¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Re: Flutter Fix
I will be sure to check out the analyzer when it comes out. By the time you guys get this bit of code organized where I can just copy and paste it in, I should be done putting mine in an enclosure. A
By John Smith · #22395 ·
Re: CW or not to CW?
Well, conventionally PSK31 uses upper-sideband. If you've got an SI5351-based BitX, it's a fairly simple matter to change sidebands. I've forgotten what sideband is typically used for RTTY. This
By Todd K7TFC · #22394 ·
Re: CW or not to CW?
Well, that's what I was afraid of. It is like trying to make milk from chalk and water, you're going to need a lot more than what you got. In other words, it's impractical.? I would need proper
By John Smith · #22393 ·
Re: CW or not to CW?
If you inject a 700Hz carrier into the mixer, you will produce two mixes + and - of the carrier. The xtal filter removes one and what is left is a pure carrier. not MCW as I know it. If the carrier
By Raj vu2zap · #22392 ·
Re: BitX40 R3 schematic
Jerry, That was me on R104. No idea on 100 ohms emitter of Q13. I propose to parallel on Q13. I tried to blow the transistor Q13 with my main rig on 40M but BITX on a wire.. did not blow. The double
By Raj vu2zap · #22391 ·
Re: Flutter Fix
John: I have an article coming out in QST on an Arduino antenna analyzer. The bad news is that I don't know when it will be printed; only that it will be "by Feb next year". That said, it's built on
By Jack Purdum <econjack@...> · #22390 ·
Re: Enclosure for BITX40
I would suggest Roy and others to try out shielding tape . This is from aliexpress and appears very cheap and just sticks.
By MVS Sarma · #22389 ·
Re: no matching function for call??
Kent, I posted this a couple weeks ago. There is another version of the code around that has this error fixed,. Randy, K7AGE I am using IDE version 1.6.12. BITX40 code from -
By Randy Hall · #22388 ·
Re: no matching function for call??
What changes are required to the sketch to use the current version? I was unable to locate version 1.0.2 v/r Fred W4JLE Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 11:34 To: [email protected] Subject: Re:
By Dr Fred Hambrecht · #22387 ·
Re: Flutter Fix
To reinforce what Jerry is saying, pin names 0 and 1 on the Nano are used to communicate with the PC via the Serial object, so it's best to leave them as is if you expect to do any debugging. Pin 2
By Jack Purdum <econjack@...> · #22386 ·
Re: Flutter Fix
Whoops, had a copy-and-paste error. ?That first line should be: ? ?pinMode(4, OUTPUT); Also, while that first line is typically in the ?setup() ?routine, the other three lines could be most
By Jerry Gaffke · #22385 ·
Re: Enclosure for BITX40
Looks great Roy, what speaker/size are you using? David KG7WFM wrote:
By bigdswitzer · #22384 ·
Re: KB1GMX on the BITX
Allison's comments are probably worth chasing a little further. ?Here's a summary of her points, and my comments: 1) ?Diode ring injection level should be higher for the 1n4148's Likely true. ?An
By Jerry Gaffke · #22383 ·
Re: Flutter Fix
John Smith, Regarding noTone() Pin 6 is used in the Raduino sketch for "CW_TONE", Ashhar has it set up to send out a sidetone. ?Probably best to let pin 6 be, pin 4 is free though, it gets defined as
By Jerry Gaffke · #22382 ·
Re: CW or not to CW?
Modulated CW (MCW) originally was a AM tone. So you had carrier plus both side-bands. Receivable on ordinary am receiver.
By William Kimber <zl1tao@...> · #22381 ·
Re: CW or not to CW?
A pure sine wave into the mic of an ideal SSB transceiver would transmit a clean AIA CW signal. ?In the real world, that sine wave will be distorted, and the carrier not fully suppressed. ?But it
By Jerry Gaffke · #22380 ·
Enclosure for BITX40
http://m.banggood.com/Electronic-Plastic-Shell-Cartridge-Handle-Project-Case-Desk-Instrument-200x175x70mm-p-1035473.html?rmmds=search I had ordered a couple of the Banggood cases and finally got to
By Roy Appleton · #22379 ·
Re: CW or not to CW?
Aside from attempts to use the BitX for what I would call "true CW," i.e., "A1A" mode in which the carrier is directly keyed (with or without shaping) and having a "necessary" bandwidth of only a few
By Todd K7TFC · #22378 ·
Re: Flutter Fix
That's shipped out of California. If you have more weeks than you do dollars, there's cheaper.
By Jerry Gaffke · #22377 ·
Re: Flutter Fix
Good grief...$4.50! Unbelievable how cheap things like this are. The Teensy 3.6 is another one: 1Mb of flash, 256K SRAM, and a 180MHz clock for under $30...amazing! Jack, W8TEE To: [email protected]
By Jack Purdum <econjack@...> · #22376 ·