¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
Ok Lou, I¡¯ll get you in touch with the right folks. I¡¯m currently at a conference in Denver so this my take a couple of days¡­ Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ
By K9HZ · #2580 ·
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
Hey Bill, the developer version of sBitx was my driver to build your amp, I have not integrated it yet but would love to find the others that did it already. If you know of a thread where that was
By Lou, KI5FTY · #2579 ·
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
That would be great! When you¡¯re talking mounting something new, photographs are always a great idea!
By Gordon Gibby KX4Z · #2578 ·
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
Just wanted to clarify in case there was any misunderstanding. Thanks, Al
By Albert Peter · #2577 ·
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
Ok no problem. There are others in the sBITx group that have already done it. I¡¯ll send them your way. Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ VP2EHZ Owner -
By K9HZ · #2576 ·
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
In MY forum, I¡¯m not so worried about that. I¡¯d rather see what you are replying to. BUT PLEASE FOLLOW JACKS RULES IN HIS FORUM!!! Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ
By K9HZ · #2575 ·
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
It¡¯s up to you. I have 2 degrees in electrical engineering and adding this amplifier to a tightly constructed SBitx version two would not be something I would be interested in trying on my own at
By Gordon Gibby KX4Z · #2574 ·
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
Test. How to avoid the previous posts? Don¡¯t hit the show quoted text? Larry KB3CUF
By Larry Acklin · #2573 ·
K9HZ PA
The information you seek/suggest (4 points of connection and the recommended heat sink) are already in the build instructions¡­ along with a schematic (to identify the 4 points of connection: RF IN,
By K9HZ · #2572 ·
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
So what you¡¯ll need to do is come up with mounting and connection information for people so that it becomes a real add-on kit. Just a board by it self is not sufficient.
By Gordon Gibby KX4Z · #2571 ·
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
Well Gordon, we meet again¡­ Yes after suffering through the uBITx project with a bunch of people who really wanted to correct many of the design deficiencies (like the pre and PA section for
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
It¡¯s easy to see things to criticize. The trick here would be to create a upgrade kit that would make with the design and allow a better amplifier to be daughter boarded. That would give a great
By Gordon Gibby KX4Z · #2569 ·
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
This was not directed at the T41. Rather the likes of the Bitx family. Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ Owner - Operator Big Signal Ranch ¨C K9ZC Staunton,
By K9HZ · #2568 ·
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
The T41 design was a compromise on several fronts ¨C primarily price vs performance., hence the situation with the power out. T41 is designed to be a teaching tool with flexibility and modularity. At
By Albert Peter · #2567 ·
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
Thanks Dave. Yep, that little thing is a real gem. I designed and built it because I just can¡¯t stand hobby-ish radios that put out 40 watts on 7 MHz, and then 3 watts on 28 MHz. It just means the
By K9HZ · #2566 ·
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
Bill, this week I assembled two of the 20Wt amplifiers and they work great. I was sweeping them at about 5watts with my NanoVNA and a 49dB attenuator (calibrated nano with the attenuator chain). I
By D Solt · #2565 ·
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
I also have a conference this week in Denver so things will pause for a few days on my end. I did send schematics to Al to review yesterday though so trying to multitask and get stuff out ASAP. I did
By K9HZ · #2564 ·
Re: [SoftwareControlledHamRadio] V010 vs V011
-------- Original message --------From: "John Melton via groups.io" <john.d.melton@...> Date: 2023-10-07 10:01 a.m. (GMT-05:00) To: [email protected] Subject:
By Wayde VA3NCA/AD2GX · #2563 ·
Re: Learning while on vacation
FWIW Flex actually split the processing between their fpga and TI DSP chips (TMS320). See this video for some more info: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eE_c-dSEu4E
By Dave VE3LHO · #2562 ·
Re: 20w rf amp - need help
See below: Jack, W8TEE
By Jack, W8TEE · #2561 ·