开云体育

AC9TU ..EVAN Hi Evan , Thank You so Much for your last reply . I got stuck into this XLoader debacle today . I downloaded an older version of it ( V 1.0 ) and put that onto an older Laptop I have here

Around line 177 in the ubitx_v6.1_code.ino, the address of the CW_KEY_TYPE parameter in EEPROM is set at 358. The previous parameters (VFO_A_MODE and VFO_B_MODE) are? at 256 and 257 respectively.

Rubens, Simplesmente n?o tenho tempo para brincar com tudo como pensei que faria. Também estou reduzindo um pouco o barraco e adoro construir coisas. 73 -- David N8DAH

Link to group is: /g/ucx Dave, AA6RE wrote:

AAT (Automatic Attenuator Control)? _._

All: I just finished another pass through my Beginning C for Microcontrollers book. The narrative of the book is virtually the same as previous printings, but this one increases the font size from

Simon Full circle. This all started with people modifying a QCX. It's great to see Hans supporting the hardware mod. Although, as he carefully notes, you will need firmware and support from the group.

Hi Curt and hi Gary ... to be honest I'm not even a little angry, on the contrary I'm stimulated to try to learn something more (as Bill rightly says, the more I study the more I realize that I still

Ok agree its not an agc. But it addresses the problem of having your eardrums blown out with a sudden strong signal when you are wearing headphones. Plus it is easy to bypass. Just place a tiny reed

Loris Interesting viewpoint, as I agree it is unusual to place AGC attenuation at the very front. I had not seen any loss measurements, and I imagine they vary with frequency. Perhaps they are not as

Hi Loris, There are a lot of newbies here and they just don't know. Don't be angry. Just help them alomng if they are actually open to help. I started learning about physics and electronics in the

Mestre David - N8DAH Meus parabens, é um sonho!!! Por que você quer vender tudo isto? -- 73's PY2PVB Rubens Kamimura GG49in07 Em ter., 17 de nov. de 2020 às 02:27, N8DAH <Dherron@...>

Hi Bill ... I fully agree with you! What I am wondering is "why" this forum continues to call AGC a very vulgar "ATTENUATOR" even if more or less automatic. 73 Loris

Hi, Attenuating the signal at the receive antenna input is not gain control at all. Attenuation can reduce overwhelming signals that distort the receiver front end and make those very weak signals

It is not an AGC it is an antenna attenuator and good if you go to you will lose from 2 to 3 points S in reception, the system is not bypassable, even when turned off the MOSFET remains inserted in

The new QCX mini in the pipeline from QRPLabs is proposed to come with some simple circuit modifications built in to make it easy to turn the QCX mini into a ucx (there are some user supplied parts

The uSDX is a development effort that has several evolving designs, it's not a single product like the uBITX V6. One cool aspect of it is that it uses a highly efficient class E amp not only for CW,

From my tests and from the measurements made, it appears to me that the best known "AGC" modification module is a very bad "ATTENUATOR" placed in series with the receiving antenna! Although I have

Arv, the speaker detached and bounced around. ?Finals were bent and the AGC board was ripped out of the three pin connector. ?Hot on the trail, I bent the transistors back straight, did some

Frank, KG9H What are the symptoms (what works and what does not work)? A picture of the damaged board might be interesting. Pinout for the off-board connections are in the assembly manual. Pinout for