie apocalypse begins.? There's a mic preamp/compressor in the head for voice audio and a lesser grade audio AGC for the data, since the audio drive seemed weak in the latter and I just wanted more "punch" in my voice with the former.

For cabling, I used a disused keyboard cord for the display as only 4 (shielded) wires were needed. For the "real" control head I used a DVI cable with its four each, 2-wire with shield bundles and 3 extra wires within. That's eleven separate lines, with 4 pair of them being independently shielded.? It works pretty well, actually.??

I could elaborate some more but that's the gyst of the rig itself.? I've been trying a 10-ft whip fed with a 9:1 UnUn aftrer an automatic tuner, with minimal results on TX or RX.? That part's been a disappointment.? Just today, though, I tried a shunt-fed, NMO-mounted base load mono-band 20 meter antenna I made years ago and made an easy contact with a guy at a portable campground setup over 400 miles away. ? Considering 30 watts while driving around underneath deciduous trees and power lines in greater suburbia quite satisfactory.? I made that antenna for use with an MFJ-9420 and it never disappointed. The lesson there is, be sure to use an antenna in which you've already got plenty of faith rather than experiment with something less than optimal, only to wonder if its the radio or the antenna that stinks....?? If only I could make a 40M mobile antenna that does as well.

?If I can answer any other questions or elaborate, ask.



73,

Ted
K3RTA




Re: V6 Birdies? (spurious signals) #v6

 

Bill,
These birdies are an unfortunate fact of life for a dual conversion set like this. As each crystal of the arduino(16 mhz) and of the si5351 (25 mhz) is different by a few hertz, some multiple of one beats with a multiple of the other to produce these. However, they are never as strong as the ones you report. The strong ones are few they occur at odd places in some bands.
Can you check that these are not emanating from othe nearby devices?
- f


On Mon 6 Jan, 2020, 6:06 AM Bill, <groups191227@...> wrote:
Got my V6 assembled and tested and have been playing with it.? I haven't
made any QSOs yet, but have been using it for SWL and setting up WSPR
and receiving digital modes. I'm very happy with the build quality and
the case. The mic works just fine.? Power out (into a dummy) is nearly
15 W PEP(!) at 80 M, dropping to 4-5 at 10 M.? Frequency is spot-on.?
I've tuned the BFO using Jim W0EB's advice and the HFSignals BFO tuning
aid.? I am looking forward to the screen display speed improvements. :-)

I am having trouble with some spurious signals that unfortunately are
interfering WWV on 2.5, 10, 15, and 20 MHz.? I get prominent whistling
on each of those even with a dummy load on the antenna. At 10.000 MHz
the tone is 2136 Hz, if that is any clue.? Have I done something wrong
or is this just the way it is?? Is there anything I can/should tweak to
move or reduce the birdies?

Thank you,

? - Bill KB3T






Setup uBITX for mobile and portable operations - final amps / heatsink?

 

Hey there,

I recently converted my home rig setup to a QRP SDR transceiver, and so I've been thinking about converting my uBITX for portable and mobile operations.? I know I've seen some portable setups, haven't seen many mobile.? I do expect to simplify my controls (i.e. go back to something more like the stock uBITX!), and put it in a smaller case.? To that end, my first question deals with the final amp heat sinks.

I still want to be able to use it for digimodes, and currently I have a 60mm fan that keeps the finals cool.? It seems to me than a fan is probably not ideal for mobile operations (may not have a good installation location suitable for fan intake/output) or portable operations (seems like you'd want to minimize extra ports for debris to enter).? So I'm thinking I want to use a larger heatsink (with suitable insulating kits) instead.? Is it sufficient to simply bolt the IRF510's to an aluminum case?? Or do I need an additional external heat sink?? (Or does anyone have any alternate opinions on fans for portable/mobile ops?)

Also, are there any good resources on mobile uBITX, in terms of desired mods?? I'm thinking for example of a noise blanker circuit.??

Thanks!
Rob KC4UPR


Re: Thanks & an apology

 

Andy,

That class sounds very cool, and I believe it is exactly the sort of thing
Farhan is hoping these rigs can make possible.
Let us know how it goes, and any tips for others attempting the same.

I don't know that there is much of a "posting policy" other than to be somewhat courteous.
Maybe somebody gave you guff about the recent posts on digital modes?

With several thousand forum members, we don't always agree on how to use the forum.
The only person to watch out for is Arv Evans, K7HKL, as he runs the forum.
Dig around here and you will find posts from Arv that are not about the uBitx.?
Or even radio.

Some get upset when a thread starts to wander.
Personally, I rather like to occasionally have a conversation that goes somewhere.

Jerry, KE7ER


On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 04:06 PM, Andy_501 wrote:
Hello all,

I apologize if my posts have been broad and maybe related to other forums or threads here that I am not familiar with yet.

I am trying to get through assembling the kit and getting it working quickly so that I can incorporate it into an advanced amateur qualification licensing course outline/power point presentation so that it can possibly become something that a class would use as a practical exercise and demonstration for training purposes and still be a good piece of kit to have to participate in the QRP aspects of the hobby on a course completion.

In Canada we have three license privilege levels 1. Basic ( operates only above 10 M)? 2. Basic Plus or Honors (operates all amateur bands and modes including HF but with power restrictions and only commercial or approved equipment) 3. Advanced ( all modes all bands max power 1 KW includes repeaters and remote controlled stations).

The main thrust of my efforts is to develop a course outline and lesson plans to prepare a say? Basic Plus qualified amateur to write and pass the advanced qualification and also have them come out of the course with a working rig they can use right away. The idea was to have candidates pay a nominal fee for advanced course as normal plus the cost of the kit. If they don't pass the advanced qualification on the first try the fact that they have built the kit as part of the course taught by advanced amateurs who can then attest to the rig's conformance to regulatory requirements, they would be able to immediately use the rig while they re-reviewed the theory to attempt the exam a second time.

Given a class of say 10 -15 students a club might be able to bulk purchase 10-20 kits once or twice a year so that students could improve their qualification level and have an operational rig on air in 5-8 weeks for a total cost in the ballpark of $345.

Again I apologize for lack of knowledge in the group's threads or sub group posting policies and thank everybody that have offered tips and help to this point so I can get at course design quicker.

73 & gud DX? de VE4PER? Andy