开云体育

Show your data and methodology.

I have and disproved your methods, logic and resulting data. Allison

I just installed an LM380 amplifier instead. Why an old '380? Because they are rated for 22 volts and I had a bunch. Found one with less than 5ma. quiescent current. Very quiet and just the right

Allison i am not going to engage further in these semantic battles. I have produced data, discussion, and transparent methodologies. You have produced words. Your agenda does not seem to be in pursuit

Well done Kees and thanks. I agree the moment has come to call "Time". Having the gerbers available will enable others to have boards produced if required, including future group buys. 73 Bill, VK7MX

Make sure all the wires actaully connect at both ends.? specifically the black brown and yellow. There are a few other things it could be but one step at a time.? The fact ther eis some change

The rf path you normalised is the inner conductor and the inner shield.? Doesn't stop or measure current flowing on the outer side of the shield.? ?Explain to me how the RF on the outside of the

Your did not understand or you'd stop and fix your error.? Using? 2 meters of wire and calling that common at RF is about as faulty as one can get.?? Repeating myself.? The RF circuit for the

Warren doing it wrong and calling it good..... "Oh stop.... please!"? To borrow your own line. It is not the case for testing the transformer.? ? Your trying to make a case that is invalid. Allison

Oh stop.... please! I tested the transformers in an environment in which they would be used. The cables were normalized out of the equation by connecting them to each other before normalizing the

Allison I understand your point. 1) I was testing a known configuration of the transformer which joins the primary and secondary together on the low side. I could test the transformers with the low

I am using a LM386 with the V4 ubitx, works really well. Philip G7JUR

That actually Gary N3GO that cooked that one.? I thought it a good idea too. http://ubitx.net/? ? All the good ideas in one place. Allison

That and it makes the hunt the missing or extra { or } a lot easier as it likes to span files. Annoying to say the least. Allison

As a general rule, the directory holding the sketch must match the INO file name that holds the setup() and loop() functions. Personally, I don't have sketches with multiple INO files; I only have

Yes, Allison's solution would certainly work. The single diode in series with R52 does cure the spurious TX output at the beginning of transmission. For discharging the TX line, just one of the

if any of you folks need a new pc, here is a very good deal..

If C52 and C64 are isolated by diodes then the RX and TX voltages will have no large capacitors to filter low frequency noises. ?It might not be a problem here but I've had a number of "unexplained"

Its not obvious so I'll try to explain. Lets say we have two transformers (any for the moment save for they are the same). Also the transformer have a separated primary and secondary as that makes it

I found that by simply increasing C1 to 2.2 uF (just parallel the existing 0.1 uF cap) the keying shape is greatly improved with about 3 ms attack and 6 ms decay. That is much better than the key