开云体育

I'll draw something up, take a picture and post it as soon as I get a chance. I have some other changes, simple ones, that also are worth the effort and I should post them also.

Just uploaded the latest list of those interested in an AGC and Click Mini-kit as described earlier (in the "Files" section under my call). Since there does not seem to be a demand for the boards

Yes. Spend? a little time at the ubitx.net site. Jack, W8TEE

I think it could be done without too much confusion by using preprocessor directives. That way, you don't actually mess with the code; you only change the symbolic constants you wish to affect. For

I have already built your BITX40 which I am using with great satisfaction. I have just received your "Micro BITX40". I ask you if I can feed the two IRF510s separately with a higher voltage to get a

Hi Allison The?KSP10BU looks like a twin of the MPSH10.? It is available from DigiKey for $0.19, quantity of 1.

This is where problems will begin to occur. Are you going to add in functionality to modify ubitx_menu.ino on the fly? Or are you going to break up ubitx_menu.ino into a lot of little pieces that can

We need a bit more information in order to help troubleshoot your uBITX. 1) Which opto-coupler on the schematic drawing are you referring to as being inoperative? Is it the manufacturer provided

Me-O-My-O I/O board. Jack, W8TEE

Anyone?

Try again next week?

Regarding this contest, I forgot to mention -- you may enter as many times as you like (different name for each entry though).? In case the winning entry is duplicated by another person, the earliest

I think it's a great idea to see what we can squeeze out of the existing Raduino with it's Nano by using the KD8CEC code. No changes other than a HEX download for existing uBITX machines (if you keep

As I've posted elsewhere, I built a K2 a few years back.? It has a variable bandwidth IF filter that looks kind of similar to the ladder filter in the uBitx.? Each node has a 100k pull-up resistor

This is a good idea and might make it easier to peel off those features not desired. The source already lends itself to this approach. I have not studied it closely enough to know whether specific

Allison is right, the SD library is bloated. Perhaps someone can put it on a diet like Jerry did for the Si5351 library. Another point to be made is that, in my experience, it's not the flash memory

In fact, to expand on this… I think Ian should consider block defines for sections of the code that people want or don’t want. He has already done this in selecting the type of display (2 line or

Having done a SD interface with Arduino I can say the SD library is huge.? The reason is the typical SD is used with the FAT filesystem and it takes a bit of code to navigate that. If one treats the

A quick suggestion: the idea "up the top of EEPROM" should be defined as a specific offset from the EEPROM base. My reasoning is because I expect different ?C's to come into play over time. This

That was amazing, Allard! I will be passing that on to some friends. Thanks for sharing that with us!? N5KNG