Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- BITX20
- Messages
Search
ubitx s-meter swr-meter help
#bitx20
#bitx40
#bitx40help
#arduino
#calibration
Hello i am using the 1.80 firmware from KD8CEC?on my ubitx with a 2X16 lcd display? and i have noticed the s-meter bargraph? is working only in Rx mode, but when i switch to TX gets stuck with the last value . I want to use the bargraph while transmit to measure the power or the swr. i think? the display update is disabled while tx in the source code. any help wil be appreciated, thanks in advance 73! YO4HUJ Adrian.
|
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
Regarding a CW filter , a simple audio filter with 2 or 3 Amps from a Quad-opamp might be a simple start for good CW listening. There are many circuits on the Web.
Frank??? ,??? EI7KS |
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
My reply is for limited use at audio level. Sorry. May not be relavent.? On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, 9:11 pm Mvs Sarma, <mvssarma@...> wrote:
|
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
Why not use max7400 as a n lpf. It is a nice 8 pin dip and/or sm? Spend a while to study the datasheet. It can become variable lpf. On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, 4:38 pm _Dave_ K0MBT, <davesters@...> wrote: Yes I was hoping to steal someones design and spend less than 10 dollars. |
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
For those who don't get the joke... On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 8:48 AM Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...> wrote:
Dale Hardin 24750 State St. Unit 487 Elberta, AL 36530 251-597-9256 --
Dale Hardin, KS4NS Elberta, AL |
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
Vince Vielhaber
I did the same thing in the late 70s with a fone company toroid and a cap. Made for one sharp CW filter. I just recently removed it from my 75A-4 receiver, didn't work that well anymore, the cap was all dried out and I don't do enough CW to need it.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Vince - K8ZW. On 08/16/2019 07:13 AM, Gordon Gibby wrote:
You can put in an op amp analog filter for very small outlay of cash. --
K8ZW |
Mark - N7EKU
Thanks Peter!
Beside all the TX circuitry, the relay is also driving two other relay coils, so I wonder if that may cause a bit of stress too?? Initial resistance of the relay coils in parallel might be pretty low. I don't know the draw of the TX (not counting the finals on a separate circuit) but I don't think it woul be close to 2A?? So looking at sequencing, or just a beefier relay may be the long term answer. 73, Mark PS:? I suspect the 28W may be due to Don running the finals at more than 12V? |
Re: V5.1 and Nextion 5¡±
Joe Puma
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Aug 16, 2019, at 5:22 AM, Murray Wills (ZL2IQ) <murray@...> wrote:
|
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
Gordon Gibby
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
|
Carrier suppression on uBITX v5 - -35 to -40 dB ok?
For USB/LSB on the uBITX, what is a reasonable carrier suppression?? (and how is that properly measured, i.e. I assume it's carrier relative to peak?)
Background:? I should have left well enough alone, but... I've been using my uBITX for FT8 and PSK31, and had directly connected my uBITX mic input to my USB soundcard's headphone output, and my uBITX speaker output to my USB soundcard's mic input.? No special adapter circuits or anything.? Worked fine, bunch of good QSOs.? Fast forward, I was reading about interface circuits, and saw someone said that I MUST put a blocking capacitor between the respective inputs/outputs.? Well, I didn't do that.? Also read about someone saying that a few volts into the mic input could kill diodes in the balanced modulator, leading to carrier leak through.? So then I got paranoid and figured I should check my signal to make sure I hadn't done something like that.? Which brings us to now... Test Setup:? uBITX v5 transmitting into a dummy load.? RTL-SDR dongle plugged into my PC, operating in direct mode.? "Tone generator": me whistling into the mic.? GQRX running on my PC to view the spectrum.? Just eyeballing the spectrum display. Results: (1) with background noise only ... noise floor ~ -75 to -80 dB on GQRX readout.? With PTT on, no tone, desired sideband ~ -75 to -70 db, carrier ~ -75 to -70 db (visibly distinct from desired sideband), opposite sideband absent. (2) with a tone ... noise floor ~ -75 to -80 dB on GQRX readout.? With PTT on, "whistle" tone, desired sideband ~ -35 dB (peak), carrier seems to be unchanged (-70 to -75 or so), opposite sideband still absent (carrier kind of gets lost in the spectrum from my "whistle" at this point, but as I increase the volume from nothing, the carrier appears to be staying the same). Does this all seem reasonable??? Thanks! -Rob (PS - As an aside, I checked the DC bias on the USB sound card mic in and headphone out... mic in ~ 2V, which I assume it to drive electrets, and headphone out is 0V) |
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 04:13 AM, Gordon Gibby wrote:
Used toroids probably surplus from the phone companyYes, those were popular back in the day for home-brew projects. Many folks built RTTY demodulators with them. Tom, wb6b |
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
Gordon Gibby
You can put in an op amp analog filter for very small outlay of cash.
I can remember building my first audio filter in the dark ages around 1973. Used toroids probably surplus from the phone company to build filters, and vacuum tubes to amplify the audio signals. Worked pretty good!!! Far far easier today. Gordon ________________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of _Dave_ K0MBT <davesters@...> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 7:08 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BITX20] Narrow filter for CW #ubitxcw Yes I was hoping to steal someones design and spend less than 10 dollars. Have to agree that adding a 300 dollar filter to a radio that I bought used for 45 dollars is not going to happen. |
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
Yes I was hoping to steal someones design and spend less than 10 dollars.
Have to agree that adding a 300 dollar filter to a radio that I bought used for 45 dollars is not going to happen. |
A stuck relay that releases on being tapped usually indicates that (some of) the contacts themselves are sticking together, presumably from arcing. Of cause there could be a dry joint somewhere so reflowing all joints to the relay and its driver is an important first step. And see if the sticking still occurs at lower levels of, say, 10W. |
Re: V5.1 and Nextion 5¡±
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHi everyone
Installed a separate PS and updated the display software. Very pleased with the results.
I also have a higher output regulator coming so the step down PS is only temporary. That board will be useful for other projects.
Thanks for all the help
73. Murray ZL2IQ
|