¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: Searching for IMD

Warren Allgyer
 

Here is more data that I am gathering for my own reference. I am sharing for those interested.?

This characterizes the gain and drive requirements of the transmit chain at operating frequency from Q90 through the finals. Sweep generator was inserted at C80 and level adjusted first for nominal 1 watt indicated on the wattmeter (Purple trace) and five watts indicated (Blue).

- Gain of the chain varies from 56 dB at 3.7 MHz to 52 dB at 28.2
- Input levels at C80 were -24 dBm (purple) and -15 dBm (blue); note 9 dB input increase generates 7 dB output increase..... 2 dB compression and resulting unacceptable IMD (not shown)

WA8TOD


Re: Searching for IMD

 

The BITX40 has a additional stage of amplification after the final mixer. Maybe that helps reduce the signal level that goes through the final mixer to a more reasonable level.?

On the uBITX maybe putting an additional driver like the?RD06HHF ahead of the finals would increase the headroom in the design so it can put out reasonable power at 10 meters without stretching the design for the gain needed. Where the gain is more than adequate, at lower frequencies, that would allow the various stages to work with with more negative feedback (higher emitter resistors) and caps to roll of any unneeded gain at the lower frequencies.

The tradeoff of the new added driver could be offset by the removal of Q912, Q93 and Q97.

Tom, wb6b


Re: Raduino fix leads to no receive uBitx #radiuno #ubitx

 

Sorry. I said aduino board replacement, my radio came from ubitx $129+10 shipping sorry for any confusion


On Sun, Sep 16, 2018, 1:07 PM Arv Evans <arvid.evans@...> wrote:
Karan

I just checked Ebay and did not find any uBITX there.? Might be interesting to see
a picture from the OP to see just what he purchased.

Arv
_._


On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 12:01 AM Praba Karan <vu3dxr@...> wrote:
uBitx from eBay??

On Sun, Sep 16, 2018, 10:22 AM <snotlarc@...> wrote:
Hi I purchased my unit in July same problem , order both board s off from eBay . my cw is week. Yesterday thought I heard cb or cordless phone , tried everything except flashing again. I'm no going to eat $139 for a device that never worked. checked all boards I never could receive we've on any frequency, only faint cw 7.033.150. any one any suggestions. 73 VE


Re: Raduino fix leads to no receive uBitx #radiuno #ubitx

 

Karan

I just checked Ebay and did not find any uBITX there.? Might be interesting to see
a picture from the OP to see just what he purchased.

Arv
_._


On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 12:01 AM Praba Karan <vu3dxr@...> wrote:
uBitx from eBay??

On Sun, Sep 16, 2018, 10:22 AM <snotlarc@...> wrote:
Hi I purchased my unit in July same problem , order both board s off from eBay . my cw is week. Yesterday thought I heard cb or cordless phone , tried everything except flashing again. I'm no going to eat $139 for a device that never worked. checked all boards I never could receive we've on any frequency, only faint cw 7.033.150. any one any suggestions. 73 VE


Transmit Problem

Larry Plummer
 

I assembled my uBITX as a WSPR transmitter.? I use a SignaLink USB for receive and transmit audio plus PTT.? Everything works as it should on 30 meters and lower.? On 20 meters and higher when, when PTT is activated, the LCD shows "Band Select" as if the push button has been pushed.? This is with no audio meaning no RF output.? I tried adding a bypass cap to the pushbutton which didn't change anything.? The only way to get it out of TX mode is to turn off the power.

Larry
W6LVP


Re: uBitx v4 new socket

Jack Purdum
 

Thanks, Joel. Anything new happenin' on your bench??

Jack, W8TEE

On Sunday, September 16, 2018, 12:29:48 PM EDT, Joel Caulkins/N6ALT <caulktel@...> wrote:


Looks pretty nice Jack, very professional.

Joel
N6ALT


Re: Searching for IMD

 

Henning,

For the fist stage (q90) its been tried and 20db to 30mhz with BFR106 (FT4.5ghz)
is easy.? Keep in mind we are asking for -1db compression of maximum 5-7db,
for that stage its not an issue.

For the later stages BFR106 is unsuitable.? I've tried 2n5109 and similar and
they can do that to the 30dbm level (for a push pull pair).

All this is work I did last May and tested and not speculation of we do this it
may be better.? Its partly why my patience is so short.? Its been done and
many other have applied changes that greatly helped.

For example changing up q90 for BFR106 and then all the remaining 3904s
in the amp for 2n2222A(to18 or to5/39 part) is a significant improvement though
20M. its not ideal but greatly improved.? I've listed the aggregate changes in the wiki.

Allison


Re: Searching for IMD

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Allison,

according to my block diagramme the needed flat gain up to and best a bit above 30 MHz of the first stage i.e. 20 dB makes me a bit nervous.? Clearly 2N3904 transistors are not suitable!

May be a BFR106 can do it, but to give a "clear" output power and good IMD can be questionable.

Henning

Am 16.09.2018 um 17:39 schrieb ajparent1/KB1GMX:

Henning,

Thanks,? One hopes that will help those that haven't a clear idea of whats needed.
That will go in the wiki.


Allison


Re: uBitx v4 new socket

 

Looks pretty nice Jack, very professional.

Joel
N6ALT


Re: 2N2222A vs 2N3904 sourcing

 

Allison,

Thank you very much. Very appreciated.

Tom, wb6b


Re: 2N2222A vs 2N3904 sourcing

 

Jim,

For that inductor the amps I have that perform well use it. All three use different
arrangements and all produce 10W and do it well.? One its a Ft50-43 with 8turns,
the other its 4 turns on FB43-202 and the third uses a stacked pair of
FB50-43 and 6turns bifilar #26.? ?

In all cases the output translation is 2:3 turns or more for a low drain load and the
feed inductor does not need to have an especially high inductance.? They are?
in the range of 4x the load impedance at the lowest frequency (3mhz).

One of the things to avoid is self resonance as well.

Allison


Re: Searching for IMD

 

Henning,

Thanks,? One hopes that will help those that haven't a clear idea of whats needed.
That will go in the wiki.


Allison


Re: Searching for IMD

 

Warren,

That proves first get the signal to the mixer clean and at a reasonable level.? IT also finds the needed level to the mixer?
and that is under -10dbm for the available LO drive (that can increase maybe 2-3db).


The power amp I've been writing about since May has issues, many, and you have cataloged them.

Those being poor gain flatness, 3 vs 30 mhz.? it currently sags about 11db.

Poor IMD, many reasons including stages going into gain compression and that point varies with frequency due to poor devices.
Also the 3904 has a gain vs current that is a decreasing value with increasing current so the device becomes increasingly non linear.

The IRF510 is operating with a Drain to Drain load of 50 ohms. the calculated non saturating power out is 2.88w at 12V.
This is consistent with your 3W (at 13V?).? ?Either way the Drain load is way too high.? The transformer T11 is both
undersized for ferrite volume and the turns ratio is 1:1 and we need more like 1:2 or greater.? That means a drain load of
must be lower, at least half more like 1/4.?

And so it goes for the entire power chain.


Re: Searching for IMD

jim
 

Well ya there's that too ..But I drink coffee so...

Jim


On Sunday, September 16, 2018, 7:49:47 AM PDT, Raj vu2zap <rajendrakumargg@...> wrote:


I like the designs on the napkin with beer stains!

Raj

At 16/09/2018, you wrote:

Indeed ..Real near what I concluded on the old "back 'o the envelope trick"? ..

Jim


On Sunday, September 16, 2018, 1:42:26 AM PDT, Henning Weddig via Groups.Io <hweddig@...> wrote:


Allison,

at the beginning of my professional career 38 years ago I learned that to sketch level diagrammes will help a lot to understand the requirements of individual stages concerning gain, outputpower and even give some insight in IMD/ P1dB. A visiual display gives more information as jsut "bare numbers".

So I just sketeched such a block diagramme with the power levels in between, see the attachment.

From this point of view only the first stage can be critical in respect of gain-- although a MMIC - (or its equivalent using discrete components can do ?) can easily get this gain at "LF".?

Henning Weddig

DK5LV



Am 16.09.2018 um 02:13 schrieb ajparent1/KB1GMX:
Iz oos,

I was thinking whether a MMIC up to 10dbm and an RD06HHF as driver like in the 10w qrp-pa-2008 might make sense

Whats that going to fix?? The transformers need to be reworked, the prior stages in the amp are are poor.? And a MMIC
at 10dbm is near compression unless you get something ERA5 but then at 75 ma you only get 20db of gain.

Think this out.? To get from the mixer to the antenna you need 60db of power gain total!

Now if you used RD16hhf you get maybe 16db of gain more like 13 with feedback so the gain is flatter.
For 1/10th the cost the IRF510 can do that.? Either way 13DB.

So you need 47 db of gain call it 48 as a round number.

Your going to get that from three stages.
NOTE:
The last stage must supply more than 500mw from 3-30mhz.? [likely gain at that power under 13db]
The stage before that will have to supply maybe 70 (max) milliwatts. [likely best gain at that power maybe 15db]
The stage before that at most 3-4 milliwatts. [gains of 20db possible at low power]

Getting high gain at low power is easier.? Hard at higher power.? Its bad to run at max gain as then
the results are variable from unit to unit.

FYI most all fets will produce a lot of gain down at 3mhz, that's not the problem, its getting the same
{or close} gain from 3 to 30Mhz.

I've repeated this more than a few times in the past two days. All I hear is what about this fix.
Go look in the wiki, its spelled out.? Don't like it do the research and think system level.
And please do not bring up a monoband radio that may or may not perform well as its not
relevant or even meaningful.? Its a monoband it does not not have to work at any other
frequency and every time I look its clear it will not work in a 3-30 case.

Allison


Re: 2N2222A vs 2N3904 sourcing

jim
 

I was specifically referring to BIFILAR inductor ....Just like the big guys do it

Jim


On Sunday, September 16, 2018, 6:48:33 AM PDT, ajparent1/KB1GMX <kb1gmx@...> wrote:


Hi Jim,

Proof, it has ot make sense and consistant with my memory as i'm writer.? If you want to write a page you can.

As to the L8/L9? depends if its separate inductors as is or a bifilar inductor where the impedance can be much
lower as its balanced and DC only at the center plus its magnetically self canceling.

Allison


Re: Raduino fix leads to no receive uBitx #radiuno #ubitx

 

Thank you first and foremost? I apologize to the group. My signal has increased chu 7.85 nice strong my wire feeds off my cable attached to bnc connector got 200 feet 50 ohms type. I'm in apartment owner really did like amateur radio operators, any wire or antenna $300?next eviction in lease agreement. surrounded by apartment's . they are tolerant of patio furniture I read somewhere about a antenna umbrella. my patio size of a piece of sheetrock uncut I don't know the size 8 foot by 4 foot. any kind suggestions are welcome.?


On Sun, Sep 16, 2018, 10:57 AM James Lynes <jmlynesjr@...> wrote:
Resonant antenna is not required on receive. I've heard over 40 states and 20 countries with 65ft wire up 10ft in my rafters with my ZZRX-40 DC receiver.?

Check the BNC connector center pin. It's been noted that some have a loose fit.

Check for the Raduino clocks by using another receiver.?

James
KE4MIQ


Re: Raduino fix leads to no receive uBitx #radiuno #ubitx

James Lynes
 

Resonant antenna is not required on receive. I've heard over 40 states and 20 countries with 65ft wire up 10ft in my rafters with my ZZRX-40 DC receiver.?

Check the BNC connector center pin. It's been noted that some have a loose fit.

Check for the Raduino clocks by using another receiver.?

James
KE4MIQ


Re: Searching for IMD

 

I like the designs on the napkin with beer stains!

Raj

At 16/09/2018, you wrote:

Indeed ..Real near what I concluded on the old "back 'o the envelope trick"? ..

Jim


On Sunday, September 16, 2018, 1:42:26 AM PDT, Henning Weddig via Groups.Io <hweddig@...> wrote:


Allison,

at the beginning of my professional career 38 years ago I learned that to sketch level diagrammes will help a lot to understand the requirements of individual stages concerning gain, outputpower and even give some insight in IMD/ P1dB. A visiual display gives more information as jsut "bare numbers".

So I just sketeched such a block diagramme with the power levels in between, see the attachment.

From this point of view only the first stage can be critical in respect of gain-- although a MMIC - (or its equivalent using discrete components can do ?) can easily get this gain at "LF".?

Henning Weddig

DK5LV



Am 16.09.2018 um 02:13 schrieb ajparent1/KB1GMX:
Iz oos,

I was thinking whether a MMIC up to 10dbm and an RD06HHF as driver like in the 10w qrp-pa-2008 might make sense

Whats that going to fix?? The transformers need to be reworked, the prior stages in the amp are are poor.? And a MMIC
at 10dbm is near compression unless you get something ERA5 but then at 75 ma you only get 20db of gain.

Think this out.? To get from the mixer to the antenna you need 60db of power gain total!

Now if you used RD16hhf you get maybe 16db of gain more like 13 with feedback so the gain is flatter.
For 1/10th the cost the IRF510 can do that.? Either way 13DB.

So you need 47 db of gain call it 48 as a round number.

Your going to get that from three stages.
NOTE:
The last stage must supply more than 500mw from 3-30mhz.? [likely gain at that power under 13db]
The stage before that will have to supply maybe 70 (max) milliwatts. [likely best gain at that power maybe 15db]
The stage before that at most 3-4 milliwatts. [gains of 20db possible at low power]

Getting high gain at low power is easier.? Hard at higher power.? Its bad to run at max gain as then
the results are variable from unit to unit.

FYI most all fets will produce a lot of gain down at 3mhz, that's not the problem, its getting the same
{or close} gain from 3 to 30Mhz.

I've repeated this more than a few times in the past two days. All I hear is what about this fix.
Go look in the wiki, its spelled out.? Don't like it do the research and think system level.
And please do not bring up a monoband radio that may or may not perform well as its not
relevant or even meaningful.? Its a monoband it does not not have to work at any other
frequency and every time I look its clear it will not work in a 3-30 case.

Allison


Re: Searching for IMD

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

?Warren --- very helpful measurement!

Cheers,


gordon



From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Warren Allgyer <allgyer@...>
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 9:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [BITX20] Searching for IMD
?
This is going to be way over the top for "nerd-ishism". Probably not the cup of tea for many........

The question I wanted to answer for myself was: "So.... if we can linearize the SSB generator signal chain so that it produces no appreciable intermodulation products, what would be the capabilities of the transmitter from the final mixer through the PA?" To answer that question I needed a 45 MHz, two-tone signal with no IMD. If I have that and I inject it into the new filter followed by the mixer, then any IMD measured on the output is the result of that chain and not of the SSB generator and the bi-directional amps. In essence, "what is the clean power capability of the PA section of the radio?"

The answer is "About 3 watts."

So I made a 45 MHz two-tone test signal by setting one output of my signal generator to 44.996000 MHz and a second to 44.997000.? Both signals are more or less centered on the 45 MHz filter passband and are the same level, 1 KHz apart. Those two signals are put into a hybrid combiner and then through an attenuator to the injection point in the graphic, the input to the new filter. By varying the attenuator (with RV1 set for maximum) I could control the SSB output of the radio.?

IMD was measured at the 1 watt out level for reference and then the level increased until IMD measured -24 dB. The power level was different on each band but was a little over 3 watts for the lower three bands. For 10 meters (not shown) I was only able to get 2.1 watts at that IMD threshold.

For each band the purple trace shows intermodulation (refer to the table) when the injection level is set to produce one watt. The blue trace shows the power level in dBm that resulted from increasing the injection level until the IMD reached -24 dB.

So what does all of that mean? It means if we can completely clean up the SSB generator, and that looks reasonably possible, we have a 3 Watt SSB transceiver until someone tackles linearizing the transmit power chain. Lots of work to do!

WA8TOD


Re: Searching for IMD

Warren Allgyer
 

On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 07:10 AM, ajparent1/KB1GMX wrote:

Allison
"It would be adequate...? the only problem I see is the mixer has an injection of about 5dbm so any level more than
about -2db has it fully saturated.? I'm saying in compression, I mean saturated."
Yup. That is kind of the point of the last post. This is not a 10 watt SSB radio. It is not a 5 watt SSB radio. It is a 1.5 - 2 watt SSB radio unless someone re-designs (and tests!) the RF chain.

WA8TOD