¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date

Re: No S-Meter nor callsign showing in KD8CEC #ubitx

 

You need to run Ubitx Manager on your PC.

Philip G7JUR


No S-Meter nor callsign showing in KD8CEC #ubitx

 

Hello everybody,

I just installed ND6Ts AGC Circuit and wanted to turn on the S-Meter in the firmware according to the instructions on
KD8CECs Homepage.
However I just can't get it on the display.

Whatever I selection of options I choose,? the only things i get on my standard 16x02 Parallel Display is

VFO A, VFO B, Mode, and tuning steps. I can change which VFO is shown first (toggling) or switch on (and off) rotation,
but I am not able to get my callsign or the S-Meter on the display.

The S-Meter signal is there - i checked it in the setup, ADC Pin7 gets read and a reasonable value is shown.

Am i doing something wrong? I thought first I may have accidently uploaded the 16x04 P Firmeware and reuploaded again -
this was not the case.

However according to the pictures (http://www.hamskey.com/2018/05/setting-smeter-to-ubitx-with-cec.html) there must be a way.

Any help would be appreciated.

Sascha, DL5SMB


uBitx V4 linearity mod in final audio amplifier #ubitx

 

I believe there is an nonlinearity problem on some of the newer V4 uBitx radios (the one with transistors in the final audio amp). Two of my radios had this problem.
The problem is that the two diodes in the final amp doesn't make a voltage drop that is larger than the drop over the BJT B-C junction drops, so there will be a crossover distortion problem.

I did a mod: cut the trace between the diodes. Soldere in a 500 ohm pot paralelled with the a 125 ohm resistor. I adjusted the pot from a low value and increased the resistance until the nonlinearity disappeared by listening to a moderately strong cw signal. I checked the lower transistor so it didnt become too warn from the quiescent current.

73s


RF AGC experiments #ubitx

 

The uBitx is prone to overload if there are strong signals. I have done some tests with an analog AGC detector and different FET shunts on the RX line after the relay before the first mixer.

I used a similar detector circuit as other people have published here. However, I used a BC548 as an audio amplifier instead as this is a very common bipolar transistor that is highly available with a high Hfe. The Hfe is approx 200x on the B series . The gain was set to approx? 200 in a common emitter amplifier. I take the signal from before the volume control. (Be aware that the volume control pot affects the impedance a bit so the level changes even if you tap on the hot side of the audio pot ... ). The detector is two 1N4148 diodes. There is a 1uF capacitor and a 1Meg resistor to set the first order RC circuit constant.

I tried with different FETs I had laying on the shack. Since this fet is used as a is a RF shunt circuit, it is not possible to use a JFET directly since JFETs are depletion mode.

By using an enhancement mode N channel Mosfet the RF shunt presents a high impedance to the AGC amplifier / recitifier. However, the output capacitance of the RF shunt Mosfet is a bit critial. I tried with a FQP30N06L (output capacitance in the 300pF range) and a IRLIZ44N (output capacitance in the 400pF range). Those presents a too low Z to the RF path since XC = 1/(2*pi*f*C). This is around 28ohm at 14 MHz, which will cause attenuation when the AGC is not active.
Instead I used a BSS138L N mosfet that I took of a level converter board I had laying around (I cut the board in four with the SMD part on to ease soldering). I soldered the mosfet controlled RF shunt directly to the relay pin and to ground on the back side of the uBitx circuit board instead of going in on the top side of the board as some other have reported on this forum. See pic.

Shunt mosfet for RF AGC:


The AGC seems to work well even with just one shunt element.




Testing with and without AGC:





FQP30N06L
FQP30N06L


Re: Help with AGC kit wiring

 

Bill, The trace cut is shown under the manual . You are correct with the destinations but that trace between them needs to be separated anyway and this is a convenient way to do it. The AGC board is designed so that if you use a 3-pin right-angle header instead of the 2-pin shown, you can plug the board right in. Instead of bending the middle pin to meet the traces like the others do, drill a hole through to the ground plane on the underside just large enough to accept the diameter of the pin and bend the pin over to go through it. Scrape the coating off of the area around the pin there and solder it for an excellent ground return. Between the glue holding the new header to the board, the mechanical support of the new hole, and the three solder connections it becomes nice and sturdy. If you placed that connector carefully, the new board will plug right in with enough clearance to the other parts. Bring over your twisted pair from the volume control (or the plug), and your +5 volts (like the green wire from Raduino pin 3 and decide how you would like to select your AGC release timing.
Otherwise, bring those two coaxial cable center conductors to their respective "In" and "out" holes, their shields to the center hole between, and jumper between points #1 and #2 as shown.

My best advice is to take your time. Plan a lot, Work slowly. You want to make the experience last, right? Like taking a vacation. A person doesn't want it to be over quickly!
73, Don


Homebrew from scratch #ubitx

Woolf Brebner
 

I'd like to build a uBitx completely from scratch. I've been looking at the circuit diagram and I cant figure out how to wire up the raduino. How would one make a raduino from scratch and wire it to a uBitx? I'd preferably like to be able to build it on a proto board. Would it be doable for someone with pretty good experience in wiring pcbs and proto-boards to build a uBitx from scratch on a proto board. If not does anyone have pcb designs for the uBitx and the raduino. And does anyone have a list of everything I would need to purchase to build a uBitx. I don't want to ask to much but if anyone has built a uBitx from scratch and has files and such that would be great. Thanks a lot, in advance.


Re: Ubitx and Sherwood rx tests

 

Between the microR2 and the miniR2, yes, they listen easy.
The most noticeable property is listening to a pile up, rather than a mis of heterodynes
and noise you hear what sounds like a busy restaurant with everyone talking.? Its then
up to the ear to pick it apart.

The closest I have to the Drake is the Atlas 210X, it was a single conversion HF IF?
solid state radio when that was becoming common.? Its twist is no RF amp.? If we
get past the VFO drift some suffered it was a very clean radio to listen to on a busy
band.? I was lucky to find two of them in functional condition missing things like Mic
and power connector and needing some minor fixes.? One is fully restored and
includes a few engineering fixes from back when and its a very nice, compact for
a 100W radio, and yet a very simple radio.

I've worked on Drake R4Cs and TR4s and they are very good but there are a set
of mods for them that make it an amazing radio.? The one feature was the PTO being
good and stable.? ? Yes, people mod radios even then!? Adding new technology
and knowledge to make a good radio better.

How a radio sounds and feel is why some radios I have get used more.? IT's that?
intangible better.

Allison


Remote cooling fan indicator #ubitx

 

I installed my 12v auxiliary cooling fan in my uBITX earlier today to replace the unseemly box fan I had propped up over my open cased radio.? After I installed it and dialed in the temps I fired up WSJT-X to see if there was any performance changes with the fan on, well, lo and behold I discovered that I have a "remote digital fan on indicator" on all bands so I'm assuming it's getting in via the audio circuit not RF side.? It also turns off when the fan does.? Perfect, I think I'll leave it.

Behold:


Re: Raduino needed.

 

Farhan has posted Gerbers for Raduino. I guess one can order few boards from China for their personal use. I have also uploaded a homebrew friendly single sided board for making PCB by toner transfer.

Rahul VU3WJM


Help with AGC kit wiring

Bill Carpenter
 

My surprising success with the click kit has emboldened me to go ahead and try building Kees ND6T AGC kit. ?I want to build a simple version without any extra controls and I am confused as to the wiring of the in and out wires. ?ND6T has a nice drawing of how to do this with a control but not how to do so without a control. ?I think out goes to K1 pin 12 via RG-174 coax and in goes to K3 pin 14 via RG-174. ?Is that correct? ?Also I swear I saw somewhere that a trace needs to be cut but now I can't find that.

Any helps greatly appreciated as I continue to learn how to deal with itsy bitsy SMD stuff.

73, Bill NZ0T


Re: My New CNC engraved front arrived

 

Very nice!??
I ordered my fathers day present yesterday ().
What are you using to generate the artwork & gerber files?? I do not have a large surplus of funds...? Looking for programs for Windows 10 environment...
Much obliged?
de N5LXK
73


Re: #bitx40 #bitx40

 

Here you go :?


On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 12:40 AM, <victor.rodrigo.jimenez@...> wrote:
Hello. How are you?
Mr. I need the program of the mini arduino of my bitx40. since the one that I had was burned and I had to change it. your help is appreciated



Re: Ubitx and Sherwood rx tests

 

the contemporary method of rating the goodness of a receiver is now down to a single test : reciprocal mixing dynamic range. simply stated, you have? very low distortion crystal oscillator amplified to +10 dbm and fed through a very stiff low pass filter. Then you use this as the input to a receiver and tune away by 20 KHz and measure the increase in noise, with the +10dbm signal switch on and off.? this will measure the phase noise as well as blocking dynamic range, as well as (indirectly, though) the IIP3.?
The other parameter is the in-channel dynamic range. That is, what is the range of signals that the radio can handle simultaneously within the audio pass-band. currently, 90 db is the winner.
Finally, there is the most important though completely unquantifiable quality of how operator fatigue. How much tired will you be after listening to the radio for 10 hours continuously??
A great vintage radio that satisfies these is the Drake TR4. Sherwood is all praise for them. Even to this day, an analog VFO based radio with? decent audio chain will run circles around the Flex6700. Try a microR2 if you can get hold of one.
- f

On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 2:31 AM, ajparent1/KB1GMX <kb1gmx@...> wrote:
Sherwood only tests receivers so the only must have mod is the RX AGC ND6T flavor.

All the hot receivers are SDR and direct digital sample (flex, and Anan) thought the
7300 (also a SDR) is up there.

Of the radios using more conventional analog techniques two of mine the Atlas?
and the TT 340 are fair comparisons for single conversion.? The Tentec is the
only low IF with selectable filters at 9mhz to digital IF unlike those with VHF
first IFs.??Of those three the? listed radios Tentec Eagle, Atlas 215X,
Tentec 340/Triton? on the list in that order from best to worst.? This radio
without AGC is not likely to be above any of them.? Also the Atlas 215X a
1976ish design is a diode mixer front end like the uBitx with?and AGC in
the IF and a diode mixer for product detector so it would compare
closest to the uBitx.??

Note: In dollars none of those radios even as used/broken approach 100$
and new were much more expensive by many times.

Comparable transceivers in the power class is FT817, IC703 and
Tentec Argonaut QRP series such as the used Argonaut model 505
that I use very regular for the 5W QRP level.

Reasons that is likely:
RX overload point, the limit here being the diode mixer.?
Filters First (45mhz) is wide and the second is fixed at SSB bandwidth.
close in and wide overload
Phase noise from the LO systems (LO1, LO2, BFO).

Sensitivity is never an issue.??

Allison



#bitx40 #bitx40

 

Hello. How are you?
Mr. I need the program of the mini arduino of my bitx40. since the one that I had was burned and I had to change it. your help is appreciated


Re: #bitx40 #bitx40

 

RoughTranslation:

Hello,
I need the raduino program for bitx40, I had to change it for a new one.


On Sun, Jun 17, 2018, 2:04 PM <victor.rodrigo.jimenez@...> wrote:
hola,?
estimados necesito el programa del raduaido para el bitx40, lo tuve que cambiar por uno nuevo?


Re: The BITeensio board is here. #ubitx

 

just use your phone's camera. I even saw an app that will decode the resistors' colour codes
- f

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 12:30 AM, Gwen Patton <ardrhi@...> wrote:
Jack, I ordered one because of the post here. I have a crappy little USB microscope, but it's a bitch to use for electronics. This was affordable, so I ordered it. It should be here in a couple of days, and I'll let you know how it serves.

Gwen NG3P



Re: The BITeensio board is here. #ubitx

 

Whoops, sorry, Jim. I had already replied to Jack before I saw your post. I'll take further comments to a separate post.


Re: The BITeensio board is here. #ubitx

 

Jack, I ordered one because of the post here. I have a crappy little USB microscope, but it's a bitch to use for electronics. This was affordable, so I ordered it. It should be here in a couple of days, and I'll let you know how it serves.

Gwen NG3P


Re: Raduino needed.

Gordon Gibby
 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Dennis, they are in short supply. Somebody might be willing to let one go for you, however I have created a circuit board design that isn¡¯t the same size but could be used. I could send you the Gerber files and then you simply order the boards from China, wait one week to receive them,?and build one. ??Additionally there are some folks here who have come up with more elaborate designs that would do many many things¡ª those are orderable already made. ?

?




On Jun 17, 2018, at 14:42, Dennis Yancey <bigbluedry@...> wrote:

Looking for a factory Raduino. Hoping someone has one they aren¡¯t using. If not, can someone tell me how to get one from the factory? ?LCD is not necessary.?

Thanks
72 and God bless.


Re: An Apology and clarification #ubitx

Brian L. Davis
 

So sorry that your postal system is so destructive, maybe you should contact them instead of this group!
Being a retired Electronic service engineer and college lecturer I suggest that instead of maligning the creators of these radios that do work, you design a radio that will do what these radios do and sell it for $120.? If you can't or won't then please stop whining, it's unbecoming of anyone with an Amateur Radio license, with or without your background!