Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
Re: Searching for IMD
Warren Allgyer
Here is more data that I am gathering for my own reference. I am sharing for those interested.?
This characterizes the gain and drive requirements of the transmit chain at operating frequency from Q90 through the finals. Sweep generator was inserted at C80 and level adjusted first for nominal 1 watt indicated on the wattmeter (Purple trace) and five watts indicated (Blue). - Gain of the chain varies from 56 dB at 3.7 MHz to 52 dB at 28.2 - Input levels at C80 were -24 dBm (purple) and -15 dBm (blue); note 9 dB input increase generates 7 dB output increase..... 2 dB compression and resulting unacceptable IMD (not shown) WA8TOD |
Re: Searching for IMD
The BITX40 has a additional stage of amplification after the final mixer. Maybe that helps reduce the signal level that goes through the final mixer to a more reasonable level.?
On the uBITX maybe putting an additional driver like the?RD06HHF ahead of the finals would increase the headroom in the design so it can put out reasonable power at 10 meters without stretching the design for the gain needed. Where the gain is more than adequate, at lower frequencies, that would allow the various stages to work with with more negative feedback (higher emitter resistors) and caps to roll of any unneeded gain at the lower frequencies. The tradeoff of the new added driver could be offset by the removal of Q912, Q93 and Q97. Tom, wb6b |
Sorry. I said aduino board replacement, my radio came from ubitx $129+10 shipping sorry for any confusion On Sun, Sep 16, 2018, 1:07 PM Arv Evans <arvid.evans@...> wrote:
|
Karan I just checked Ebay and did not find any uBITX there.? Might be interesting to see a picture from the OP to see just what he purchased. Arv _._ On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 12:01 AM Praba Karan <vu3dxr@...> wrote:
|
Transmit Problem
Larry Plummer
I assembled my uBITX as a WSPR transmitter.? I use a SignaLink USB for receive and transmit audio plus PTT.? Everything works as it should on 30 meters and lower.? On 20 meters and higher when, when PTT is activated, the LCD shows "Band Select" as if the push button has been pushed.? This is with no audio meaning no RF output.? I tried adding a bypass cap to the pushbutton which didn't change anything.? The only way to get it out of TX mode is to turn off the power.
Larry W6LVP |
Re: Searching for IMD
Henning,
For the fist stage (q90) its been tried and 20db to 30mhz with BFR106 (FT4.5ghz) is easy.? Keep in mind we are asking for -1db compression of maximum 5-7db, for that stage its not an issue. For the later stages BFR106 is unsuitable.? I've tried 2n5109 and similar and they can do that to the 30dbm level (for a push pull pair). All this is work I did last May and tested and not speculation of we do this it may be better.? Its partly why my patience is so short.? Its been done and many other have applied changes that greatly helped. For example changing up q90 for BFR106 and then all the remaining 3904s in the amp for 2n2222A(to18 or to5/39 part) is a significant improvement though 20M. its not ideal but greatly improved.? I've listed the aggregate changes in the wiki. Allison |
Re: Searching for IMD
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýAllison, according to my block diagramme the needed flat gain up to and
best a bit above 30 MHz of the first stage i.e. 20 dB makes me a
bit nervous.? Clearly 2N3904 transistors are not suitable! May be a BFR106 can do it, but to give a "clear" output power and
good IMD can be questionable. Henning Am 16.09.2018 um 17:39 schrieb
ajparent1/KB1GMX:
Henning, |
Re: 2N2222A vs 2N3904 sourcing
Jim,
For that inductor the amps I have that perform well use it. All three use different arrangements and all produce 10W and do it well.? One its a Ft50-43 with 8turns, the other its 4 turns on FB43-202 and the third uses a stacked pair of FB50-43 and 6turns bifilar #26.? ? In all cases the output translation is 2:3 turns or more for a low drain load and the feed inductor does not need to have an especially high inductance.? They are? in the range of 4x the load impedance at the lowest frequency (3mhz). One of the things to avoid is self resonance as well. Allison |
Re: Searching for IMD
Warren,
That proves first get the signal to the mixer clean and at a reasonable level.? IT also finds the needed level to the mixer? and that is under -10dbm for the available LO drive (that can increase maybe 2-3db). The power amp I've been writing about since May has issues, many, and you have cataloged them. Those being poor gain flatness, 3 vs 30 mhz.? it currently sags about 11db. Poor IMD, many reasons including stages going into gain compression and that point varies with frequency due to poor devices. Also the 3904 has a gain vs current that is a decreasing value with increasing current so the device becomes increasingly non linear. The IRF510 is operating with a Drain to Drain load of 50 ohms. the calculated non saturating power out is 2.88w at 12V. This is consistent with your 3W (at 13V?).? ?Either way the Drain load is way too high.? The transformer T11 is both undersized for ferrite volume and the turns ratio is 1:1 and we need more like 1:2 or greater.? That means a drain load of must be lower, at least half more like 1/4.? And so it goes for the entire power chain. |
Re: Searching for IMD
jim
Well ya there's that too ..But I drink coffee so...
Jim
On Sunday, September 16, 2018, 7:49:47 AM PDT, Raj vu2zap <rajendrakumargg@...> wrote:
I like the designs on the napkin with beer stains! Raj At 16/09/2018, you wrote: Indeed ..Real near what I concluded on the old "back 'o the envelope trick"? .. |
Re: 2N2222A vs 2N3904 sourcing
jim
I was specifically referring to BIFILAR inductor ....Just like the big guys do it
Jim
On Sunday, September 16, 2018, 6:48:33 AM PDT, ajparent1/KB1GMX <kb1gmx@...> wrote:
Hi Jim, Proof, it has ot make sense and consistant with my memory as i'm writer.? If you want to write a page you can. As to the L8/L9? depends if its separate inductors as is or a bifilar inductor where the impedance can be much lower as its balanced and DC only at the center plus its magnetically self canceling. Allison |
Thank you first and foremost? I apologize to the group. My signal has increased chu 7.85 nice strong my wire feeds off my cable attached to bnc connector got 200 feet 50 ohms type. I'm in apartment owner really did like amateur radio operators, any wire or antenna $300?next eviction in lease agreement. surrounded by apartment's . they are tolerant of patio furniture I read somewhere about a antenna umbrella. my patio size of a piece of sheetrock uncut I don't know the size 8 foot by 4 foot. any kind suggestions are welcome.? On Sun, Sep 16, 2018, 10:57 AM James Lynes <jmlynesjr@...> wrote:
|
James Lynes
Resonant antenna is not required on receive. I've heard over 40 states and 20 countries with 65ft wire up 10ft in my rafters with my ZZRX-40 DC receiver.? Check the BNC connector center pin. It's been noted that some have a loose fit. Check for the Raduino clocks by using another receiver.? James KE4MIQ |
Re: Searching for IMD
I like the designs on the napkin with beer stains!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Raj At 16/09/2018, you wrote: Indeed ..Real near what I concluded on the old "back 'o the envelope trick"? .. |
Re: Searching for IMD
Gordon Gibby
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Warren Allgyer <allgyer@...>
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 9:41 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] Searching for IMD ?
This is going to be way over the top for "nerd-ishism". Probably not the cup of tea for many........
The question I wanted to answer for myself was: "So.... if we can linearize the SSB generator signal chain so that it produces no appreciable intermodulation products, what would be the capabilities of the transmitter from the final mixer through the PA?" To answer that question I needed a 45 MHz, two-tone signal with no IMD. If I have that and I inject it into the new filter followed by the mixer, then any IMD measured on the output is the result of that chain and not of the SSB generator and the bi-directional amps. In essence, "what is the clean power capability of the PA section of the radio?" The answer is "About 3 watts." So I made a 45 MHz two-tone test signal by setting one output of my signal generator to 44.996000 MHz and a second to 44.997000.? Both signals are more or less centered on the 45 MHz filter passband and are the same level, 1 KHz apart. Those two signals are put into a hybrid combiner and then through an attenuator to the injection point in the graphic, the input to the new filter. By varying the attenuator (with RV1 set for maximum) I could control the SSB output of the radio.? IMD was measured at the 1 watt out level for reference and then the level increased until IMD measured -24 dB. The power level was different on each band but was a little over 3 watts for the lower three bands. For 10 meters (not shown) I was only able to get 2.1 watts at that IMD threshold. For each band the purple trace shows intermodulation (refer to the table) when the injection level is set to produce one watt. The blue trace shows the power level in dBm that resulted from increasing the injection level until the IMD reached -24 dB. So what does all of that mean? It means if we can completely clean up the SSB generator, and that looks reasonably possible, we have a 3 Watt SSB transceiver until someone tackles linearizing the transmit power chain. Lots of work to do! WA8TOD |
Re: Searching for IMD
Warren Allgyer
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 07:10 AM, ajparent1/KB1GMX wrote:
Allison "It would be adequate...? the only problem I see is the mixer has an injection of about 5dbm so any level more thanYup. That is kind of the point of the last post. This is not a 10 watt SSB radio. It is not a 5 watt SSB radio. It is a 1.5 - 2 watt SSB radio unless someone re-designs (and tests!) the RF chain. WA8TOD |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss